Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

pKa and Delta E

  • 20-03-2011 11:41pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4


    Hey everyone,

    Im doin a drug design module and we used gaussian 03w to find the delta E of nevirapine and a protonated version of nevirapine. We were then asked to use this to calculate the pKa.... but i'm not sure how.

    I've tried using the delta G of the system but it doesn't match any literature values! help please!

    Dr.Bee


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,155 ✭✭✭SOL


    Delta G = RTLnK so if you know what temperature your model is supposed to be at then you should be able to calculate K right?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4 DRdotBEE


    Yea using delta G = -RTlnK but using that K value for the pKa gives an answer = -0.04.....

    whereas lit. says it is about 2.8, I don't know if this is a fault in the gaussian calculations or what. thanks for the post though :)


  • Posts: 3,505 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well this is just a guess, I could be really really wrong.

    The delta E was taken from the sum of electronic and thermal energies?
    You can use the energies to calculate the enthalpy of the change from one to the other. Then put enthalpy, temperature etc into

    adb9e54e0a61572662793883c93f5db0.png

    I think, and then take the minus log of K to get pKa?

    Gaussian measures in Hartrees if I remember right, so you'll probably have to convert to kJ/mol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4 DRdotBEE


    Thanks for that,

    I'm pretty sure our lecturer has somehow led us astray. The figures from gaussian even after conversion to KJ/mol (you were very correct) don't match any literature values (all lying at 2.8 ish)

    All the theory you've posted makes sense though.

    I asked the lecturer today and he just said work the relative basicity out from the delta G value of the protonation reaction (the more negative the more basic)

    I think its his attempt to cover up his numerical errors.

    Thanks for all the help though! :D


Advertisement