Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gay Pride - Embarrassing or Empowering?

  • 23-06-2011 1:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭


    This thread is inspired by a Dublin Radio show discussing this today, with the iniment Pride Parade happening on Saturday in Dublin, I would like to know boardsies, do you find the Pride Parade to be Embarrassing, Empowering, or Do you give a sh1t? do you all know what it REALLY stands for? not just an excuse for a small minority to get dressed up in silly clothes. I'm gonna post this exact same thread in After Hours so I can compare the answers as the Dublin radio station did say that there are some LGBT people who find it embarrassing.

    So good people of LGBT Boards let me know how you feel.

    The Poll has an spoil option of Artari Jaguar, (keeping with AH Traditions)

    Pride Parde, Empowering or Embarassing? 112 votes

    Empowering
    0% 0 votes
    Embarrassing
    41% 46 votes
    Don't Care
    46% 52 votes
    Atari Jaguar
    12% 14 votes


«1

Comments

  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 42,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beruthiel


    Well, when I was a young wan, the G or H word was never, ever mentioned. Those kind of people didn't exist. I can't even remember when I learned that they did!
    So, considering that, I think it a great advancement, that in my life time, Ireland has come a long way. As there is still a bit to go yet, I think that it's still relevant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭diddlybit


    :eek: That's a contentious issue Rochey84. Have a read of this, you'll find it enlightning. http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056278290

    Pride is a really, really divisive issue...for the life of me I can't think why, but it has something to do with the politics of representation, who represents who and how responsible that image is when projected into the mainstream media.

    For a really contraversial thread you should have accompanied your poll with an image of a buff greased up topless man. ;)

    Good idea though, I'm really interested to see what the AHers have to say.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,315 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    We're here, we're queer get used to it.


    At least today's kids know there are gay people like them in the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,156 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    rochey84 wrote: »
    not just an excuse for a small minority to get dressed up in silly clothes.

    That's just it - a small minority of the parade are dressed - NOT the entire parade

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭diddlybit


    spurious wrote: »
    At least today's kids know there are gay people like them in the world.

    Excellent point, there are still a lot of isolated young people who feel like they're the only gay in the village. I was one, but this was way before internet access was everywhere. My only perception of otehr gay people was GCN which appeared in the local library for three months and then disappeared. :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭rochey84


    Johnnymcg wrote: »
    That's just it - a small minority of the parade are dressed - NOT the entire parade

    That was one of the major points I wanted to hammer home, that small minority are the ones who appear in the papers and tv, so is it that small minority (a man with angel wings for example which I think may be ironic) emabarrassing and bringing down the intial point of the parade?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭diddlybit


    Johnnymcg wrote: »
    That's just it - a small minority of the parade are dressed - NOT the entire parade

    Everyone always focuses on the clothes and costumes. :confused: I think that the ladies are protesting too much, there must be something in it.

    Also, Rochey (and no offense intended here at all), but the OP and poll is a little loaded. In AH a lot of the respondees are citing that it's embaressing, whereas I could be pretty sure that this is the first time some of them have ever given any thoughts to Pride. Possibly a different choice of wording would be better- empowering or redundant perhaps?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭rochey84


    diddlybit wrote: »
    Everyone always focuses on the clothes and costumes. :confused: I think that the ladies are protesting too much, there must be something in it.

    Also, Rochey (and no offense intended here at all), but the OP and poll is a little loaded. In AH a lot of the respondees are citing that it's embaressing, whereas I could be pretty sure that this is the first time some of them have ever given any thoughts to Pride. Possibly a different choice of wording would be better- empowering or redundant perhaps?

    But its the nature of the people who dress up who make it embarrassing for the LGBT community, its not redunant because we don't have full equal status in the eyes of the law


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,026 ✭✭✭diddlybit


    rochey84 wrote: »
    But its the nature of the people who dress up who make it embarrassing for the LGBT community, its not redunant because we don't have full equal status in the eyes of the law

    You'd be surprsied at how many people think it's completely redundant though. I understand that you feel that full equality hasn't been achieved and that it is difficult for LGBT couples to be out in public and I agree with you on this. But some people, including members of the LGBT community, feel that these things are no longer issues and fell that the levels of homophobia and discrimination no longer warrent Pride or any form of media or politicial attention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,156 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    diddlybit wrote: »
    Everyone always focuses on the clothes and costumes. :confused: I think that the ladies are protesting too much, there must be something in it.


    Sigh..... I have been to about 8 pride parades in Dublin and 2 or 3 in Belfast - Yes some people dress up flamboyantly - SO BLOODY WHAT? - The vast majority are dressed up as they normally would. Now the Media might pick out the flamboyant dressers but so bloody what?

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 42,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beruthiel


    Johnnymcg wrote: »
    Yes some people dress up flamboyantly - SO BLOODY WHAT?

