Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M.O.H for (living) marine

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭who what when


    So he managed to kill numerous people who were trying to defend their homeland from an invading army with far superior armour and firearms and he gets called a hero? Im sure the british considered Cromwell a hero too!

    Mercenary - yes
    Brainwashed fool - possibly
    Hero - not a chance


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 343 ✭✭kielmanator


    So he managed to kill numerous people who were trying to defend their homeland from an invading army with far superior armour and firearms and he gets called a hero? Im sure the british considered Cromwell a hero too!

    Mercenary - yes
    Brainwashed fool - possibly
    Hero - not a chance

    are you playing devils advocate or just trolling?:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭Antomus Prime


    So he managed to kill numerous people who were trying to defend their homeland from an invading army with far superior armour and firearms and he gets called a hero? Im sure the british considered Cromwell a hero too!

    Mercenary - yes
    Brainwashed fool - possibly
    Hero - not a chance

    Mercenary???

    He's a marine, not a mercanary!! His regardless of your opinion of their actions and reasons for being there the man saved all those people, put his own life at risk (even more so than he was already at) to save them. That is a Hero!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭RMD


    So he managed to kill numerous people who were trying to defend their homeland from an invading army with far superior armour and firearms and he gets called a hero? Im sure the british considered Cromwell a hero too!

    Mercenary - yes
    Brainwashed fool - possibly
    Hero - not a chance

    I suggest you read into the Taliban, what they stand and what their beliefs are on civil liberties / women's rights before calling the coalitions forces the bad guys. If you're pro-Taliban in this war, you're pro fascism. This isn't a war like the North where the rebels were a group of "freedom fighters" or whatever you wish to call them, the rebels in this case are a group of Islamic fanatics trying to bring Afghanistan under their control so they can enforce their own beliefs. If you wish to refer to a group as "defenders of their homeland", the Afghan National Army would be the most suitable bunch, of which Sgt. Meyer saved 23.

    Congratulations to Sgt. Meyer. On an unrelated question, is it just me or do the American armed forces promote to Sgt at a much quicker rate?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 831 ✭✭✭who what when


    are you playing devils advocate or just trolling?:rolleyes:
    What i wrote is my opinion. Yes i do realise that opinions like mine are unlikely to be popular in the military forum but its my opinion non the less.
    Mercenary???

    He's a marine, not a mercanary!!
    Well mercenary in the sense that he's being paid to fight.
    RMD wrote: »
    I suggest you read into the Taliban, what they stand and what their beliefs are on civil liberties / women's rights before calling the coalitions forces the bad guys.
    Im aware of the Taliban and their beliefs. The Afgan National Army are essentially just a puppet of the U.S. Just because a country has laws and beliefs that differ from our own does not give us the right to invade them! Theres other ways and means! And no, im most certainly not pro-Taliban, im anti-war!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭iceage


    So he managed to kill numerous people who were trying to defend their homeland from an invading army with far superior armour and firearms and he gets called a hero? Im sure the british considered Cromwell a hero too!

    Mercenary - yes
    Brainwashed fool - possibly
    Hero - not a chance

    Blinding post that, you must have waited for ages to have all that ammo to throw at one sitting.

    Anti-Brit. The Cromell jibe.
    Anti-Military. The Merc jibe.
    Anti-American. The Marine and Hero jibe.

    I take it President Obama is a very bad man as well is he? Is that because its been decided to award this guy, one of only three living recipients the Medal of Honor, or is it because hes been so naughty to the Taliban and their beliefs that you are so aware of?

    "Yes i do realise that opinions like mine are unlikely to be popular in the military forum but its my opinion non the less". What ever gave you that impression?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,029 ✭✭✭Wicklowrider


    What i wrote is my opinion. Yes i do realise that opinions like mine are unlikely to be popular in the military forum but its my opinion non the less.
    !
    Your opinion is as valuable as anyone else's, at least in my book. Many of us posting in this forum took an oath to uphold the constitution that affords you that right.

    If you read the article, and I do realise I am taking it on face value, It says He is being recognised for saving his comrades.
    As an ex soldier and ex firefighter I can't help giving a nod to anyone who puts their comrades safety before their own. Apologies if that offends.
    I also thought it novel that a Sergeant got to have a beer with the president - don't read that to be anything more than the simple observation is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,798 ✭✭✭Local-womanizer


    Well mercenary in the sense that he's being paid to fight.

    All them Irish soldiers in the Leb are mercs?! News to me!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,049 ✭✭✭discus


    Well mercenary in the sense that he's being paid to fight.

    So every soldier is a mercenary?

    You're a *un*.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,195 ✭✭✭goldie fish


    All them Irish soldiers in the Leb are mercs?! News to me!

    Using the twisted logic of that "person" every soldier is a merc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,818 ✭✭✭Evade


    RMD wrote: »
    On an unrelated question, is it just me or do the American armed forces promote to Sgt at a much quicker rate?
    It seems that the minimum time to reach Sergeant under normal circumstances is 24 months in service and 12 months as a Corporal. Then promotion depends on a points system.

