Who Would You Employ?

starbelgrade

I recently decided to take on a graduate to work in the office. One of them is a lad.. seems capable enough, good CV, good references & some relevant experience.

The other is a hot young chick, no experience & her third level qualification is not as relevant to the job, but she's a serious bit of eye candy & has a smashing pair of knockers.

So all things considered, who would you employ?

Cill Dara Abu

Hot young chick

well in order to answer this question, I need to know how hot the guy is.

Needler

Does the chick come with a BER cert?

starbelgrade

Deleted User wrote: »

well in order to answer this question, I need to know how hot the guy is.

Better looking than Josh Hartnett, but less handsome than me.

hatrickpatrick

Obviously don't hire the chick, hire the guy and then DATE the chick.
You can't do anything if she works for you without getting sued, anyway...

AnonoBoy

Employ the girl because I know who she is and we're going to use this thread for the upcoming sexual harrassment case and she's promised he half the cash.

sdanseo

Ask yourself, how likely is it that you're gonna be able to bang her?

When you figure out said likelihood, then employ the lad. :P

starbelgrade

Needler wrote: »

Does the chick come with a BER cert?

If she did, she'd be A rated!

starbelgrade

starbelgrade wrote: »

If she did, she'd be A rated!

too energy efficient. you want her to be a C at least, burn that baby up!

Taco Corp

We just got a hot intern into the office. She's absolutely stunning. Hire the hot chick, it'll be worth it.

Naikon

And I wonder why salaried employment is a ****ty way to make a living?

Needler

Surley wrote: »

We just got a hot intern into the office. She's absolutely stunning. Hire the hot chick, it'll be worth it.

anyone from the office get to ride her yet? srsly unless she's a complete slapper and everyone gets a go she's only a distraction

PseudoFamous

Stupid question, the burd is going to cost extra money as she won't know what she's doing. Also, she won't be so purdy in years to come, so best not disappoint yourself.

Sonnenblumen

starbelgrade wrote: »

I recently decided to take on a graduate to work in the office. One of them is a lad.. seems capable enough, good CV, good references & some relevant experience.

The other is a hot young chick, no experience & her third level qualification is not as relevant to the job, but she's a serious bit of eye candy & has a smashing pair of knockers.

So all things considered, who would you employ?

Sad if you think this funny, even sadder if not?

Perhaps you could ask Daddy Fielding to lobby the Gov?:(

cosmicfart

starbelgrade wrote: »

I recently decided to take on a graduate to work in the office. One of them is a lad.. seems capable enough, good CV, good references & some relevant experience.

The other is a hot young chick, no experience & her third level qualification is not as relevant to the job, but she's a serious bit of eye candy & has a smashing pair of knockers.

So all things considered, who would you employ?

If ur the one hiring, its all about the 'interview' and what 'u feel' u can get 'the best' out of these potential employees :cool:

starbelgrade

Sonnenblumen wrote: »

Sad if you think this funny, even sadder if not?

God forbid that someone starts a lighthearted thread in After Hours.

Oh, the shame of it, Joe.

sheesh

starbelgrade wrote: »

I recently decided to take on a graduate to work in the office. One of them is a lad.. seems capable enough, good CV, good references & some relevant experience.

The other is a hot young chick, no experience & her third level qualification is not as relevant to the job, but she's a serious bit of eye candy & has a smashing pair of knockers.

So all things considered, who would you employ?

its time to ask yourself what would silvio do?

http://www.yahind.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/on-silvio-berlusconi-a1a11.jpg

Sonnenblumen

starbelgrade wrote: »

God forbid that someone starts a lighthearted thread in After Hours.

Oh, the shame of it, Joe.

Yeah, did you hear the one about the balding bulging manager trying hard to be funny and ..........?

Nah, I won't bother, already too much stale humour going around.

starbelgrade

Sonnenblumen wrote: »

Yeah, did you hear the one about the balding bulging manager trying hard to be funny and ..........?

Nah, I won't bother, already too much stale humour going around.

Ah please do... come on.. talk to Joe.

Kevin Duffy

Give them a week long trial each. On the Friday of each week, have a debrief over pints with each candidate. Whoever grants the most sexual favours on the Friday gets the job.

Ditch

The bloke. Obviously. He'll then work, full time, helping you rake in the sort of money that'll enable ye to hire a Hot Batch, by the hour. Now and then, as the urge takes ye.

