Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What questions can a witness be asked

  • 12-05-2011 5:12pm
    #1
    Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭


    Greetings all.

    If one is called as a witness for the DPP in a case of dangerous driving what sort of questions are to be expected?

    Can the defence ask any questions that are intended as an ad hominem attack on the witness' credibility?

    E.g. questions relating to career/contact with Gardaí etc.

    Or do the questions asked have to relate specifically to the case?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭Reloc8


    It depends.

    The judge decides.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    As Reloc8 says Judge rules.

    However in a RTA attacking a witness's credibility for the grounds stated would be a brave decision.

    More likely to be asked re distances from incident, view of it, recollection, contents of statement made shortly afterwards.

    District Courts are busy places and District Judges do not have much time for the Perry Mason/Johnny COchrane approach/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,345 ✭✭✭NUTLEY BOY


    Going after a witnesses's credibility is a decidedly risky aproach if you do not already have a good idea of what you are going to extract.

    The primary purpose of a good cross examination is to damage the credibility of the evidence of a witness as given under direct examination.

    There is the second division class of cross examination that seeks to damage the credibility of the witness personally. The purpose of this approach is to damage the witness personally and thus, by inference, the credibility of their evidence. It is a risky strategy if you are not fairly sure of where you are going.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    I suppose it comes back to the ancient axiom not to ask a question unless you already know the answer.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭Reloc8


    Or unless by previous questions you've already excluded all answers/options which are damaging to your case (being a nuance on much the same principle as nuac has mentioned)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement