Chelsea V West Ham ESPN 5.30pm

Johner

Ivanovic in at RB is the only change from the game against Birmingham, Torres on the bench.

superfrank

Torres on the Bench again. No Surprise, ya couldn't drop Drogs with the form he is in.

Headshot

Is Parker fit to play ?

superfrank

Headshot wrote: »

Is Parker fit to play ?

Yep, hes starting!

MagicMarker

8-0

Headshot

West Ham may have a small hope then

superfrank

Apologies Parker not in the Squad!

Johner

Parker is out injured.

flahavaj

Bloodbath at the Bridge. Won't even bother watching.

Cricket score. Made for Torres.

Raskolnikov

Chelsea

* 01 Cech
* 02 Ivanovic
* 03 A Cole
* 04 David Luiz
* 26 Terry
* 05 Essien
* 08 Lampard
* 12 Mikel
* 15 Malouda
* 11 Drogba
* 21 Kalou

Substitutes

* 22 Turnbull,
* 19 Ferreira,
* 34 Bertrand,
* 10 Benayoun,
* 18 Zhirkov,
* 09 Torres,
* 39 Anelka

Raskolnikov

West Ham

* 01 Green
* 04 Gabbidon
* 18 Spector
* 22 Da Costa
* 36 Bridge
* 37 Jacobsen
* 11 Hitzlsperger
* 16 Noble
* 09 Cole
* 19 Sears
* 21 Ba

Substitutes

* 31 Boffin,
* 05 Tomkins,
* 13 Boa Morte,
* 14 Kovac,
* 30 Piquionne,
* 33 Obinna,
* 34 Keane

Surprised that Keane has been benched - he has looked lively for West Ham so far.

Raskolnikov

superfrank wrote: »

Yep, hes starting!

BBC says no.

ShamoBuc

Without Parker I would imagine a comfrotable 3 or 4 nil win for chelsea.

superfrank

any stream for the pre match?

Le King

Chelsea 12-0. Easy win. Torres for two hat-tricks.

Essien

Should be a straight forward 2 or 3 goal victory for us here.

Johner

Should hammer these.

Essien

Le King wrote: »

Chelsea 12-0. Easy win. Torres for two hat-tricks.

One of these is bound to come true sooner or later, I hope its this one.

superfrank

Any Stream? Having trouble finding one?

The Muppet

This evening I shall be supporting the Hammers of London Town for all the good it'll do.

Gonzovision

superfrank wrote: »

Any Stream? Having trouble finding one?

liveonlinefooty

Johner

http://vipbox.tv/watch/29211/1/chelsea-vs-west-ham-united.html

Essien

gonzovision wrote: »

liveonlinefooty

Great quality streams there, €7 well spent imo

Johner

Poor finish Malouda

Raskolnikov

Who is this Hitzlburger I keep hearing about?

Nalz

Did Bridge build a bridge at the bridge?

(was there a handshake)

murpho999

Trilla wrote: »

Did Bridge build a bridge at the bridge?

(was there a handshake)

No: they just blanked each other!

Johner

Good break there by West ham

Raskolnikov

West Ham coming into this one now.

Hank Scorpio

How did west ham not score there!

murpho999

MagicMarker wrote: »

8-0

flahavaj wrote: »

Bloodbath at the Bridge. Won't even bother watching.

Cricket score. Made for Torres.

ShamoBuc wrote: »

Without Parker I would imagine a comfrotable 3 or 4 nil win for chelsea.

Le King wrote: »

Chelsea 12-0. Easy win. Torres for two hat-tricks.

Essien wrote: »

Should be a straight forward 2 or 3 goal victory for us here.

Johner wrote: »

Should hammer these.

So ye were saying lads?

Raskolnikov

Ivanovic getting into good positions but his right boot is muck.

Nalz

Thats 4 serious chances for West Ham now

How are they not 1 up?

Gonzovision

Luiz out cold

Hank Scorpio

luiz knocked out by cech , luckily hes fine now

TheTownie

Trilla wrote: »

Thats 4 serious chances for West Ham now

How are they not 1 up?

Divine intervention me thinks...

Johner

Get the **** in!!!

Nalz

Should be 2 or 3 now

Honestly its been against the run of play though

Johner

Trilla wrote: »

Should be 2 or 3 now

Honestly its been against the run of play though

And it should have been 1-0 after 2 minutes through Malouda but it wasn't.

Fair play to West Ham they look good on the counter though......

Cypher_sounds

Chelsea are lucky to be winning this at half time.

Essien

Cypher_sounds wrote: »

Chelsea are lucky to be winning this at half time.

West Ham could have scored but we're not "lucky" to be ahead, we could have been 1 or 2 up in the first few mins.

Nalz

Johner wrote: »

And it should have been 1-0 after 2 minutes through Malouda but it wasn't.

Ifs and buts Johner lets be fair. 4 clear cut chances from West Ham in 45 mins at Stamford Bridge. I fancy Drogba to turn the screw and put it to bed 2nd half. Mikel not up to much

Nalz

Essien wrote: »

West Ham could have scored but we're not "lucky" to be ahead, we could have been 1 or 2 up in the first few mins.

I think a team that has double the clear cut chances another team has and fails to take any of them can be deemed stroke(s) of luck. Heck even if they've equal amount of chances it depends on the chances, general play and situations.

Het-Field

A just half-time score would be 0-0.

Both sides have had three clear cut chances. Chelsea have had more of the play, the Hammers look dangerous on the counter.

Johner

Trilla wrote: »

Ifs and buts Johner lets be fair. 4 clear cut chances from West Ham in 45 mins at Stamford Bridge. I fancy Drogba to turn the screw and put it to bed 2nd half. Mikel not up to much

4 clear cut chances? A strike from 30 yards from Ba although it was a good one is hardly clear cut.

Spector's header was a hard chance and he did as well as he could with it, Sears's was also a tough chance as he has to improvise.

West Ham have looked dangerous on the counter and had a good spell midway through the second half but our goal was hardly against the run of play.

Johner

Ah kalou

Johner

Not Essien's knee again

Paul Tergat

Carlton Cole is suck a ****ing donkey

Essien

We're gonna regret all these missed chances.

Johner

Essien wrote: »

We're gonna regret all these missed chances.

Was just about to say the same!

Paul Tergat

So are West Ham. Ridiculous