Why does the I.C.C. only target African countries?

0verblood · 30-01-2011 9:17pm #1

What is it with the Internationa Criminal Court only targeting Africans?

I'm sure there are many other war criminals to go after in other continents, like fcukin Bin Laden for example??? Or whatever happened in Bosnia and Yugoslavia and all those places that I don't have a clue about. Does it not strike you as a bit racist that the only people to be summoned to the ICC since it was founded were Africans?

Cavehill Red · 30-01-2011 9:19pm

0verblood wrote: »

What is it with the Internationa Criminal Court only targeting Africans?

I'm sure there are many other war criminals to go after in other continents, like fcukin Bin Laden for example??? Or whatever happened in Bosnia and Yugoslavia and all those places that I don't have a clue about. Does it not strike you as a bit racist that the only people to be summoned to the ICC since it was founded were Africans?

Racism allegation FAIL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Tribunal_for_the_former_Yugoslavia

Oranage2 · 30-01-2011 9:20pm

ICC?

International Cricket Council?

Nodin · 30-01-2011 9:22pm

It can only try people of countries who sign up, afaik.

Racism allegation FAIL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interna...mer_Yugoslavia

Thats not the ICC, which didn't deal with there because it's before its time.

Cavehill Red · 30-01-2011 9:23pm

Nodin wrote: »

Thats not the ICC.

It's why the ICC doesn't need to try Yugoslavs.

0verblood · 30-01-2011 9:23pm

Cavehill Red wrote: »

Racism allegation FAIL.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Tribunal_for_the_former_Yugoslavia

Ok since you also use Wikipedia how about this snippet:

So far, the International Criminal Court has launched investigations into five situations: Northern Uganda, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, Darfur (Sudan)[1] and the Republic of Kenya.[2]

Oranage2 · 30-01-2011 9:23pm

WIKI wrote: »

Critics, even within the United Nations, have complained of the Tribunal's high cost. The two-year budget for the Tribunal for 2004 and 2005 was $271,854,600 (currently $306 million).[18] The cost is borne by all U.N. members

WOW

Cavehill Red · 30-01-2011 9:25pm

0verblood wrote: »

Ok since you also use Wikipedia how about this snippet:

What about it?
You asked why it hadn't tried Yugoslavs. The answer is because they've already been tried.

smk89 · 30-01-2011 9:28pm

0verblood wrote: »

I'm sure there are many other war criminals to go after in other continents, like fcukin Bin Laden for example???

Try finding him first before putting him on trial

0verblood · 30-01-2011 9:37pm

Cavehill Red wrote: »

What about it?
You asked why it hadn't tried Yugoslavs. The answer is because they've already been tried.

But the thing is, even if he hadn't been tried, they wouldn't go after him. They are only indicting Africans.

Cavehill Red · 30-01-2011 9:38pm

0verblood wrote: »

But the thing is, even if he hadn't been tried, they wouldn't go after him. They are only indicting Africans.

That's a total fail of logic. They cannot try him because he's been tried.

Tallaght Saint · 30-01-2011 9:43pm

I thought this was going to be about cricket. Imagine the disappointment.....

Why does the I.C.C. only target African countries?

Comments