Lawyer objects to ''curvy women'' being present in court

SparkyTech

Another example of how gender equality is an illusion in 2011. Ladies, If you have assets, don't dare cross this guy....:eek: Its a pitiful insult, tbh.

A Chicago lawyer has accused a busty woman of deliberately distracting the jury in court.

The woman, a paralegal assistant for the opposing lawyer, was sitting at the counsel's table when the objection was raised. Attorney Thomas Gooch believed his rival was using her as an unfair tactic, The AP reports.

Gooch claimed that her purpose was simply to "draw the attention of the jury away from the relevant proceedings" and requested that the woman be moved to the public gallery.

He said: "Personally, I like large breasts.''

"However, I object to somebody I don't think is a qualified paralegal sitting at the counsel table - when there's already two lawyers there - dressed in such a fashion as to call attention to herself."

Opposing attorney Dmitry Feofanov dismissed Gooch's claims, saying that the woman was entitled to sit at the table as she has previously been paid as a paralegal in two court orders.

Gooch responded: "That's not a qualification. That means Dmitry handed up a bill to a judge that said 'paralegal' on it."

The trial was for a dispute over a used car.

Hookah

What's with the stock photo in that report?

SparkyTech

Hookah wrote: »

What's with the stock photo in that report?

I know!

Hookah

SparkyTech wrote: »

I know!

Just in case we didn't know what a pair of breasts look like?

bonerm

"you shall be judged by a jury of your pervs"

Irish Guitarist

It sounds like he was complaining about her wearing revealing clothes rather than her figure.

kfallon

Heeheeheeheeheehee......his name is 'Gooch' :pac:

RachaelVO

Nice to see you keeping abreast on international issues OP.








I'm going home now...

Chuck Stone

Busted for being sexist.

Mr E

I'm racking my brain trying to think of a pun.

sensibleken

cool story bra!

Birneybau

TITS

sensibleken

The defendant claimed he had no mamary of the incident

Son Of A Vidic

What a tit!

Mickeroo

I guess she was called up for Booby Duty.


sorry

sensibleken

It was about a car. I hope the insurance had a double indemni d's clause!

sensibleken

objection she's beavering the witness. BADGER! I meant badgering the witness!

Big Nasty

Hookah wrote: »

Just in case we didn't know what a pair of breasts look like?

Dey not be tits Hookah!

These be tits!;)

Babalons

A tit in the court is worth two in the bush.

Canard

None of these puns are funny.

Dyr

Objection your honour curvy is a prejudcial term, my paralegal is clearly buxom

sensibleken

Patchy~ wrote: »

None of these puns are funny.

hahahaha...wait, i dont get it!

phill106

sensibleken wrote: »

It was about a car. I hope the insurance had a double indemni d's clause!

Did the car have dual airbags?

Taco Corp

MCMLXXV wrote: »

Dey not be tits Hookah!

These be tits!;)

What about these?

OutlawPete

Here she is and she's flat chested if anything, by no means distractingly big anyway

Source

sensibleken

phill106 wrote: »

Did the car have dual airbags?

no but there was a lot of junk in the trunk

Dyr

OutlawPete wrote: »

Here she is and she's flat chested if anything, by no means distractingly big anyway

Source

she is, however, made of wax.

christina_x

So silly... the first thing I noticed was her awful glasses!!

sensibleken

Bambi wrote: »

she is, however, made of wax.

yeah but she was made of wax before it was mainstream

Hookah

OutlawPete wrote: »

Here she is and she's flat chested if anything, by no means distractingly big anyway

That's hardly the point.

The mere hint of tits can be distracting.

Chuck Stone

Patchy~ wrote: »

None of these puns are fanny.

Ha ha, I see what you did there!

Big Nasty

Surley wrote: »

What about these?

