No teachers like this in my school :-(

ringadingding

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1389292/Disgrace-drinking-pole-dancing-primary-school-teachers-published-pictures-Facebook.html



Forget about whether they should or shouldn't have put photos up, can you imagine the amount of tugging that goes in after school.

I mean, I only had Mrs. Pill, who was old and minging, but it did not deter me cracking one off thinking of her most nights.

I always used to get jealous in schools whenever there was ' scandalous' stories in the papers of some teacher having sex with her 13 year old pupil, I always wanted to be that guy.

Closest I ever got, was a dinner lady bending over once, and i convinced myself a saw the edge of a nipple, fappity fap time.

Chris P. Bacon

Im glad they dont,they are rotten.

Wolfe Tone

Talk about an OTT reaction, teachers are entitled to private lives, I was expecting to read about how they rode some student, not about how photos from a hen party ended up on facebook

byte

Daily Mail... unsurprisingly.

Vain

The parent who printed them off is a sad busy body. They can do what the want outside of school ffs:mad::mad:

Super-Rush

Tbh the only thing i'd be tugging would be my eyeballs out of their sockets. One of them looks like she ate some of her class.

richymcdermott

Dam didnt i go to the wrong school:pac:

ringadingding

AAAaahhhhh, but cast your mind back to a 14 year old and judge them then

DoesNotCompute

It's a hen party, ffs, it's to be expected. Anyway those pics on the daily mail webpage are not too provocative. Still not the brightest idea to post them on Facebook I suppose.

bonerm

So where's the story about the latest lucky schoolboy who's getting molested by his hot teacher? That's what I expected to read about here.

Not nice nice nice. :mad:

cesc77

Shouldnt be on facebook,but they havent really done anything wrong.

If there was a stripper involved and whipped cream....then maybe:pac:

abouttobebanned

There should be a "Won't someone think of the children" Forum and this is the only place that Daily Mail links are allowed.

RMD

No matter what your profession is, your entitled to a normal private life outside of the workplace. That said though, having your facebook on public especially when in a position of teacher is very stupid, there's always some gobshíte out there who will make a problem out of nothing.

Mint Sauce

Another slow news day at the dailyfail offices then.

What a none news story, these parents really must not get out too often if they're complaining about this.

J. Marston

Can't scratch your arse these days without someone getting offended. Fùckin' Daily Mail...

Chris P. Bacon

abouttobebanned wrote: »

There should be a "Won't someone think of the children" Forum and this is the only place that Daily Mail links are allowed.

You dont like newspapers much do you

Any key?

Oh God. I'm a primary school teacher. My Facebook is PRIVATE.
Still my photos are worse than that but still they must have been public.

superelliptic

Daily Mail should just change their name to "Moral Outrage Gestapo Gazzett".

Chris P. Bacon

Any key? wrote: »

Oh God. I'm a primary school teacher. My Facebook is PRIVATE.
Still my photos are worse than that but still they must have been public.

Hi,would you like to be friends?

Yahew

The real reason to fire the teachers is publishing the pictures. Indication of stoopid.

Crann na Beatha

This post has been deleted.

abouttobebanned

Chris P. Bacon wrote: »

You dont like newspapers much do you

Now that you mention it..no I don't.

Chris P. Bacon

abouttobebanned wrote: »

Now that you mention it..no I don't.

I kinda guessed that.

partyndbs

Prob ugliest collection of people I've ever seen in my life

brummytom

Good old Daily Mail, protecting common decency.

Thank God they didn't reproduce the photos for the whole of the reactionary right-wing public to see.

Any key?

Chris P. Bacon wrote: »

Hi,would you like to be friends?

NO
see I'm internet savY:)
Ah but u have to feel sorry for the girls if they were on a hen.

RichieC

Outrage as in one awful nosey bitch and the daily mail.

Oranage2

If anyone wants to see 'teachers gone wild', just go coppers saturday night -

Naikon

Serves them right. Don't put hen photos online for everybody to see if you work in a job where garda vetting is required. People will be outraged over nothing these days, especially when it comes to little darling. Very tame pictures mind you.

OutlawPete

Forget them lot, anyone notice the papped pics of Athena Turner in the right hand column? I soo would, one of my favourite milfs for sure.

dagdha

Damn it! Where were all these sexed up teachers when I was in school?

