Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Queen of America case (Enge v Trerise)

  • 12-01-2011 11:54pm
    #1
    XxMCRxBabyxX
    Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Basically I'm starting to panic. Studying for my Evidence Law exam tomorrow and I've just realised that I don't have the notes I thought I had on this case! Furthermore it's not in my book or nutshell and all my lecturers slides have on it is the name!

    So as a google search has turned up with nothing I was just wondering if anyone knew where I would be able to find this case or be able to give me a summary on it please! I have the basic gist of it. would just like to make sure that I have everything!

    And I think the name is right! If I'm wrong let me know! It's the hearsay case involving a statement that the accused had called herself the Queen of America that could be used to prove her mental state


Comments

  • #2
    ldxo15wus6fpgm
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭ldxo15wus6fpgm


    I know it's too late now but sure... you might need to repeat :p god forbid.
    Canadian case, you have the names right. (1960) 33 WWR 577. British Columbia Court of Appeal.
    Dunno if you have access to the western weekly report but I don't so that's all I can tell you I'm afraid...


  • #3
    XxMCRxBabyxX
    Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 7,441 Mod ✭✭✭✭XxMCRxBabyxX


    Zaylee Salmon Rocker wrote: »
    I know it's too late now but sure... you might need to repeat :p god forbid.
    Canadian case, you have the names right. (1960) 33 WWR 577. British Columbia Court of Appeal.
    Dunno if you have access to the western weekly report but I don't so that's all I can tell you I'm afraid...

    I like your faith in me! :P

    Thanks anyway! Never know when I might need it again! Didn't even need it in the exam in the end! :D


Advertisement