    Indeed.
    Nobody slags the people who go to the Carnival parade in Rio de Janeiro. Now that's flamboyant!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭apache


    i have made an executive decision not to attend pride this year. which is a shame because i automatically booked that weekend off work.
    i know i will let down some people but this is an executive decision well thought out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭Chuchoter


    I think Pride, as a concept, is good but I don't think its executed particularly well. It seems like an excuse to get really drunk and make businesses a lot of money. Politics seem to be gone out of it, and I don't really like the way the biggest representation of us in this country isn't particularly angry. I mean the posters this year are a load of randomers with LGBTQ in tiny writing, which is slightly worrying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 285 ✭✭Moon Indigo


    Been to a few prides now including last year and I'm still in limbo about it. There are many minority groups in the LGBT community and for that reason I feel it is a good day. Its nice to have that time to be your self but I think it depends on were you are in your life. If you feel the need or whatever to do the whole thing then its great.
    I went last year and it was a total drunkfest with pubs open all day and couldnt help feeling like alot of cashing in and ripping off was going on. It makes me wonder if the pride stoped what would the financial ramifications be for Dublin/Pubs? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 452 ✭✭Platinum2010


    Having never been to a pride parade .I cant say but I find it symbolic in a way.

    when them do -good Christians come out with their plaquards and expect people to take notice of them ,we see people lining the streets to see how we as a society have come along way from the days of utter ignorance towards the community . The people who standby to watch the parade are also good ,it shows their willingness to embrace change and support regardless of oppression from other groups .

    Plus its colourful :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 318 ✭✭rochey84


    I think Pride, as a concept, is good but I don't think its executed particularly well. It seems like an excuse to get really drunk and make businesses a lot of money. Politics seem to be gone out of it, and I don't really like the way the biggest representation of us in this country isn't particularly angry. I mean the posters this year are a load of randomers with LGBTQ in tiny writing, which is slightly worrying.

    Just to pick up on your point about politics, I believe that Sen. David Norris will be appearing and speaking at the Party in the Park following the parade.

    Also on another note the Grand Marshall of the parade this year is Michael Barron one of the founders of BeLonGTo (I think)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭Chuchoter


    rochey84 wrote: »
    Just to pick up on your point about politics, I believe that Sen. David Norris will be appearing and speaking at the Party in the Park following the parade.

    Also on another note the Grand Marshall of the parade this year is Michael Barron one of the founders of BeLonGTo (I think)

    I mean political in the way the march for marriage is political. Pride is effectively a big party that makes people a lot of money.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,285 ✭✭✭BanzaiBk


    Johnnymcg wrote: »
    Sigh..... I have been to about 8 pride parades in Dublin and 2 or 3 in Belfast - Yes some people dress up flamboyantly - SO BLOODY WHAT? - The vast majority are dressed up as they normally would. Now the Media might pick out the flamboyant dressers but so bloody what?

    MTE


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 106 ✭✭GalwayGuy92


    I'm still incredibly undecided on the whole "pride" thing. On one hand I see that it is an opportunity to show people that the LGBT community is not scary and that the members aren't faceless monsters and the spawn of Satan. One the other hand even the word 'pride' conjures images of scantily clad men dancing around the streets. Which makes me cringe almost immediately as they attract the most attention, and although being upstanding citizens will be percieved by many as what all gays look like and act like, which can be negative in the minds of the (somewhat) closed-minded Irish public.

    My opinion is still undecided, even throughout writing this post I've changed my mind numerous times as to my point. There are both positive and negatives to pride but I do admire the confidence of those who march and I respect them a lot, I just hope that al of those who march realise that it is not an excuse to get trollied but rather a chance to show that being gay is not a disease nor an aberration in society.
    Well, that's what I think it could be but I may be mistaken having never been to an actual parade, although one did go past me in Galway. Shopping with m mother at the time I looked away embarrassed trying to to look too closely in case she copped on :o:o.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 alan1695


    I just don't see the point of pride! Why should we have to parade down the street?

    Most people don't care whether u r gay or str8 nowadays!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭apache


    alan1695 wrote: »
    I just don't see the point of pride! Why should we have to parade down the street?

    Most people don't care whether u r gay or str8 nowadays!
    after going to the pride parade and waving my flag for the past 15 years i agree with you. its only scummers that have a problem and they are below me to even care.
    people don't care. i will be sitting this one out especially if the people that go to it are trying to be representative of me. i find them embarrassing and nauseating.
    that and the fact that the bars are packed and you have to wait half an hour to get served and because of all the "friends" of gays you cannot get into the civic offices anymore after pride.

    and its way too messy. just a drunken pissup. half of them don't even know what they are marching for!

    i used to love it. i abhor it now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 452 ✭✭Platinum2010


    Fm104 debate on pride


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    alan1695 wrote: »
    Most people don't care whether u r gay or str8 nowadays!
    You're right: people don't care, by and large. However, more worrisome is that administration does care. It cares a whole lot. That's what "Pride" (ffs...) should be about: changing the law, not perceptions. Lord knows no perceptions get changed by the quiltbags parading their wares/selves down Dame Edna Street. I guess that's what people mean about the political; the Pride lads and lassies are barking up every effing tree except the one that always barks back. I can walk down the street 365 with my boyfriend (yay! - but I'm still gonna march for that right dammit), and nine out of ten people don't expect me to be an awesome dancing shopaholic permanently coked up on meth (nobody gives two shits about drag queens giving beer to mid-teenagers from a limo though right? Pride oh-five hollaaa). Oh, but I can't marry this dude who, like, I've just been goin' out with and all for four years. Meh, don't care. *gyration* (me gusta)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,512 ✭✭✭baby and crumble


    I find pride weird and embarassing for a number of reasons.