Chris P. Bacon

OutlawPete wrote: »

Forget them lot, anyone notice the papped pics of Athena Turner in the right hand column? I soo would, one of my favourite milfs for sure.

She is your favorite milf?,c'mon Pete you must have seen Kelly Madison

roast

I'd do 'em.

cesc77

OutlawPete wrote: »

Forget them lot, anyone notice the papped pics of Athena Turner in the right hand column? I soo would, one of my favourite milfs for sure.

Id prefer her more with my melting flake in her hand....

WoollyRedHat

If I was the principle, this is how my letter to the concerned parent would go:

Dear concerned parent (always concerned, never actually proactive, just concerned about somebody else's ****ups rather than their own failings)


Thank you for taking the time to raise such petty matters, it is good to see you are doing something with your time and upholding your find stance in your community, you gossipy, always have an ear for the latest scandal, biatch
.Ahem, anyway Ms. Concern, as always, we try to reply to your questions in a fair and balanced fashion, one of which is rationale, as you can never get enough rationalism today, as you may know!!

In answer to your first question, you pose the old age question of how safe are our children. This is a very valid and a rational question indeed, Ms. Concerned Parent. I can ,safely say, you see what I did there, that your children are as safe as they always have been, depending on their parents. What your children are subjected to, or do outside school hours, are the responsibility of their parent, who, as a parent, involves monitoring what they get up to on their own.

As with anything on the internet, without parent supervision, your child could be subjected to anything. Ask them next time have they seen blue waffle, there is a chance they have, and if so it is regrettable. However, as a concerned parent, you must take responsibility for this, as to what your child sees on the internet. In short, we cannot control every single thing on the internet. It is regrettable that they saw these images, but rest assured it is not the end of the world, and life will continue for your little ones, we give you our assurance on that.

In answer to that second question, I'd have to say absolutely **** all Ms. Concerned, would you care to give your opinions on that matter?

And finally, in response to your final statemnt, remove the scum?
I mean, really, Ms. Concerned, you have gone from a caring, upset parent, which I understand, to a hysterical lunatic!! These are people, Ms. Concerned, they are not witches, they do not preach the satanic verse to the children during classes. They may enjoy a tipple Ms. Concerned, they work hard, they educate your little darlings 5 days a week, if they are bad teachers then it is another matter entirely. Is it really such a bad thing that they enjoy themselves once in a while outside school hours. Do you not enjoy a tipple Ms. Concerned? Would you really like us to throw them out and get Mr. Pickard. I tell you, Ms. Concerned, Mr. Pickard will not be happy, not one bit, if we coax him out of retirement, for such mindless bull****, to satisfy your petty obsessions, with all due respect!

Finally, to conclude my letter to you, which I will hope will address your " I'm an offended parent, join me on my crusade, burn the Witches of Langland", I would like to point out the irony in your publishing the matter to everyone who ever had an internet connection as not only can your children see the original images on the website, but also every other child who had not heard of such a small incident, now knows full well about it. So, I must say, Ms. Concerned Parent. on what a fabulous job you have done on promoting our staff's raucous behavior, all by yourself, in which any child can now easily find, if they so wish, more easily than ever.

I hope I have addressed all the matters which you posted and thank you for your inquiry, we hope to hear from you soon

Yours Sincerely
The Principle

starbelgrade

WoollyRedHat wrote: »

If I was the principle, this is how my letter to the concerned parent would go:

And the reply would be;

Dear Principal,

tl;dr.

Laterz

C.P.

Yahew

it's principal, not principle.

Console

Another example of how people can be as*holes.
The teachers, as said before in the thread, are entitled to their own private lives.

cesc77

WoollyRedHat wrote: »

If I was the principle, this is how my letter to the concerned parent would go:

Dear concerned parent (always concerned, never actually proactive, just concerned about somebody elses ****ups rather than their own failings\0


Thank you for taking the time to raise such petty matters, it is good to see you are doing something with your time and upholding your find stance in your community, you gossipy, always have an ear for the latest scandal, biatch. Ahem, anyway Ms. Concern, as always, we try to reply to your questions in a fair and balanced fashion, one of which is rationale, as you can never get enough rationalism today, as you may know!!

