Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bailout or loan

  • 18-11-2010 11:49am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭


    Whats the difference? Will they dictate our internal affairs or do we just pay back interest.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭stevedublin


    You've answered your own question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭Buford T Justice


    The difference is the spin that FF will put on a Bailout and thus turning it into a loan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,588 ✭✭✭femur61


    You've answered your own question.

    No I didn't.

    I asked do they 1) dictate our internal OR 2) do we just pay the loan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    femur61 wrote: »
    No I didn't.

    I asked do they 1) dictate our internal OR 2) do we just pay the loan.

    1) = Bailout
    2) = loan


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,262 ✭✭✭Buford T Justice


    femur61 wrote: »
    No I didn't.

    I asked do they 1) dictate our internal OR 2) do we just pay the loan.

    Either one will come with Conditions from the IMF about Financial reductions that must be made - Translation They have control of our financial affairs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    But it depends on the conditions. If they tell us to raise CT then it is a bailout, if it is to tear up the Croke Park Agreement then it's a really good bailout. A loan offer based on stabilising the bank situation will probably attach restructuring conditions which would be such that we should be undertaking regardless.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    Considering nobody else will lend to us, one guy saying we'll lend to you even though nobody else trusts you to give you time to turn yourself around is what I would call a bailout not a loan.

    A loan implies the person expects to be paid back but generally will not get involved in the day to day running of your business by attaching harsh conditions on giving you the loan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭marathont


    If we have to pay back the money + Interest. Then its a loan. A bailout is a gift.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 268 ✭✭Martin 2


    marathont wrote: »
    If we have to pay back the money + Interest. Then its a loan. A bailout is a gift.

    From Wikipedia
    A bailout is an act of loaning or giving capital to an entity (a company, a country, or an individual) that is in danger of failing, in an attempt to save it from bankruptcy, insolvency, or total liquidation and ruin; or to allow a failing entity to fail gracefully without spreading contagion.
    We are getting loans, that we wouldn't get otherwise, to bail out the banks and prevent them from collapse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,376 ✭✭✭ei.sdraob


    marathont wrote: »
    If we have to pay back the money + Interest. Then its a loan. A bailout is a gift.

    Considering that no one else is willing to loan at normal rates, one could think of it as a gift (with strings attached)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 692 ✭✭✭gleep


    Ah, sure it's only a Dig-out. Then we're going to win a few squid on de horses, change it into sterling and lodge it with AIB, but forget we did, everyone's a winner!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    marathont wrote: »
    If we have to pay back the money + Interest. Then its a loan. A bailout is a gift.

    In terms of bailouts at the state or bank level, a bailout is only ever a loan. Any loan we get is a bailout, because that's what a bailout is. Nobody has given the Greeks free money either - they got a preferential loan, neither more nor less.

    As to dictating internal affairs - they can dictate the conditions of our getting the loan, and we still pay back the loan and the interest.

    Think of it as debt consolidation - there are always conditions, and you still have to pay back the loan. Some of the conditions are likely to be, as they would be in any debt consolidation arrangement, restriction of our access to other credit sources (not the market, but probably the ECB).

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,296 ✭✭✭RandolphEsq


    Would there be less strings attached to a loan than to a bailout? e.g. corporation tax raising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Would there be less strings attached to a loan than to a bailout? e.g. corporation tax raising.

    No, because they're exactly the same thing. There was never a point at which anyone was offering to simply give us the money. Neither the IMF nor any other lender of last resort are in that business - they are lenders of last resort.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,718 ✭✭✭SkepticOne


    It is a bailout. Whenever you hear about a country being bailed out by the IMF, it is in the form of a loan.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭Boskowski




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭bryaner




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,012 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    bryaner wrote: »

    his working hours are all wrong.

    Its more like 10-12 and 3-4 :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    Boskowski wrote: »

    And right after anyone wastes their time reading that 'gem' of a sticky, Know that I also wondered how such a useless OP got so many thanks
    Is this the low standard necessary for an OP to be stickied?? Pedantism from a FF blowhard?? The IMF may as well make the cuts.

    If you hand me over your purse that is your choice. Is it still considered your choice if you hand it over because I've a knife to your throat? Leaving aside whether we deserve losing our sovereignty or whether the economy was destroyed before the IMF comes in, it is pure pedantism to say that when the IMF come into a country that 'they don't make cuts, the government does'. If you 'force' someone to do something then you can't maintain that the choice is still theirs. Their free will (if you believe in such a thing) is hugely dimished when they are given ultimatums and conditions.

    When can we have a thread stickied that outlines how cancerous FF are to democracy and the people? We all need a constant reminder of the damage they've done rather thasn a pedantic discussion on who will be making the cuts as a result of their failures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    And right after anyone wastes their time reading that 'gem' of a sticky, Know that I also wondered how such a useless OP got so many thanks
    The words Bruising and Cruising keep coming into my mind whenever I see you posts.

    Why is that? LOL :D;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,693 ✭✭✭Laminations


    ArtSmart wrote: »
    The words Bruising and Cruising keep coming into my mind whenever I see you posts.

    Why is that? LOL :D;)

    It's a genuine wonder of mine how that 'one simple fact' deserves a sticky when there are countless other more important and less pedantic facts that people should be reminded of. Does it really matter to the debate that 'technically' the IMF or anyone offering us cash dont go and sit in the Dail and openly make decisions. The conditions of any bailout guides whatever government is in power


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,614 ✭✭✭ArtSmart


    It's a genuine wonder of mine how that 'one simple fact' deserves a sticky when there are countless other more important and less pedantic facts that people should be reminded of. Does it really matter to the debate that 'technically' the IMF or anyone offering us cash dont go and sit in the Dail and openly make decisions. The conditions of any bailout guides whatever government is in power
    My reading is this.

    There's a lot of ridiculous talk and panic going around to the direction that the IMF take over a country, essentially replacing the elected government.

    That type of thinking has a way of spreading.

    So yes, the point made by Nintyniner is an important one for general public welfare = sticky.


Advertisement