Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Historical parallels and all that

  • 09-05-2011 8:02pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,490 ✭✭✭


    "Germany’s economy was in a mess when Hitler was elected Chancellor in January 1933. Hitler and Nazi propaganda had played on the population’s fear of no hope. Unemployment peaked at 6 million during the final days of the Weimar Republic – near enough 50% of the nation’s working population. Now Hitler decreed that all should work in Nazi Germany and he constantly played on the economic miracle Nazi Germany achieved."


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 431 ✭✭aido179


    you realised this thread just ended cuz you mentioned hitler right?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,918 ✭✭✭✭orourkeda


    sieg heil


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 534 ✭✭✭Donal Og O Baelach


    Almaviva wrote: »
    "Germany’s economy was in a mess when Hitler was elected Chancellor in January 1933. Hitler and Nazi propaganda had played on the population’s fear of no hope. Unemployment peaked at 6 million during the final days of the Weimar Republic – near enough 50% of the nation’s working population. Now Hitler decreed that all should work in Nazi Germany and he constantly played on the economic miracle Nazi Germany achieved."

    ANOTHER thread about Mick Wallace?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,030 ✭✭✭✭Chuck Stone


    Oh you smart.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,547 ✭✭✭Agricola


    Enda lacks the charisma of a Hitler, or a toothbrush for that matter.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 192 ✭✭paddy0090


    More Elmer Fudd than Hitler. Though personally I'll always think of him as that 'n****r guy'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,751 ✭✭✭Saila


    and.. :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,739 ✭✭✭✭starbelgrade


    I rate this thread a 1 out of ten.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭Duckworth_Luas


    At least the trains will run on time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,647 ✭✭✭✭El Weirdo


    I rate this thread a 1 out of ten.
    Generous.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,647 ✭✭✭✭El Weirdo


    At least the trains will run on time.
    That was Mussolini.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,784 ✭✭✭Superbus


    Yeah - Enda's definitely representative of a rise in extremist politics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    At least the trains will run on time.

    That was Mussolini who got their trains to run on time.
    Quite an achievement for Italy

    Gah: beaten to it ^^


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,734 ✭✭✭Duckworth_Luas


    El Weirdo wrote: »
    That was Mussolini.

    So what did Hitler do again?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,515 ✭✭✭✭admiralofthefleet


    aido179 wrote: »
    you realised this thread just ended cuz you mentioned hitler right?

    hitler was a genius that was way ahead of his time

    /runs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,647 ✭✭✭✭El Weirdo


    That was Mussolini who got their trains to run on time.
    Quite an achievement for Italy

    Gah: beaten to it ^^
    Although the capacity of trains in Hitler's Germany was increased somewhat.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Almaviva wrote: »
    "Germany’s economy was in a mess when Hitler was elected Chancellor in January 1933. Hitler and Nazi propaganda had played on the population’s fear of no hope. Unemployment peaked at 6 million during the final days of the Weimar Republic – near enough 50% of the nation’s working population. Now Hitler decreed that all should work in Nazi Germany and he constantly played on the economic miracle Nazi Germany achieved."
    Almost all job creation was in the preparation for war, are we planning to go to war!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,986 ✭✭✭✭mikemac


    So what did Hitler do again?

    Network of autobahns

    Google tells me the correct term is Autobahnen for plural


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭Sandwlch


    The Germans couldn't repay the French after WW I. Hitler decided to sort it out.
    We cant repay the Germans after Bailout 1. Enda has said he's going to sort it out.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭PeterIanStaker


    This thread is so bad it could be the lead article in the Sindo.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭ArtyM


    The cornerstones of Nazi Germany.....
    Organisation,
    Efficiency,
    National Pride,
    the idea of Genetic Superiority,
    Single minded pursuit of goals,
    aspire to greatness.

    There is not a chance in 200 Hells that any of those concepts could find a home in this country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 243 ✭✭chunkylover4


    used extensive labour programmes like the autobahns to create employment


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 534 ✭✭✭Donal Og O Baelach


    ArtyM wrote: »
    The cornerstones of Nazi Germany.....
    Organisation,
    Efficiency,
    National Pride,
    the idea of Genetic Superiority,
    Single minded pursuit of goals,
    aspire to greatness.

    There is not a chance in 200 Hells that any of those concepts could find a home in this country.

    Drink,
    Arse,
    Feck.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,262 ✭✭✭✭GavRedKing


    So what did Hitler do again?