    Johnny, you mentioned something about who cares if the minority dress up- I do. Not because I think they shouldn't do that if they want to. I care because for thousands of people, particularly outside Dublin, the fact that the only photos that will be in the newspapers about pride will be those men dressed as angels, etc. That makes it far more difficult for a GAA playing son to come out to the parents who see that and only see the sparkles.

    I care because they are made represent me in the media. It reinforces stereotypes which for some people are true, and that's cool, but people's assumptions are built around stereotypes and that can make life very difficult.

    It's also hypocritical. It's meant to e pride, be proud of our uniqueness, but unless you fit certain stereotypes, then kiss goodbye to your night.

    I also hate pride cos I hate crowds of drunken people, so it's never really going to be a runner for me...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,044 ✭✭✭gcgirl


    Zoegh you must be getting mixed up with paddies day, went to the previous 2 parades and there were no drunk idiots plenty of ordinary people with their partners and kids, last year i brought the kids they loved it but personally thwarting only way of judging something is being there and witnessing it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 alan1695


    apache wrote: »
    after going to the pride parade and waving my flag for the past 15 years i agree with you. its only scummers that have a problem and they are below me to even care.
    people don't care......


    I agree with you. Have done the pride thing a few times but am really not to bothered about it.

    But, for those that are going to it - enjoy and have fun!

    Hope the weather is a lot better than today - lashing rain all day here in Limerick!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 181 ✭✭CluelessGirl


    I really think that people need to realise that their sexuality does not define who they are as a person.

    Personally I would not be into Pride.

    But if it gives people happiness, joy or pleasure sure why not. Go and have fun because I am sure it will be a great event.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭easychair


    The original reason for a march was to demonstrate against unfairness, inequality and persecution. Since those far off days, we have gay civil partnership, equality legislation enshrined in law, and as far as I can see the (vast) majority of society is now relaxed about alternative lifestyles and gay people in general. Being gay is now as normal in society as, (I've said it before here) a bag of fish and chips.

    I rejoice in that, and rejoice that nowadays sexuality is no longer an issue.

    Nowadays, the march seems to be about trying to stress that gay people are different, and I don't think that's healthy. We have achieved so much, as a society, that the point of the march seems to be lost and the march appears to be a march for its own sake, much like the St Patricks day march.

    The emphasis of all of us ought to be about stressing that we are just a normal part of the wider society. I worry that those who like to exercise their leadership are now doing more harm than good, in demonstrating that gay people are apart from everyone else. We should be proud that gay people are not different, but are just as normal as anyone else.

    For me, the point of a pride march is now old fashioned and out of date, and does more harm than good, and it's time to quietly forget acting as if gay people are somehow different to everyone else.

    Rejoice that gay people are now just as normal s everyone else, and we should start behaving in that way too, rather than inventing differences which no longer exist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭Chuchoter


    easychair wrote: »
    The original reason for a march was to demonstrate against unfairness, inequality and persecution. Since those far off days, we have gay civil partnership, equality legislation enshrined in law, and as far as I can see the (vast) majority of society is now relaxed about alternative lifestyles and gay people in general. Being gay is now as normal in society as, (I've said it before here) a bag of fish and chips.

    I rejoice in that, and rejoice that nowadays sexuality is no longer an issue.

    Nowadays, the march seems to be about trying to stress that gay people are different, and I don't think that's healthy. We have achieved so much, as a society, that the point of the march seems to be lost and the march appears to be a march for its own sake, much like the St Patricks day march.

    The emphasis of all of us ought to be about stressing that we are just a normal part of the wider society. I worry that those who like to exercise their leadership are now doing more harm than good, in demonstrating that gay people are apart from everyone else. We should be proud that gay people are not different, but are just as normal as anyone else.

    For me, the point of a pride march is now old fashioned and out of date, and does more harm than good, and it's time to quietly forget acting as if gay people are somehow different to everyone else.

    Rejoice that gay people are now just as normal s everyone else, and we should start behaving in that way too, rather than inventing differences which no longer exist.

    If I'm honest, I think you're living in fantasy land. We have miles to go as regards LGBT rights. We have no marriage rights, its still ok to openly ridicule us and we are treated frankly pretty **** in schools. Pride as it stands doesn't tackle these issues, but thats its own fault, not that there isn't anything to tackle. We will never be a normal part of society for a very, very long time. If we could get to being a happy novelty I'd be fine with that, but at the same time I don't want to go down the road of 'We're just like you, straight people!' because that excludes an awful lot of people who fall outside of heteronormative ideals.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭mollzer


    I marched with a group of friends 4 years ago, felt great because I had just 'come out'. I stopped thinking I was the 'only gay in the village', which I had for years, growing up in a rural area with a strict Catholic upbringing didnt help.

