Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Just failed NCT - still within limits

  • 17-11-2010 4:34pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭


    Hi all

    Just need your advice on something.

    I just failed my NCT because the wishbone bushes were worn.

    I was aware of this and actually ordered new ones and had them in the glovebox - I didn't have time to fit them as I have been very busy this week.

    Car flew through the nct earlier but tester failed it because of the worn bushes and he said I need to get them changed and have it retested (which costs €28) because i needed to resit the "slide slip test"

    When i arrived home i went through the Report sheet to see how the car did.

    The first test reading is the Side-slip/Alignment test for which my result was -13.0m/Km and the parameters for passing are +14 to -14(m/Km)

    I know im right at the boundary and the bushes are indeed worn but I dont see why i have to go through the hassle of sitting a retest and paying another €28 euro if the car was entitled to pass and was not out of the set parameters.

    Also notice the way on the results sheet it says N/A as opposed to FAIL


    Am I missing something?? :confused:

    Just thought id ask here before going back to the test centre.

    Thanks for any advice

    nct001.jpg

    nct002.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭hi_im_fil


    You failed the test due to worn bushes and not due to the slip test. But when you put in the new bushes it could have an affect on the slip test, so thats why it has to be done again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    ION08 wrote: »

    Am I missing something?? :confused:


    You are.

    They didn't fail your car for side slip/alignment test, but for loose bushings.
    They can't be loose.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,615 ✭✭✭kildare.17hmr


    Within the limits alright but the tester obviously seen they needed to be changed or they were in such a bad state and failed on that.


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Within the limits alright but the tester obviously seen they needed to be changed or they were in such a bad state and failed on that.

    Bushes are worn, need to be replaced, replacing them may alter the alignment so that needs retesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭ION08


    hi_im_fil wrote: »
    You failed the test due to worn bushes and not due to the slip test. But when you put in the new bushes it could have an affect on the slip test, so thats why it has to be done again.

    Well if i didnt fail the Slip test , then I dont see why I have to re sit that test and pay €28 for the privelege??

    Sorry, dont mean to be akward but im not fully satisfied that it should have failed and i have to resit a €28 test which i didnt theoretically fail?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    ION08 wrote: »
    Well if i didnt fail the Slip test , then I dont see why I have to re sit that test and pay €28 for the privelege??

    Sorry, dont mean to be akward but im not fully satisfied that it should have failed and i have to resit a €28 test which i didnt theoretically fail?

    OK, baby steps.......

    - u passed the slip test
    - you have worn suspension bushings observed visually by the tester
    - these do need to be replaced
    - tie rod ends etc will need to be loosened or removed to facilitate replacement of these bushings
    - this can effect allignment so the allignment will need to be tested along with the bushings
    - regardless of the alignment the car needs to go on a ramp to verify the bushings have been replaced

    Happy now ? :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    ION08 wrote: »
    Well if i didnt fail the Slip test , then I dont see why I have to re sit that test and pay €28 for the privelege??

    Sorry, dont mean to be akward but im not fully satisfied that it should have failed and i have to resit a €28 test which i didnt theoretically fail?

    You have to resit test and pay 28euros because how else are they going to check if you fit new bushings? That's not visual inspection, because bushings can't be easily seen from the outside.

    It's like you were surprised that you failed a test on leaking brake hose, because test of brake force on all wheels were fine.
    That's very similar example.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭ION08


    RoverJames wrote: »
    OK, baby steps.......

    - u passed the slip test
    - you have worn suspension bushings observed visually by the tester
    - these do need to be replaced
    - tie rod ends etc will need to be loosened or removed to facilitate replacement of these bushings
    - this can effect allignment so the allignment will need to be tested along with the bushings
    - regardless of the alignment the car needs to go on a ramp to verify the bushings have been replaced

    Happy now ? :)

    Hmm, kind of. I was under the impression that the worn bushings were the source of the -13 reading , which is pretty bad and the tester took it upon himself to fail it "visually" even thought the bushes weren't worn past a minimum level so to speak.

    Anyway, i know they need to be changed (i inspected them myself as they were making a slight knocking sound and they werent actually too bad) - i have them bought already just didnt have time to fit them yet.