They're called " Escorts ". Perk of the hard working man

Needler

Ditch wrote: »

They're called " Escorts ". Perk of the hatd working man

but ya don't want to be stirring in all of Co. Leitrim's porridge and its better if its free

PK2008

Which one has the big tits again?

Pete M.

If you really have to ask yourself, then mores the pity for you.

Trying to impress the lass with how well you run the show and wanting to impress upon her how you are imparting your sagely and priceless experience would obviously lead to a massive increase in your own productivity, happy daze.

By going with the bloke, you may end up just having the craic and teaching him nothing but bad habits.
You're only conflicted coz you worry what the Missus would think :pac:

Super-Rush

You'll employ whoever your missus tells you to employ.




Sonnemblumen if you don't like it don't read it but dont thread spoil.

starbelgrade

Pete M. wrote: »

If you really have to ask yourself, then mores the pity for you.

Trying to impress the lass with how well you run the show and wanting to impress upon her how you are imparting your sagely and priceless experience would obviously lead to a massive increase in your own productivity, happy daze.

By going with the bloke, you may end up just having the craic and teaching him nothing but bad habits.
You're only conflicted coz you worry what the Missus would think :pac:

Oddly enough, that's an extremely logically reasoned reply!

alwaysadub

Whichever one will go collect your printer paper that the courier leaves at the door.

landsleaving

You sexist pig Belgrade. You should obviously hire the graduate who needs it the most, this unfortunate, unqualified, under-educated young lady. The lad will gain nothing from it anyway. In sum, hire both. Both breasts.

ascanbe

starbelgrade wrote: »

I recently decided to take on a graduate to work in the office. One of them is a lad.. seems capable enough, good CV, good references & some relevant experience.

The other is a hot young chick, no experience & her third level qualification is not as relevant to the job, but she's a serious bit of eye candy & has a smashing pair of knockers.

So all things considered, who would you employ?

I'd hire the lad as, if this girls' two critics are as adept as you suggest, they will eventually undermine her self-esteem and may render her unable to adequately carry out her duties.

cosmicfart

It really depends on what time of the month it is. Your horny. Or she is bleeding. If only the latter then hire 'ur wan' for a week and then 'sack her' and then get back to work!

Tony10

Solved it:- Take on the guy with the good CV (hopefully good worker so) and take on the hot chick as an intern (hence not having to pay her, but getting the chance to get in there).Tell her its a trial period of a couple of weeks(that should be enough time to get chatting to her) and she'll probably get fed up working for free anyways and leave, but you've got your chance.Ta da.

Agricola

Your cock heart says one thing, but your head speaks the truth. You just know that if you hire this young one, she'll be off with womens problems every other Monday and when someone inevitably puts her up the pole, your going to be left with your lad in your hand for 6 months of next year. You know it makes sense.

Phill Ewinn

Hire them both. What odds is it to you like. You're not paying them. I'm getting three graduate English language students to help around the place.

Get them before Topaz snaps up all the free labour.

Pete M.

http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/small/1001/so-when-it-all-fails-trust-spock-startrek-demotivational-poster-1263970907.jpg

Ah logic!

Abi

starbelgrade wrote: »

I recently decided to take on a graduate to work in the office. One of them is a lad.. seems capable enough, good CV, good references & some relevant experience.

The other is a hot young chick, no experience & her third level qualification is not as relevant to the job, but she's a serious bit of eye candy & has a smashing pair of knockers.

So all things considered, who would you employ?

Take on the lad. You'll only have to listen to her bang on about her boyfriend she didn't tell you about, and the next thing you know she'll be demanding sanitary towel boxes for the bathroom. Ya just don't need that shit buddy.

landsleaving

I'm having a lot of sexy office fantasies thanks to this thread. Are there pics of said knockers? Has no one asked for pics yet? Or that you 'GTFO'?

Mr. Denton

I'd hire the qualified one. Hiring the bimbo might end up costing you more than if you just solicited her off the clock yourself.

Caitlinn

starbelgrade wrote: »

I recently decided to take on a graduate to work in the office. One of them is a lad.. seems capable enough, good CV, good references & some relevant experience.

The other is a hot young chick, no experience & her third level qualification is not as relevant to the job, but she's a serious bit of eye candy & has a smashing pair of knockers.

So all things considered, who would you employ?