    But then my partner & I brought my kids to Dublin pride 2 years ago, we wanted them to realise we werent the only gay people in Ireland!
    Guess what they remembered about the day? 2 guys dressed in half a tux each, my youngest even asked me if he was wearing any underwear, cos all we could see was his bare legs under his jacket. And then there was the condom ad float, and the drag queens...........more questions.
    So we decided that the pride parade was no longer suitable for our kids, more Mardi Gras than Gay Pride!

    Watched the six one news on RTE this evening to see how the parade went today, it got about 2 mins news and guess what was the last thing we see in the clip? a young fella dressed in gold hotpants and a tiny top!

    NOT the image I want my kids or my parents to see as representative of Gay pride.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Ambersky


    I agree with crayolastereo that not all gay rights have been won and that even when we reach full legal equality there will be work to be done, ongoing work, for the rights of LGBT people as the minority that we are to be respected.

    In honour of the day thats in it I think maybe it would be useful to be reminded of where Pride comes from and that all the arguments we are having here about it were arguments people put forward way back then as well.
    Right from the beginning of LGBT activism and people just looking to be treated equally to others there have been arguments about the best tactics to achieve this.
    Some wanted to go the respectable route and prove we are no different than anyone else and found the drag queens, the butch dykes, the trannys the effeminate men etc all to embarassing and detrimental to the cause they were trying to achieve.
    Some said all this respectibility and keeping your head down just isnt working
    and besides we are different, we are diverse and we like our differences and dont want to tell people to stop being who they are just cos they are embarassing to some people.
    In my opinion it isnt an either or situation we need both approaches.
    Sometimes the clean respectable approach works and thanks are due to those who do that work and sometimes you just have to say get the f**k out of my way, and that can work too.

    Ill put up a few quotes to illustrate my point from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots
    Long post so just skip it if its of no interest to you.

    Also there is an interesting documentary on this history the trailer to it can be seen here


    Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and police departments kept lists of known homosexuals, their favored establishments, and friends; the U.S. Post Office kept track of addresses where material pertaining to homosexuality was mailed.[9] State and local governments followed suit: bars catering to homosexuals were shut down, and their customers were arrested and exposed in newspapers. Cities performed "sweeps" to rid neighborhoods, parks, bars, and beaches of gays. They outlawed the wearing of opposite gender clothes, and universities expelled instructors suspected of being homosexual.[10] Thousands of gay men and women were publicly humiliated, physically harassed, fired, jailed, or institutionalized in mental hospitals. Many lived double lives, keeping their private lives secret from their professional ones
    in 1953 the Mattachine Organisation working for Gay rights shifted their focus to assimilation and respectability. They reasoned that they would change more minds about homosexuality by proving that gays and lesbians were normal people, no different from heterosexuals.
    On the outer fringes of the few small gay communities were people who challenged gender expectations......They belied the carefully crafted image portrayed by the Mattachine Society and DOB that asserted homosexuals were respectable, normal people.[
    Police raids on gay bars were frequent—occurring on average once a month for each bar......
    At 1:20 in the morning on Saturday, June 28, 1969The raid did not go as planned. Standard procedure was to line up the patrons, check their identification, and have female police officers take customers dressed as women to the bathroom to verify their sex, upon which any men dressed as women would be arrested. Those dressed as women that night refused to go with the officers. Men in line began to refuse to produce their identification. The police decided to take everyone present to the police station, and separated the transvestites in a room in the back of the bar. .
    Both patrons and police recalled that a sense of discomfort spread very quickly, spurred by police who began to "bully" some of the lesbians by "feeling some of them up inappropriately" while frisking them...
    A scuffle broke out when a woman in handcuffs was escorted from the door of the bar to the waiting police wagon several times. She escaped repeatedly and fought with four of the police, swearing and shouting, for about ten minutes. Described as "a typical New York butch" and "a dyke—stone butch", she had been hit on the head by an officer with a billy club for, as one witness claimed, complaining that her handcuffs were too tight.[60] Bystanders recalled that the woman, whose identity remains unknown,[note 3] sparked the crowd to fight when she looked at bystanders and shouted, "Why don't you guys do something?" After an officer picked her up and heaved her into the back of the wagon,[61] the crowd became a mob and went "berserk": "It was at that moment that the scene became explosive
    We all had a collective feeling like we'd had enough of this kind of ****. It wasn't anything tangible anybody said to anyone else, it was just kind of like everything over the years had come to a head on that one particular night in the one particular place, and it was not an organized demonstration.... Everyone in the crowd felt that we were never going to go back. It was like the last straw. It was time to reclaim something that had always been taken from us.
    Not everyone in the gay community considered the revolt a positive development. To many older gays and many members of the Mattachine Society that had worked throughout the 1960s to promote homosexuals as no different from heterosexuals, the display of violence and effeminate behavior was embarrassing. Randy Wicker, who had marched in the first gay picket lines before the White House in 1965, said the "screaming queens forming chorus lines and kicking went against everything that I wanted people to think about homosexuals ... that we were a bunch of drag queens in the Village acting disorderly and tacky and cheap.
    Historian Lillian Faderman calls the riots the "shot heard round the world", explaining, "The Stonewall Rebellion was crucial because it sounded the rally for that movement. It became an emblem of gay and lesbian power. By calling on the dramatic tactic of violent protest that was being used by other oppressed groups, the events at the Stonewall implied that homosexuals had as much reason to be disaffected as they.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭apache


    i am very aware of the history and blood, sweat and tears that was spilled to get us where we are today.
    this was the first gay pride i didn't attend in many years and i don't think i will attend again for the simple reason more that half of the people there haven't a clue what they are marching for. its just a big street party for them and a piss up.