    Still I think the tester was being a prick .. and then had the cheek to ask me to burn him a copy of the CD that was playing in my car and drop it back up to him when i come for the "retest" :rolleyes:

    ... If he was sound i would have just given him the damn CD (but thats slightly off topic :D )


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,069 ✭✭✭✭CiniO


    ION08 wrote: »
    Hmm, kind of. I was under the impression that the worn bushings were the source of the -13 reading , which is pretty bad and the tester took it upon himself to fail it "visually" even thought the bushes weren't worn past a minimum level so to speak.

    Anyway, i know they need to be changed (i inspected them myself as they were making a slight knocking sound and they werent actually too bad) - i have them bought already just didnt have time to fit them yet.

    Still I think the tester was being a prick .. and then had the cheek to ask me to burn him a copy of the CD that was playing in my car and drop it back up to him when i come for the "retest" :rolleyes:

    ... If he was sound i would have just given him the damn CD (but thats slightly off topic :D )

    I think you still don't really get the whole idea.
    Slip test/allignment test are completely separate thing from visual inspection of bushings.
    They are even in complete separate parts of NCT manual: http://www.ncts.ie/pdf/nctmanual.pdf

    And that one affects the other one, is just an coincidence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 807 ✭✭✭Divorce Referendum


    ION08 wrote: »
    Hmm, kind of. I was under the impression that the worn bushings were the source of the -13 reading , which is pretty bad and the tester took it upon himself to fail it "visually" even thought the bushes weren't worn past a minimum level so to speak.

    Anyway, i know they need to be changed (i inspected them myself as they were making a slight knocking sound and they werent actually too bad) - i have them bought already just didnt have time to fit them yet.

    Still I think the tester was being a prick .. and then had the cheek to ask me to burn him a copy of the CD that was playing in my car and drop it back up to him when i come for the "retest" :rolleyes:

    ... If he was sound i would have just given him the damn CD (but thats slightly off topic :D )

    How was he being a prick? Say for arguments sake you replace those bushings next week. When you replace them the alignment will be definitely be out requiring the car to be tracked. If you dont track it send it for the test and he checks the bushes and not the the side slip like you want well then he will be passing a car thats not right.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 bozley


    I'm with you on this one!!
    Last march I failed nct on tracking (or so I thought). Booked re-test and on morning before test got the tracking done on the way to nct centre. The mechanic guy told me tracking wasn't too bad and shouldn't have failed. I showed him the report and he said my tracking rods were worn down and they needed to be ordered. I thought 'feck it' not losing my 28 euro and carried on anyway. Jeep went in and passed!!!! Hubby changed rods few days later!! It's a great way for the government to get extra revenue!! The bare-arsed cheek of him then to ask for cd!!;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,525 ✭✭✭ION08


    CiniO wrote: »
    I think you still don't really get the whole idea.
    Slip test/allignment test are completely separate thing from visual inspection of bushings.
    They are even in complete separate parts of NCT manual: http://www.ncts.ie/pdf/nctmanual.pdf

    And that one affects the other one, is just an coincidence.

    I get the idea (now that rover james has spelt it out :D ) I was just saying what I thought was the case beforehand.

    I'll fit the bushings tomorrow and the retest is booked for Friday. ... hes not getting a CD though


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,584 ✭✭✭TouchingVirus


    My tyres passed the tread-depth test, but one had a strutural defect (bulge) so I failed. My tyre's defect has nothing to do with the thread depth, even though they are both related (i.e. checks to do with tyres). When I get the new tyres the mechanic will run through all tyre-related tests again.

    Same scenario for you - you passed the slip test, but your bushings were worn. They are defective and need to be replaced. Unfortunately for you, by replacing them you're messing around with stuff that's been tested to be within spec beforehand, but might not be within spec afterwards. This restest involves using the NCT equipment again so you have to pay.

    Might I suggest an earlier service for next time? :o


  • Posts: 23,339 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    bozley wrote: »
    I'm with you on this one!!
    Last march I failed nct on tracking (or so I thought). Booked re-test and on morning before test got the tracking done on the way to nct centre. The mechanic guy told me tracking wasn't too bad and shouldn't have failed. I showed him the report and he said my tracking rods were worn down and they needed to be ordered. I thought 'feck it' not losing my 28 euro and carried on anyway. Jeep went in and passed!!!! Hubby changed rods few days later!! It's a great way for the government to get extra revenue!! The bare-arsed cheek of him then to ask for cd!!;)

    If you failed on tracking you failed on tracking, a peak at the test results would confirm that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 bozley


    And give him a blank cd!!:D


Advertisement