In answer to your first question, you pose the old age question of how safe are our children. This is a very valid and rational question indeed, Ms. Concerned Parent. I can ,safely say, you see what I did there, that your children are as safe as they always have been, depending on their parents. What your children are subjected to, or do outside school hours, are the responsibility of their parent, who, as a parent, involves monitoring what they get up to on their own.

As with anything on the internet, without parent supervision, your child could be subjected to anything. Ask them next time have they seen blue waffle, there is a chance they have, and if so it is regrettable. However, as a concerned parent, you must take responsibility for this, as to what your child sees on the internet. In short, we cannot control every single thing on the internet. It is regrettable that they saw these images, but rest assured it is not the end of the world, and life will continue, we give you our assurance on that.

In answer to that second question, I'd have to say absolutely **** all Ms. Concerned, would you care to give your opinions on that matter?

And finally, in response to your final statemnt Remove the scum?
Really, Ms. Concerned, you have gone from a caring, upset parent, which I understand, to a hysterical lunatic. These are people, Ms. Concerned, they are not witches, they do not preach the satanic verse to the children during classes, as far as I know. They enjoy a tipple Ms. Concerned, they work hard, they educate your little darlings 5 days a week, is it really such a bad thing that they enjoy themselves once in a while. Do you not enjoy a tipple Ms. Concerened? Would you really like us to throw them out and get Mr. Pickard. I tell you Ms. Concerned, Mr. Pickard will not be happy, not one bit, if we coax him out of retirement, for such mindless bull****, to satisfy your petty obsessions.

Finally, to conclude my letter to you, which I will hope will address your I'm an offended parent, join me on my crusade, campaign, I would like to point out the irony in your publishing the matter to everyone who ever had an internet connection, not only can your children see the original images on the website, but also every other child who had not heard of a small incident, now knows full well about it. So, I must say, Ms. Concerned Parent. on what a fabulous job you have done on promoting our staff's raucous behavior, in which any child can now easily find, if they so wish, more easily than ever.

I hope I have addressed all the matters which you posted, thank you for your inquiry

Kind Regards,
The Principle

Where you the fat one?Spidy senses hostility..

sdanseo

WoollyRedHat wrote: »

If I was the principle, this is how my letter to the concerned parent would go:

Dear concerned parent (always concerned, never actually proactive, just concerned about somebody elses ****ups rather than their own failings\0


Thank you for taking the time to raise such petty matters, it is good to see you are doing something with your time and upholding your find stance in your community, you gossipy, always have an ear for the latest scandal, biatch. Ahem, anyway Ms. Concern, as always, we try to reply to your questions in a fair and balanced fashion, one of which is rationale, as you can never get enough rationalism today, as you may know!!

In answer to your first question, you pose the old age question of how safe are our children. This is a very valid and rational question indeed, Ms. Concerned Parent. I can ,safely say, you see what I did there, that your children are as safe as they always have been, depending on their parents. What your children are subjected to, or do outside school hours, are the responsibility of their parent, who, as a parent, involves monitoring what they get up to on their own.

As with anything on the internet, without parent supervision, your child could be subjected to anything. Ask them next time have they seen blue waffle, there is a chance they have, and if so it is regrettable. However, as a concerned parent, you must take responsibility for this, as to what your child sees on the internet. In short, we cannot control every single thing on the internet. It is regrettable that they saw these images, but rest assured it is not the end of the world, and life will continue, we give you our assurance on that.

In answer to that second question, I'd have to say absolutely **** all Ms. Concerned, would you care to give your opinions on that matter?

And finally, in response to your final statemnt Remove the scum?
Really, Ms. Concerned, you have gone from a caring, upset parent, which I understand, to a hysterical lunatic. These are people, Ms. Concerned, they are not witches, they do not preach the satanic verse to the children during classes, as far as I know. They enjoy a tipple Ms. Concerned, they work hard, they educate your little darlings 5 days a week, is it really such a bad thing that they enjoy themselves once in a while. Do you not enjoy a tipple Ms. Concerened? Would you really like us to throw them out and get Mr. Pickard. I tell you Ms. Concerned, Mr. Pickard will not be happy, not one bit, if we coax him out of retirement, for such mindless bull****, to satisfy your petty obsessions.