    It does sound fast but they would probably consider spending years as a Private a little slow.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,647 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    What i wrote is my opinion. Yes i do realise that opinions like mine are unlikely to be popular in the military forum but its my opinion non the less.

    Uhuh. Minority opinions are one thing, but fortunately, I get the veto for trolling. Come back in two weeks.

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭muppet01


    So he managed to kill numerous people who were trying to defend their homeland from an invading army with far superior armour and firearms and he gets called a hero? Im sure the british considered Cromwell a hero too!

    Mercenary - yes
    Brainwashed fool - possibly
    Hero - not a chance

    Love the brainwashed fool bit, he got a beer not 100 virgins in paradise.....
    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭Antomus Prime



    Well mercenary in the sense that he's being paid to fight.

    So does that mean every member of every army, airforce, navy etc are mercanaries??

    What about professional boxers? They get paid to fight.... are they meacanaries too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭muppet01


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercenary
    Hope that educates our friend


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭cyrusdvirus


    they're having a field day over on ah about this.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 2,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Morpheus


    Recce patrol on way to AH.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 2,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Morpheus


    Ok Recce patrol is back...

    JESUS H CHRIST... MY EYES, MY F*CKING EYES

    I cant believe some of the stuff I read, hard to tell whos serious and who's smoking hash whilst typing on that forum.... never again am i going AH


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭cyrusdvirus


    Morphéus wrote: »
    Ok Recce patrol is back...

    JESUS H CHRIST... MY EYES, MY F*CKING EYES

    I cant believe some of the stuff I read, hard to tell whos serious and who's smoking hash whilst typing on that forum.... never again am i going AH

    I know.

    But it's kinda fun to poke some of them with sticks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭RMD


    Evade wrote: »
    It seems that the minimum time to reach Sergeant under normal circumstances is 24 months in service and 12 months as a Corporal. Then promotion depends on a points system.

    It does sound fast but they would probably consider spending years as a Private a little slow.

    True, but my understanding for the BA is it takes on average 10-12 years to reach Sgt? And generally anywhere from 3-5 years to reach Cpl at a minimum?

    The American system seems to promote through the ranks much quicker.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,818 ✭✭✭Evade


    RMD wrote: »
    True, but my understanding for the BA is it takes on average 10-12 years to reach Sgt? And generally anywhere from 3-5 years to reach Cpl at a minimum?

    The American system seems to promote through the ranks much quicker.
    Could the more rapid promotions in the US have anything to do with having more enlisted/NCO ranks? There are 13 in the US Army compared to the DF's 9 and the BA's 7.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,647 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    RMD wrote: »
    True, but my understanding for the BA is it takes on average 10-12 years to reach Sgt? And generally anywhere from 3-5 years to reach Cpl at a minimum?

    The American system seems to promote through the ranks much quicker.

    Don't forget, the American system also has a lot more ranks to promote through. A US Sergeant performs the same role as a Lance Corporal in the UK. A corporal's position (squad/section leader, of 8-9 men) is filled by a Staff Sergeant in the US. The absolute barest minimum time in service it is possible to have before appointment to SSG in the US is 4 years, and this is under the 'secondary zone' concept which is only available at the discretion of the promotions board. The standard minimum time in service requirement for SSG is seven years, with eight or nine being fairly typical.

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭iceage


    RMD wrote: »
    True, but my understanding for the BA is it takes on average 10-12 years to reach Sgt? And generally anywhere from 3-5 years to reach Cpl at a minimum.

    Well that's Bollocks. Relax RMD not having a pop, waiting for the facts n figures crew to turn up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,818 ✭✭✭Evade


    iceage wrote: »
    Well that's Bollocks. Relax RMD not having a pop, waiting for the facts n figures crew to turn up.
    Facts and figures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭RMD


    Don't forget, the American system also has a lot more ranks to promote through. A US Sergeant performs the same role as a Lance Corporal in the UK. A corporal's position (squad/section leader, of 8-9 men) is filled by a Staff Sergeant in the US. The absolute barest minimum time in service it is possible to have before appointment to SSG in the US is 4 years, and this is under the 'secondary zone' concept which is only available at the discretion of the promotions board. The standard minimum time in service requirement for SSG is seven years, with eight or nine being fairly typical.

    NTM

    Ah that makes perfect sense. I assumed Cpl / Sgt was the same across the board for AAF / BAF.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,984 ✭✭✭Stovepipe


    Hi all,
    Promotion often depends on circumstances. I made corporal in six years in Baldonnel because so many people left in '88 to go to Qantas.Otherwise, it would have taken 8-10 in the DF of the time.In tech positions in the DF, the responsibility often demands an NCO as post-holder, which is why techs get promoted quicker, much to the dismay of "real" soldiers.
    regards
    Stovepipe


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,647 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    That's why I miss the old tech-sergeant and specialist ranks from the US Army. Extra experience or mechanical skill was rewarded by pay and grade and responsibility over lower-grade mechanics, but that did not necessarily grant authority of rank over field soldiers.

    NTM


Advertisement