    He tried to get rid of all the juice.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    used extensive labour programmes like the autobahns to create employment



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    These parallels do seem to spring up every so waffen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,194 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    Almaviva wrote: »
    "Germany’s economy was in a mess when Hitler was elected Chancellor in January 1933. Hitler and Nazi propaganda had played on the population’s fear of no hope. Unemployment peaked at 6 million during the final days of the Weimar Republic – near enough 50% of the nation’s working population. Now Hitler decreed that all should work in Nazi Germany and he constantly played on the economic miracle Nazi Germany achieved."
    Economic miracle? Nazi Germany? Half of the unemployed were put into the army and the other half made weapons for the army! The result - the destruction of Germany and over 50m dead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,163 ✭✭✭✭danniemcq


    That was Mussolini who got their trains to run on time.
    Quite an achievement for Italy

    Gah: beaten to it ^^
    El Weirdo wrote: »
    That was Mussolini.

    alas both wrong though!

    from here http://www.snopes.com/history/govern/trains.asp
    Claim: Italian dictator Benito Mussolini made the trains run on time.

    Status: False.

    Origins: Every political leader — whether he be a democratically elected representative or a usurping tyrant — seeks to gain broad public support, because the greater his support, the greater his power. That power may ultimately be used for good or for bad, but either way it must be obtained before it can be wielded.

    One Benito Mussolini of the best ways to gain the support of the people you want to lead is to do something of benefit to them. Failing that, the next best thing is to convince them that you have done something of benefit to them, even though you really haven't. So it was with Benito Mussolini and the Italian railway system.

    After the "march on Rome" (which was itself a myth of fascist propaganda) on 28 October 1922 that resulted in King Vittorio Emanuele's appointment of Benito Mussolini as prime minister and the accession to power of the fascists in Italy, Mussolini needed to convince the people of Italy that fascism was indeed a system that worked to their benefit. Thus was born the myth of fascist efficiency, with the train as its symbol. The word was spread that Mussolini had turned the dilapidated Italian railway system into one that was the envy of all Europe, featuring trains that were both dependable and punctual. In Mussolini's Italy, all the trains ran on time.

    Well, not quite. The Italian railway system had fallen into a rather sad state during World War I, and it did improve a good deal during the 1920s, but Mussolini was disingenuous in taking credit for the changes: much of the repair work had been performed before Mussolini and the fascists came to power in 1922. More importantly (to the claim at hand), those who actually lived in Italy during the Mussolini era have borne testimony that the Italian railway's legendary adherence to timetables was far more myth than reality.


    The myth of Mussolini's punctual trains lives on, albeit with a different slant: rather than serving as a fictitious symbol of the benefits of fascism, it is now offered as a sardonic example that something good can result even from the worst of circumstances. As Montagu and Darling wrote:
    Mussolini may have done many brutal and tyrannical things; he may have destroyed human freedom in Italy; he may have murdered and tortured citizens whose only crime was to oppose Mussolini; but 'one had to admit' one thing about the Dictator: he 'made the trains run on time.'
    No, thanks. I'd rather walk.

    Sightings: In an episode of televisions L.A. Law ("Romancing the Drone," originally aired 17 November 1988), Michael Kuzak answers Grace Van Owen's criticism with "And Mussolini made the trains run on time."

    Last updated: 29 September 2007


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭Krusader


    Agricola wrote: »
    Enda lacks the charisma of a Hitler, or a toothbrush for that matter.

    Really?? :pac:

    221763_186072884778382_116110171774654_540615_5580516_s.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,375 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    when the irish government start showing signs of most of the 14 points of fascism then maybe you can claim we have another hitler on our hands, george w bush for example could easily have been said to have displayed at least 11 of the 14 signs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,163 ✭✭✭✭danniemcq


    Economic miracle? Nazi Germany? Half of the unemployed were put into the army and the other half made weapons for the army! The result - the destruction of Germany and over 50m dead.


    sigh if only he sent the unemployed off to the Eastern front then the unemployment rate would have been slashed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,225 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    I think he borrowed billions from other countries so that he could pimp up the German war-machine, and knowing full well that Germany couldn't pay the money back, decided to invade as many creditor countries that he could, so that Germany wouldn't have to hand back the cash.

    It looked good on paper, but he made a couple of errors.


  • Posts: 31,118 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    danniemcq wrote: »
    alas both wrong though!

    from here http://www.snopes.com/history/govern/trains.asp
    And Mussolini made the trains run on time."

    Reminds me of a more recent British Rail classic.

    The 6:45 from brighton was frequently 5 minutes late arriving in London, so they just added 5 ninutes on to the official journey time. It was rarely late after that ! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,650 ✭✭✭sensibleken


    worst historical analogy ever!

    or should i say vurste....aye..aye?

    :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,215 ✭✭✭galah


    cause the economy was booming and the country/economy striving when Hitler was finished with his "reign", right? :rolleyes:

    seriously now, Ted...


  • Advertisement
Advertisement