Finally, to conclude my letter to you, which I will hope will address your I'm an offended parent, join me on my crusade, campaign, I would like to point out the irony in your publishing the matter to everyone who ever had an internet connection, not only can your children see the original images on the website, but also every other child who had not heard of a small incident, now knows full well about it. So, I must say, Ms. Concerned Parent. on what a fabulous job you have done on promoting our staff's raucous behavior, in which any child can now easily find, if they so wish, more easily than ever.

I hope I have addressed all the matters which you posted, thank you for your inquiry

Kind Regards,
The Principle

I'd do a shorter version.

Dear Parent

Thank you for your concern. Please note that nothing aa teacher at this school does in his or her private time is or should be of any concern to either the school or to you, once no laws have been broken.

If you feel there has been a crime, please phone the police. Otherwise, I remind you that the school will not interfere in the private activities of our staff.

It should be further noted that anything posted on social networking websites by teachers is done with the knowledge that such material may be accessed by students, but also in the knowledge that access to the internet of by any student other than while on school grounds in the responsibility of you the parent.

Kind Regards

OutlawPete

Chris P. Bacon wrote: »

She is your favorite milf?,c'mon Pete you must have seen Kelly Madison

I said: "One of" .. I'm not crazy

cesc77 wrote: »

Id prefer her more with my melting flake in her hand....

Lot of women getting free flakes in AH tonight.

WoollyRedHat

starbelgrade wrote: »

And the reply would be;

Dear Principal,

tl;dr.

Laterz

C.P.

Dear C.P

Yeah whatever you say bitch,

peace out

PP

cesc77 wrote: »

Where you the fat one?Spidy senses hostility..

No, I was just bored, but what would fatness have to do with it

starbelgrade

Yahew wrote: »

it's principal, not principle.

Who cares? It's the principal that counts.

bazkennedy

complete over reaction. Obviously the parent doesn't understand the concepts of a private life and fun

Console

bazkennedy wrote: »

complete over reaction. Obviously the parent doesn't understand the concepts of a private life and fun

Exactly.
And personally, I think this parent is apart of the moral police. Willing to jump in at any given opportunity.

shannon_tek

Have to put it in

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI

Has to be true its in the Daily mail

cesc77

WoollyRedHat wrote: »

Dear C.P

Yeah whatever you say bitch,

peace out

PP




No, I was just bored, but what would fatness have to do with it

Sorry,Wooly.It wasnt meant as a personal insult.I was making a smart arsed effort referring to an earlier comment about one of the larger teachers in the photos.I actually appreciate what you had took the time to write there and am sorry for my disparaging short comment which now appears very childish.

You are not fat,Wooly and I am not an arse.

That was quite a piece you wrote there,most of which I agreed with,so dont be deterred by the detractors.


See,Im a nice lad.Not like some others who weigh heavily on the sarcasm......I mean every word

deco nate

irish-stew wrote: »

Another slow news day at the dailyfail offices then.

What a none news story, these parents really must not get out too often if they're complaining about this.

plus...why are they googling thier kids teachers?
maybe to wack one off on the sly.

an the other half walked in on em...em
do you see wot "our" kids are bein put thru in the hands o these scum!..(gets rid
o tissue):D

Paully D

Next from the Daily Mail: "Teaching causes cancer"

strobe

I also scoff disparagingly at the Daily Mail.

(I'm helping )

WoollyRedHat

cesc77 wrote: »

Sorry,Wooly.It wasnt meant as a personal insult.I was making a smart arsed effort referring to an earlier comment about one of the larger teachers in the photos.I actually appreciate what you had took the time to write there and am sorry for my disparaging short comment which now appears very childish.

You are not fat,Wooly and I am not an arse.

That was quite a piece you wrote there,most of which I agreed with,so dont be deterred by the detractors.


See,Im a nice lad.Not like some others who weigh heavily on the sarcasm......I mean every word

Dear Cesc,

I could chose to be offended by your mispelling of my name, but i'll let that slide.

Thank you for the sincerity of your post and indeed the time you have taken to reply to my post on such short notice.But yes, I am indeed a fat lard.









Yours Sincerely