Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello All, This is just a friendly reminder to read the Forum Charter where you wish to post before posting in it. :)
Hi all, The AutoSave Draft feature is now disabled across the site. The decision to disable the feature was made via a poll last year. The delay in putting it in place was due to a bug/update issue. This should serve as a reminder to manually save your drafts if you wish to keep them. Thanks, The Boards Team.
Hello all! This is just a quick reminder to ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere.

Green Bay Packers Thread

1140141142143144146»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17,340 ✭✭✭✭ Brendan Bendar


    Yes needs to be sorted fairly quickly as you say, and not have it dragging on the whole off season.

    We have had enough of that last season.

    The bones of a good team are there but it needs an overhaul in important areas to have hope of success.

    Could be an awkward season or two for the Packers but staying ‘as you were’ without big change is not an option.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,141 ✭✭✭ Blut2


    An inability to admit that it might be time to move on from Rodgers just wasted half a season, and probably next season on top. This morning the organisation could have been looking at a top 5 draft pick to give an option of taking another QB if needed, with a much better idea of if Love is going to be the QB of the future after seeing him play multiple full games.

    Instead this offseason is likely going to be another limbo where its not quite a rebuild (because we're stuck with Rodgers and his sky high salary and no high draft pick) but also not quite an all-in (because Rodgers is now too old/the rest of the team isn't strong in enough to justify it). And probably a not quite playoffs, not quite tanking, 7 or 8 win season next season as a result.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,340 ✭✭✭✭ Brendan Bendar


    Packers have to take the risk of a couple of mediocre seasons as continuing with the current setup is not an option.

    Its unfortunate but that’s what the payoff is for having two outstanding QBs for the last twenty five ish years, one after the other.

    Very very few teams if any at all can point back to that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,435 ✭✭✭✭ ELM327


    They could have QB3 in the wings now too but havent given him a chance to prove himself. The 49ers under montana are probably the best comparison. They had Young for a couple years and then gave him the reigns. Same as Favre/Rodgers too. They needed to move on last off season. Or a year to year contract. Rodgers could have gone to a more SB challenging team and GB could have began a rebuild. Now it's 12 months later and its the same again. A 500 (approx) season is one of the worst results you can get - the liklihood of getting a top pick in the draft is low and you havent won anything, unless youre in the NFC south of course.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,340 ✭✭✭✭ Brendan Bendar


    Yes that is correct, however at some stage ALL teams have to rebuild, especially those with salary cap restrictions.

    Time moves on to quote the cliche and the trick is to limit the ‘downtime’ to minimum.

    Look at the RAMS Champions last season, nowhere this year.

    Most teams have a place in the sun for a while,but the Packers have fared better than most so let’s not get despondent.

    The big trick is to recover as quickly as possible .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,340 ✭✭✭✭ Brendan Bendar


    Just looked back on the highlights!

    The Jones fumble was the game loser, the Goff rainbow and the catch was the dagger, and the inability to stop Jamaal close to the goal line was the loser.

    Lions were the better more focused team on the night.

    Will the Packers learn any lessons from that game?

    Lessons I learned.

    1 Run blocking needs to be better

    2 Short yardage play needs to be better.

    Lions wanted it more which seems strange .



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭ Jofspring


    The performance against the Vikings and the potential shown makes the rest of this season feel so much worse.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭ cosatron


    In Brett Favre's final six passes as a packer

    He went 2-6 for 12 yards, concluding in a game-sealing, season-ending INT at Lambeau Field.

    In Aaron Rodgers' final six passes this year:

    He went 2-6 for 12 yards, concluding in a game-sealing, season-ending INT at Lambeau Field.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭ boccers


    Just in relation to Rodgers contract. Coming into the season he was the back to back MVP. Is any team going to move on from that? I know hes now 39 but he didn't look like he was in decline at all and the contract was just a way of pushing money into the future so they could add more pieces this year while the SB window was seemingly open.

    For this season I dont think they can bench Rodgers until they are mathematically out of playoff contention which never happened. Being honest if u were betting on one or the other this time last week I'd say the vast majority would hav backed the packers to beat the Lions and make the playoffs. Nobody was saying they should have given Jordan Love a chance last week.

    I also think the Lions being out of contention for a playoff spot worked against us as they had nothing to lose. Theres no way they try that trick play at the end and probably a few 4th down attempts otherwise.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭ cosatron


    well, the soap opera continues. A part of me is sad his leaving but another part of me is excited about Love, he looked good against the eagles and the added cap space could see us get some weapons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,220 ✭✭✭ theoneeyedman


    Is that likely a done deal Rodgers to NYJ?

    Better for the team at this stage imho, been a negative presence over the last 18/24 months overall.



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,435 ✭✭✭✭ ELM327


    I think he's going to the jets for a year, then the vikings for two, before retirement.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭ Jofspring


    No way a Packers qb would do that.


    Looks like the chances are high he will go to the jets. As long as the Packers get good compensation I think it is time to give someone else a chance. No point putting it on the long finger anymore. Might have some nice picks this year and possibly next year and space to bring in some decent free agents. Catch 22 though with Rodgers gone the Packers might be less appealing for some despite the extra cap space.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,340 ✭✭✭✭ Brendan Bendar


    There are some times when one has to bite the bullet on an issue that has been dragging on.

    In my opinion this is the time for the Packers.

    It could very well turn out to be less that successful but all things considered I feel now is the time



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭ Fionn1952


    A fair post, Bren. I'd add that whether it turns out less successful or not, that would hardly be a long term factor given AR12's age.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,340 ✭✭✭✭ Brendan Bendar




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭ Jofspring


    Seeing what the bears got for their number 1 pick, a deal like that would be very nice.



  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭ boccers


    Given Rodgers age and cap situation along with the possibility it will only be a 1 year thing, I think one first round pick would be welcomed by the Packers. Maybe with a conditional pick for next year if he keeps playing. Also once he is traded there will be a massive cap hit for the packers based one what they already paid him. It has been pushed out into the future for years but if he goes it can't be pushed any longer. There will not be a lot of money for FA spending this year.

    I will be sad to see him go and he is definitely my favourite all time but I agree with others that the time has come. They aren't winning the SB in the next few years with him. I presume he will resign for a day in the future to retire a packer and his number will be retired etc. He definitely isn't coming back to the NFC north to play against them like Favre did.

    It looks like Kaeisean Nixon still hasn't been resigned and is hinting at it on social media. If they let him go after so many years of poor kick returning it really will be shocking management. (Unless someone is paying way over the odds for him)



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,809 ✭✭✭ Jofspring


    Nixon staying but looks like Lazard gone to Jets.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭ cosatron


    looks like its over. had some great times and **** times. always felt we had a chance with him in the game but it was time to move on. I felt his play fell off a bit last year without devante or maybe the thumb was bothering him. I hope they get a tightend in the draft and a veteran wide out to help Love.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,340 ✭✭✭✭ Brendan Bendar


    Agree there, badly need a receiving tight end.

    Time for a new start.



Advertisement