This is a made up dilemma for the sake of After Hours right? I like to think so. If someone in a managerial role in a business asks this in all seriousness the question shouldn't be which one are you going to hire but rather when are you going to be fired because clearly you shouldn't be in your job, capiche?

ascanbe

Caitlinn wrote: »

This is a made up dilemma for the sake of After Hours right? I like to think so. If someone in a managerial role in a business asks this in all seriousness the question shouldn't be which one are you going to hire but rather when are you going to be fired because clearly you shouldn't be in your job, capiche?

It's unfair to unload such opprobrium on the OP at a time when he's already dealing with the stress of making this crucial decision.

Caitlinn

ascanbe wrote: »

It's unfair to unload such opprobrium on the OP at a time when he's already dealing with the stress of making this crucial decision.

Yeah clearly he is very stressed by this very difficult decision :rolleyes: ... he's asking for it!

landsleaving

Caitlinn wrote: »

Yeah clearly he is very stressed by this very difficult decision :rolleyes: ... he's asking for it!

He's not posting anymore either, she must have said yes then

alwaysadub

landsleaving wrote: »

He's not posting anymore either, she must have said yes then

Or his missus found out and battered him!

ascanbe

landsleaving wrote: »

He's not posting anymore either, she must have said yes then

Perhaps he's just taken some time out to think about one of the candidates and perform some manual research, in order to ascertain that said candidates' credentials are as impressive as he remembers.

starbelgrade

Caitlinn wrote: »

This is a made up dilemma for the sake of After Hours right? I like to think so. If someone in a managerial role in a business asks this in all seriousness the question shouldn't be which one are you going to hire but rather when are you going to be fired because clearly you shouldn't be in your job, capiche?

It's not a made up dilemma at all, though it may be slightly exaggerated.

Hardly the point though... I run my own business, so I'm free to hire whoever I like. But I'm sure that in the "business world", these "dilemmas" pop up all the time.

There's all sorts of laws & regulations regarding employing the most "suitable" candidate, but there's loads of times where the most suitable candidate is the hottest - regardless of their capabilities (or indeed their sex).

The "Oh, how could you even ask that question?" reaction by some posters is a tad naive, because when it comes down to it, if you get to the truth of the matter, an employee will employ whoever they want and for whatever reasons they want, regardless of whatever regulations or "norms" anyone else thinks should apply.

Tl:dr.. titties trumps willies / willy trumps titties (depending on your preference).

landsleaving

starbelgrade wrote: »

Tl:dr.. titties trumps willies / willy trumps titties (depending on your preference).

Load of arse if you ask me

starbelgrade

landsleaving wrote: »

Load of arse if you ask me

We are the cheeky girls... touch my bum.

They seemed like nice lassies. I wonder if they're job hunting atm....

Caitlinn

starbelgrade wrote: »

It's not a made up dilemma at all, though it may be slightly exaggerated.

Hardly the point though... I run my own business, so I'm free to hire whoever I like. But I'm sure that in the "business world", these "dilemmas" pop up all the time.

There's all sorts of laws & regulations regarding employing the most "suitable" candidate, but there's loads of times where the most suitable candidate is the hottest - regardless of their capabilities (or indeed their sex).

The "Oh, how could you even ask that question?" reaction by some posters is a tad naive, because when it comes down to it, if you get to the truth of the matter, an employee will employ whoever they want and for whatever reasons they want, regardless of whatever regulations or "norms" anyone else thinks should apply.

Tl:dr.. titties trumps willies / willy trumps titties (depending on your preference).

Ok, employ the one with the 'titties' then but don't wonder when everything starts to turn to s**t. Experience counts for a lot in most peoples opinions. I guess you just have to ask yourself, what is more important to you the success of your business or eye candy?

landsleaving

starbelgrade wrote: »

We are the cheeky girls... touch my bum.

They seemed like nice lassies. I wonder if they're job hunting atm....

One of them married a politician. Aslan were right all along....


These are the hands of a tired man.

starbelgrade

Caitlinn wrote: »

Ok, employ the one with the titties, don't wonder when everything starts to turn to s**t. Experience counts for a lot in most peoples opinions. I guess you just have to ask yourself, what is more important to you the success of your business or eye candy?

I'm not sure - I'm going to go by the poll results.

landsleaving

Caitlinn wrote: »

Ok, employ the one with the titties, don't wonder when everything starts to turn to s**t. Experience counts for a lot in most peoples opinions. I guess you just have to ask yourself, what is more important to you the success of your business or eye candy?

Sometimes eye candy is good for business. He might own a branch of Hooters.