    gay rights is not indicative of making a tit of yourself and puking down the alley outside the george or the flounge or pantibar.

    they are after all representing us as a whole. we are all diverse. nobody represents anybody else yet we are all lumped in together.

    the straights love it. they think we are a spectacle to behold and have a great day out. oh the gays are just so funny! :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭deirdre_dub


    apache wrote: »
    i am very aware of the history and blood, sweat and tears that was spilled to get us where we are today.
    this was the first gay pride i didn't attend in many years and i don't think i will attend again for the simple reason more that half of the people there haven't a clue what they are marching for. its just a big street party for them and a piss up.

    gay rights is not indicative of making a tit of yourself and puking down the alley outside the george or the flounge or pantibar.

    they are after all representing us as a whole. we are all diverse. nobody represents anybody else yet we are all lumped in together.

    the straights love it. they think we are a spectacle to behold and have a great day out. oh the gays are just so funny! :rolleyes:
    Well, I was on the parade yesterday.

    I was marching for trans rights - I was holding a placquard that I put together earlier on in the day in the TENI offices. It wasn't that much of a street party for me - though it was good to spend time with friends, many of whom were also holding placquards or banners. I didn't make a tit of myself, and I didn't puke once all day. As for the straights - the only reaction that I'm aware of that I got from straights was as we were heading to the parade, when someone shouted "spot the fscking f*ggot" at us.

    So maybe you would like to re-consider the way that you are lumping those who attend pride parades together? :rolleyes: :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭apache


    Well, I was on the parade yesterday.

    I was marching for trans rights - I was holding a placquard that I put together earlier on in the day in the TENI offices. It wasn't that much of a street party for me - though it was good to spend time with friends, many of whom were also holding placquards or banners. I didn't make a tit of myself, and I didn't puke once all day. As for the straights - the only reaction that I'm aware of that I got from straights was as we were heading to the parade, when someone shouted "spot the fscking f*ggot" at us.

    So maybe you would like to re-consider the way that you are lumping those who attend pride parades together? :rolleyes: :mad:
    no not at all but thanks for asking :D
    there are bound to be people like you. there are bound to be people like me and there are bound to be people representing the straights.

    its called the law of averages and does not represent any group fully.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Ambersky


    No apache my long post was not just about the history of blood sweat and tears.
    It was saying look at how simular the arguments against the Gay Pride Parade are.
    Even back then, right from the beginning, some people were embarassed by it.
    Randy Wicker, said
    in 1965, said the "screaming queens forming chorus lines and kicking went against everything that I wanted people to think about homosexuals ... that we were a bunch of drag queens in the Village acting disorderly and tacky and cheap.
    apache said
    gay rights is not indicative of making a tit of yourself and puking down the alley outside the george or the flounge or pantibar.
    they are after all representing us as a whole. we are all diverse. nobody represents anybody else yet we are all lumped in together.

    Same argument.
    Well the drunk part is the same as straights, Paddys day, Mardi Gras, etc any parade in fact has its drunken element.
    You may be ashamed of the behaviour and get up of some people and prefer to present to straight society an image that we are all just like them, but we are not all just like them.
    The people who only want to present that respectable just like everyone else image, without those embarassing Queens, Trannys, drunken pretty boys, Dykes, Butches, etc. get plenty of time to do just that.
    Fantastic that they do and you will see many respectable looking and behaving people working for all kinds of LGBT organisations and doing great work.

    Pride parade commemorates an occasion when those who were on the outer fringes said No I Have Every Right To Be Here Too and took to the streets.
    It isnt a commemoration of a day when the Conservative Branch of the INLGF won a legal battle or the day when two ordinary looking gay men kissed in a straight bar and werent told to get out.

    I was on the parade too.
    Holding a teachers banner with my union president. There were only two LGBT members from my union at the march but its a beginning.
    Teaching unions are important at pride because many teachers feel particularly vulnerable as they are not fully protected by equality legislation which allows an exemption, section 37, for people employed by religious run organisations.
    On my way home a couple of hours after the crowd had dispersed I saw two women holding hands walking down Henry Street and they were verbally harassed by a gang of youths.
    The streets still arent ours every day yet.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,488 ✭✭✭Goodshape


    Ambersky wrote: »
    Well the drunk part is the same as straights, Paddys day, Mardi Gras, etc any parade in fact has its drunken element.

    But Gay Pride isn't the same as Paddy's Day or Mardi Gras. Nobody is questioning the rights of Irish People.. and Mardi Gras is just Mardi Gras. They are street parties. I guess I'd like Gay Pride to be a bit pointful, a bit more respectable, instead of just a spectacle.

    I'm sure it's horses for courses but images of the parade did me no favours while coming to terms with my own sexuality.

