Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

One world currency?

  • 27-11-2010 10:58am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 234 ✭✭


    Seems we are heading that way,the euro on the verge of collapse,the dollar owned more by china than the US sterling borrowed up to the hilt, I am not normally buying into a lot of this stuff but it seems a plausible outcome that they will have to merge at some point. I wont quote the bible but its all there!


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 504 ✭✭✭cypharius


    No it's not. Trading currencies is still a way to make money. Also, there's more then two currencies in the world. Some economies using different currencies are still reasonably stable(Canada, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Australia, these countries are falling on hard times but they're still doing OK and definately have different currencies).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    cypharius wrote: »
    No it's not. Trading currencies is still a way to make money. Also, there's more then two currencies in the world. Some economies using different currencies are still reasonably stable(Canada, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Australia, these countries are falling on hard times but they're still doing OK and definitely have different currencies).
    If (or when, as it is only a matter of time) before there is a one whole currency it will be cashless.

    What the banksters loose out on currency trading they can gain again on on transaction commission. Every single item you purchase with your smart card / GSM NFC phone could carry a commission and it would be very easy to impose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 834 ✭✭✭Reillyman


    If (or when, as it is only a matter of time) before there is a one whole currency it will be cashless.

    What the banksters loose out on currency trading they can gain again on on transaction commission. Every single item you purchase with your smart card / GSM NFC phone could carry a commission and it would be very easy to impose.

    <facepalm>

    If it's so profitable, why would the "banksters" want to form one currency?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Reillyman wrote: »
    <facepalm>

    If it's so profitable, why would the "banksters" want to form one currency?
    Transparency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭squod


    China, Russia quit dollar

    What will we call this new currency?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,070 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    - Introduction of a supra-national reserve currency to be issued by international financial institutions. It seems appropriate to consider the role of IMF in this process and to review the feasibility of and the need for measures to ensure the recognition of SDRs as a "supra-reserve" currency by the whole world community.

    The obligation to diversify currency structure of the reserves and operations of national banks and international financial organizations should also be provided for.

    In our view, it would be appropriate to submit the results of those studies to the Ministers of Finance and Presidents of the Central Banks of the G20 States with a view to define the most efficient additional steps to harmonize the existing national monetary policies and to implement an efficient reform of IMF.

    We also believe that discussion of the elaborating harmonized rules of "clearing" transborder debts, including by way of coordinating the actions of countries "representing" creditors and debtors, can be launched as part of our action on countering financial protectionism.

    http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/docs/2009/03/213995.shtml


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,379 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    squod wrote: »
    China, Russia quit dollar

    What will we call this new currency?

    That article says that China and Russia have moved from using a common currency for bilateral trade (the dollar) to using their own currencies (ruble and yuan). Care to explain how moving from a single currency to their own currencies for trade, is actually a move towards a single currency?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,894 ✭✭✭✭phantom_lord


    Considering how many people feel the Euro project has failed, I doubt we'll be moving towards a world currency any time soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭squod


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    That article says that China and Russia have moved from using a common currency for bilateral trade (the dollar) to using their own currencies (ruble and yuan). Care to explain how moving from a single currency to their own currencies for trade, is actually a move towards a single currency?


    Last 30seconds.

    The U.S. dollar as a reserve currency era is now finished. People are looking to replace it with another (perhaps global) currency with some gold reserves behind it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,894 ✭✭✭✭phantom_lord


    Seems we are heading that way,the euro on the verge of collapse,the dollar owned more by china than the US sterling borrowed up to the hilt, I am not normally buying into a lot of this stuff but it seems a plausible outcome that they will have to merge at some point. I wont quote the bible but its all there!

    All the things you mentioned are reasons why they would not merge, not why they would.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    squod wrote: »
    China, Russia quit dollar

    What will we call this new currency?

    Well, the IMF report believes that the adoption of a true global currency administered by a global central bank is the answer.

    The authors of the report believe that it would be ideal if the "Bancor" would immediately be used as currency by many nations throughout the world, but they also acknowledge that a more "realistic" approach would be for the "Bancor" to circulate alongside national currencies at first.

    http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/bancor-the-name-of-the-global-currency-a-shocking-imf-report-urges-the-world-to-adopt


    they seem to have that part sorted


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,410 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    cypharius wrote: »
    No it's not. Trading currencies is still a way to make money. Also, there's more then two currencies in the world. Some economies using different currencies are still reasonably stable(Canada, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Australia, these countries are falling on hard times but they're still doing OK and definately have different currencies).

    Since when is Australia falling on hard times, we're enjoying a boom.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Considering how many people feel the Euro project has failed, I doubt we'll be moving towards a world currency any time soon.
    I believe all these "failures" are deliberate. they create a problem control the reaction with the media and then offer the obvious solution.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,894 ✭✭✭✭phantom_lord


    I believe all these "failures" are deliberate. they create a problem control the reaction with the media and then offer the obvious solution.

    the most obvious solution is not a one world currency, quite the opposite.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,619 ✭✭✭fontanalis


    So how many Zimbabwean Dollars would equal one unit of this new currency?


Advertisement