Surely not!:eek::eek::eek:

efb

I sure this story will have plenty of knockers...

opinion guy

OutlawPete wrote: »

Here she is and she's flat chested if anything, by no means distractingly big anyway

Source

Well she's obviously dressed for this photo to cover up her chest but the clown glasses are actually pretty distracting in their own right

Absurdum

Surley wrote: »

What about these?

my perfect woman

Saila

big tits =/= curvy

Taco Corp

MCMLXXV wrote: »

Surely not!:eek::eek::eek:

Don't call me surely!!:)

wonderfulname

Surley wrote: »

What about these?

What about these?

tan11ie

Those glasses are so distracting!!!! like the ones out of the Euro shop!

Taco Corp

wonderfulname wrote: »

What about these?

Fine pair of tits !

whatdoicare

OutlawPete wrote: »

Here she is and she's flat chested if anything, by no means distractingly big anyway

Source

What's with the nerd glasses?? If anything they are distracting!

Bottle_of_Smoke

SparkyTech wrote: »

Another example of how gender equality is an illusion in 2011.

One guy makes a horrible bullying comment towards one womean and all of a sudden gender equality is an illusion.

Its this kind of nonsense gives decent feminists a bad name.

Super-Rush

He's dead right to object. Its fcuking digraceful the way some women flaunt their goods these days.

I could be out walking the dog one evening and i'll see what i know to be a glorious pair of funbags bouncing violently in the distance as some yummy mummy power walks towards me. I try to fight it, but my eyes have decided not to listen to my brain anymore, and as we get closer and closer i become transfixed by the hypnotic rhythm of those puppies jiggling and bouncing.........Then BAM........ Without warning my bollox almost explodes because i've walked into one of those stupid fcuking steel bollards that are exactly at testicle height.

Standman

Fúcking hell! All the time, money and energy mafia bosses must have wasted on bribing and intimidating witnesses when all they needed was a large pair of chats on display in the courtroom.

PeakOutput

SparkyTech wrote: »

Another example of how gender equality is an illusion in 2011.

Dosn't really have anything to do with gender equality at all now does it? Be honest.

One lawyer has an opinion, another lawyer has a different opinion. they are making arguments to reinforce their opinion and the judge decides who is correct.

It dosn't really reflect on any situation outside of that particular courtroom at that particular time.

Fukuyama

Funny puns aside...

Your assertion that gender differences havn't been settled based on this shoddy article is laughable.

It wasn't me!

super-rush wrote: »

He's dead right to object. Its fcuking digraceful the way some women flaunt their goods these days.

I could be out walking the dog one evening and i'll see what i know to be a glorious pair of funbags bouncing violently in the distance as some yummy mummy power walks towards me. I try to fight it, but my eyes have decided not to listen to my brain anymore, and as we get closer and closer i become transfixed by the hypnotic rhythm of those puppies jiggling and bouncing.........Then BAM........ Without warning my bollox almost explodes because i've walked into one of those stupid fcuking steel bollards that are exactly at testicle height.

And typically with a big profiled top on them to act as a hammer. Perfect.

maglite

If anything he is promoting gender quality, raising an objection to her being there as a pair of tits.

The main point wrote:

dressed in such a fashion as to call attention to herself.

SparkyTech

Dean0088 wrote: »

Funny puns aside...

Your assertion that gender differences havn't been settled based on this shoddy article is laughable.

On that note we will have to agree to disagree. If gender differences had been settled at large in 2011 a case like this would never have been reported on in the first place. I think it's shocking a lawyer, of all people, would make such a remark in a court of law.

Johro

A friend of mine was breastfeeding her baby, she was seated in a hospital corridor, and a nurse came over and asked her to move as she was apparently 'upsetting some of the male patients'.
Aww... Poor guys.
Must be a truly awful experience.

Bottle_of_Smoke

Johro wrote: »

A friend of mine was breastfeeding her baby, she was seated in a hospital corridor, and a nurse came over and asked her to move as she was apparently 'upsetting some of the male patients'.
Aww... Poor guys.
Must be a truly awful experience.

I genuinely think there should be a law against that.

The baby is gonna be more upset about being hungry than some pathetic excuses for men who find nature upsetting.