    And while I've never had a negative reaction coming out to someone -- the only common annoyance being an assumption that I've suddenly become a shopaholic pop-loving princess -- I have been turned away at the door on a few occasions from both the George and the Dragon for apparently not looking gay enough.

    On one occasion I had to stand there like a tool and call my boyfriend at the time out of the club to come and "prove" to the bouncer that I really am gay. Pretty ****ing humiliating.

    I just can't help but see the majority of Pride celebrations as reinforcing that specific idea of what "gay" looks like. And I've never subscribed to that idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭apache


    Ambersky wrote: »





    You may be ashamed of the behaviour and get up of some people and prefer to present to straight society an image that we are all just like them, but we are not all just like them.

    yes thats what i'm saying. i am me - nobody else. but then again if straight people are just going to educate themselves on what they see during pride i think i have a valid point. my whole point is we are all different.




    I was on the parade too.
    Holding a teachers banner with my union president. There were only two LGBT members from my union at the march but its a beginning.
    Teaching unions are important at pride because many teachers feel particularly vulnerable as they are not fully protected by equality legislation which allows an exemption, section 37, for people employed by religious run organisations.
    On my way home a couple of hours after the crowd had dispersed I saw two women holding hands walking down Henry Street and they were verbally harassed by a gang of youths.
    The streets still arent ours every day yet.

    i am well aware the streets aren't ours. i am glad at least 2 of your union reps were there. more than can ever be said for mine.i am out in my job. well i don't lie so if someone asks they know the truth and i correct people if they ask me about men, partners etc. i suppose i am out by default.

    it is no easy feat and i feel i do a lot by just being out to everybody especially as my colleagues and clients are extremely homophobic.

    can i ask if as a teacher you were out in the workplace (although i personally don't feel the need to discuss these things) what would happen? surely equality law would override that archaic section 37? i know a few teachers like me who are out by default to their colleagues. they haven't been sacked so far.

    edit - i made a mess of the quote there at the first response but you can still understand it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Ambersky


    apache good for you being out to colleagues and clients.
    Anyone being out is doing their bit for LGBT visibility and in their own way breaking down the walls of silence and ignorance.
    Im not saying that the respectable people among us are not doing a fine job putting forward a good image of what it means to be LGBT.

    Im saying like it or not there is another image than the respectable just like anyone else image, because there are other kinds of people who are LGBT.
    Some people may not like that or be embarassed by it but they are part of our community too, thats what the rainbow flag is about diversity.
    If you look at the film clip or read my first post or the link I gave you will see it was precisely these people on the fringes that revolted and took to the streets in Stonewall and in a way, as a heritage, this is their day.

    I can understand the feeling sometimes of being at the parade and wondering what is all this about and looking around and realising half the people there dont know what it is about.
    I understand the feeling but what I have written previously is what I remind myself it is about.

    apache there wasnt an LGBT support group in my union and then we saw the need for one and created one.
    In answer to your question re job security of teachers if out I dont want to make the situation worse by suggesting dismissal would be an automatic consequence.
    Section 37 is part of the equality act, its an exemption within it, it doesnt overide it
    Some LGBT teachers are out and it is fine but I dont wish to go off topic so if you wish to find out more on the issue read here.
    http://www.gcn.ie/feature.aspx?sectionid=14&articleid=2550
    http://www.mamanpoulet.com/section-37-of-employment-equality-act-raised-at-teachers-conference/#more-6135


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭Chuchoter


    Goodshape wrote: »
    But Gay Pride isn't the same as Paddy's Day or Mardi Gras. Nobody is questioning the rights of Irish People.. and Mardi Gras is just Mardi Gras. They are street parties. I guess I'd like Gay Pride to be a bit pointful, a bit more respectable, instead of just a spectacle.

    I'm sure it's horses for courses but images of the parade did me no favours while coming to terms with my own sexuality.

    And while I've never had a negative reaction coming out to someone -- the only common annoyance being an assumption that I've suddenly become a shopaholic pop-loving princess -- I have been turned away at the door on a few occasions from both the George and the Dragon for apparently not looking gay enough.

    On one occasion I had to stand there like a tool and call my boyfriend at the time out of the club to come and "prove" to the bouncer that I really am gay. Pretty ****ing humiliating.

    I just can't help but see the majority of Pride celebrations as reinforcing that specific idea of what "gay" looks like. And I've never subscribed to that idea.

    Thats my problem as well. I wasn't there yesterday, more down to me not being allowed than anything, but going from the photos I've seen...I'm not seeing much of a point. I see lots of fun costumes, which are great, but no message. At least the screaming queens, whatever people said about not wanting to be represented by them, at the stonewall riots had a point, now its just another opportunity for straight people to go observe the spectacle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,495 ✭✭✭apache


    Ambersky wrote: »
    apache good for you being out to colleagues and clients.
    Anyone being out is doing their bit for LGBT visibility and in their own way breaking down the walls of silence and ignorance.
    Im not saying that the respectable people among us are not doing a fine job putting forward a good image of what it means to be LGBT.

    Im saying like it or not there is another image than the respectable just like anyone else image, because there are other kinds of people who are LGBT.
    Some people may not like that or be embarassed by it but they are part of our community too, thats what the rainbow flag is about diversity.
    If you look at the film clip or read my first post or the link I gave you will see it was precisely these people on the fringes that revolted and took to the streets in Stonewall and in a way, as a heritage, this is their day.

    I can understand the feeling sometimes of being at the parade and wondering what is all this about and looking around and realising half the people there dont know what it is about.
    I understand the feeling but what I have written previously is what I remind myself it is about.

    apache there wasnt an LGBT support group in my union and then we saw the need for one and created one.
    In answer to your question re job security of teachers if out I dont want to make the situation worse by suggesting dismissal would be an automatic consequence.
    Section 37 is part of the equality act, its an exemption within it, it doesnt overide it
    Some LGBT teachers are out and it is fine but I dont wish to go off topic so if you wish to find out more on the issue read here.
    http://www.gcn.ie/feature.aspx?sectionid=14&articleid=2550
    http://www.mamanpoulet.com/section-37-of-employment-equality-act-raised-at-teachers-conference/#more-6135

    i had a reply sent to you but here we go again :(

    yeah thanks for that. i think it is important re visibility.
    i do it all year round not once a year in a good time charlie time re pride parade.
    i was in touch with g-force (we work closely together) but to no avail.
    even they said it was a no go.

    i tried to set up a platform in my job for LGBT people. nobody was interested. i strived for it. i put my heart and soul into it. all the gays were not interested. they can be quite vocal in the locker room and when you talk to them one on one but when they are faced with the thoughts of coming out and fighting for their rights they go back into their shells.

    i have tried. i cannot possibly do this by myself and yet these very people although don't march in the parade certainly go out later that night when all the spotlights have died down and celebrate pride. this is not pride to me.

    i will look at those links another time. thanks. i am interested in them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,512 ✭✭✭baby and crumble


    I have to say, I have been listening to people talk about the parade and the festival this year, and looking at photos and I think it might be time to eat my words, a little... it looks like this years parade and celebrations were a lot different from the few Pride celebrations I have been to before (one in Dublin a good few years ago, and then EuroPride when it was held in London) and Dublin Pride seems to be maturing into something very nice... I've seen lots of posts from straight friends of FB who had great fun and who really supported the parade and all the celebrations.

    I hope everyone had a blast, and I think that I might give Pride a bash next year. :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭Meesared


    Well, I was on the parade yesterday.



    I was marching for trans rights - I was holding a placquard that I put together earlier on in the day in the TENI offices. It wasn't that much of a street party for me - though it was good to spend time with friends, many of whom were also holding placquards or banners. I didn't make a tit of myself, and I didn't puke once all day. As for the straights - the only reaction that I'm aware of that I got from straights was as we were heading to the parade, when someone shouted "spot the fscking f*ggot" at us.



    So maybe you would like to re-consider the way that you are lumping those who attend pride parades together?



    I seen the pics :) Your placards were cool :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 905 ✭✭✭easychair


    If I'm honest, I think you're living in fantasy land. We have miles to go as regards LGBT rights. We have no marriage rights, its still ok to openly ridicule us and we are treated frankly pretty **** in schools. Pride as it stands doesn't tackle these issues, but thats its own fault, not that there isn't anything to tackle. We will never be a normal part of society for a very, very long time. If we could get to being a happy novelty I'd be fine with that, but at the same time I don't want to go down the road of 'We're just like you, straight people!' because that excludes an awful lot of people who fall outside of heteronormative ideals.

    Like all of us, I can only live in the world I experience. My experience in 2011 is that everyone I come across thinks being gay is pretty normal, and thats a huge leap from the intolerant society I remember in earlier times. If you find the opposite, then I am sorry for you, and hope it gets better.

    Individuals in society is prejudiced against all sorts of things, and I can distinguish between institutionalised prejudice, and individual prejudice. I rail against individual prejudice against migrants, travellers, gay people, handicapped people and so on, but no amount of marching is going to change what largely stems from ignorance and fear.

    "Marriage" is a religious concept and I have no desire for that. Gay people now have, largely, the same legal rights and protections as everyone else, and further I find that most people are pretty relaxed about gay people, and really don't think that being gay is an issue.

    Marching for gay pride is, largely, now redundant. In the past we marched for equality and equal recognition, and we have been very successful in achieving what it was we were marching for. Marching now seems to be an end in itself (there is nothing wrong with that), although nowadays there is no agenda, except to march and show solidarity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,305 ✭✭✭Chuchoter


    Marriage isn't just a religious concept. First off, it entails a load of rights we still don't have. It is also a symbol of 'the basis of society' that we're still not allowed into. I don't see equal rights or equal recognition.

    Maybe I'm asking too much, but I'd kind of like to live in a society where 'relaxed' about gay people doesn't just mean 'they're not chasing me with pitchforks' which is what it generally seems to. Of course things are better than they were in years gone by, but is there work left to do? Yes, mountains of it. Legal equality is just the first piece of the puzzle, it will be a long time before people really accept us. Just look at what happened with David Norris, now as much as I'm not his biggest fan and what he said was most certainly wrong, why were people so outraged? Because it goes back to a very deep rooted fear that children aren't safe with gay men. We might be able to convince the law one day that we are equal, but as regards prejudice among normal people, we still have huge issues that are far more widespread than just the lower class or the religious that we might like to think are the source of all the problems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭df1985


    zoegh wrote: »
    I have to say, I have been listening to people talk about the parade and the festival this year, and looking at photos and I think it might be time to eat my words, a little... it looks like this years parade and celebrations were a lot different from the few Pride celebrations I have been to before (one in Dublin a good few years ago, and then EuroPride when it was held in London) and Dublin Pride seems to be maturing into something very nice... I've seen lots of posts from straight friends of FB who had great fun and who really supported the parade and all the celebrations.

    I hope everyone had a blast, and I think that I might give Pride a bash next year. :cool:

    Im the same, I was kind of indifferent to the whole pride thing really, thought it didnt help with sereotypes etc the usual. But I was out saturday night in town and when I got off the bus I said I would purposely walk to wexford street rather than get a cab, just to see what was going on.

    Walked parliament/dame/georges streets and have to say it changed my mind on it a bit. yes the stereotypes were on show, lads in hot pants bla bla but for the most part of was just groups of friends, gay/straight/whatever in a very friendly accepting atmosphere. I looked like one hell of a good party too. My favourite bit was walking past "old man pubs" along the way that had their usual aul lad regulars out having cigarettes with the campest lads on the planet and not a hint of them having any problem with it. A small thing I know but even the older generations are moving on, great to see.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 235 ✭✭TheAnswer


    I don't know about "Gay Pride" but there was certainly no evidence on Saturday night of "Civic Pride", I was disgusted by the dirt and litter and discarded plastic glasses outside the Front Lounge and Turks Head and Panti Bar across on Capel St. Did yiz ever hear of bins?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭alexjk


    My favourite bit of the whole day was seeing an elderly woman in a wheelchair on Dame Street waving a little rainbow flag and looking absolutely delighted. Similarly, I saw another elderly woman having a bit of a dance in her seat outside a cafe on O'Connell Street when one of the club floats went by.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    I was in Paris on Saturday, and lo and behold stumbled upon their Pride march. It was pretty much the same as the ones I've been to in Dublin, except it was smaller. It seems the Parisians don't really need to march. (Incidentally, it's by far the most lesbionic city I've been to. Even in other "gay" cities I've never seen so many women holding hands in the street or what have you.) There was a minor political element to the march - something about a vote in 2012. I'm guessing it's to change the PACS, which is relatively useless. Elsewhere there was something about condoms and abortion. Also the requisite bus with post-prime go-go dancers. Even as a card carrying homo, I was kinda failing to see the point of the procession. There was no theme. The north Africans near me were similarly perplexed.

    Don't get me wrong; it was fun. But it did highlight the absurdity of such a cortege in the most anything-goes place in Europe, in turn emphasising how atm Dublin's biggest battle is one of acceptance and normalisation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,220 ✭✭✭Ambersky


    The French seem to have their own problems too despite the appearance of a very liberal and particular attitude to sex.
    Some, particularly French women, would believe that the tolerance for using others sexually as a kind of entertainment is in need of a bit of questioning.
    This is evident in the reaction to the arrest due to allegations of attempted rape of a hotel employee by IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn.
    They also have a particularly active conservative right and dont have legalisation of Marriage or adoption rights for LGBT people.
    So while Ireland and France have their differences I would imagine the arguments around the Pride Parade are much the same.
    For a look at a French Website where they discuss these issues see here
    http://yagg.com/category/gay-pride-zoom-sur/
    If you view that website in Explorer you can use the translation button and read it in English.

    Not all of Europe has had such a good time at Pride this year.
    We may have it easy, well some of us feel we have it easy, and we may be asking whats the point, but there are others who are currently having much more of a political struggle and sometimes have to contend with Neo Nazis.

    Croatia 2011


    St Perersburg 2011
    Elena-Kostyuchenko-1.jpg

    Slavic-Pride-2011.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Ambersky wrote: »
    The French seem to have their own problems too despite the appearance of a very liberal and particular attitude to sex.
    Some, particularly French women, would believe that the tolerance for using others sexually as a kind of entertainment is in need of a bit of questioning.

    This nebulous "some" of course exists. But in my experience (I live in France) most people don't care what anybody else does in the bedroom. 'If it doesn't affect me, it's none of my business' -- it's kinda the French Way.
    This is evident in the reaction to the arrest due to allegations of attempted rape of a hotel employee by IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

    What reaction? Again, most people I know believe that DSK was set up by the UMP, or that it was consensual. Few think he actually raped a maid.
    They also have a particularly active conservative right and dont have legalisation of Marriage or adoption rights for LGBT people.

    This is true, and seemed to be the political thrust of the Pride march.
    So while Ireland and France have their differences I would imagine the arguments around the Pride Parade are much the same.

    Perhaps my post was ambiguous. In terms of the legal side of things, yes Ireland and France are comparable. It's the public's perception that's different. France benefits from having a general public attitude of minding one's own business. Ireland has a long way to go to reaching the same level of ambivalence.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement