'Sickening' act with dog leaves rugby star's career in ruins

Auvers

what the fcuk :eek:

http://www.thestar.com/sports/article/886325--sickening-act-with-dog-leaves-rugby-star-s-career-in-ruins

Sykk

Inb4 gave the dog a bone

biko

No linking to pictures please, not joking.

kelle

The title would make you believe the dog was responsible for ending this rugby star's career!

What a sicko.

liah

Sick bastard. :mad:

star-pants

That's disgusting.... what's just as bad:

Bestiality is not a crime in Australia

... seriously?

TouchingVirus

He had the absent teammate's dog lick his knob. Crazy stuff

Duggy747

Even The Star's website is as shìt as their paper.

I've heard of man's best friend but..................day-um!!

enda1

What did he do though?

M5

Jasus thats a bit Ruff

mikom

Obviously "Touch, hold, engage" is not an appropriate dog command.

TouchingVirus

biko wrote: »

No linking to pictures please, not joking.

Even censored pics? :pac:

SoupyNorman

He really screwed the pooch on that one.



**awaits projectiles**

Auvers

enda1 wrote: »

What did he do though?

A shocking photo has emerged featuring Canberra Raiders and Australian rugby league star Joel Monaghan in a compromising position with a dog. Monaghan is shown holding the dog by the ears, while the dog appears to be licking Monaghan's genitals.

Ghost Train

Yes I thought this was about some career ending injury due to being mauled by dog, with some injury photo :pac:

easyeason3

No point in Monaghan thinking he's the dogs bollocks now.



Seriously though, what a creep, it's sick.

MitchKoobski

Duggy747 wrote: »

Even The Star's website is as shìt as their paper.

I've heard of man's best friend but..................day-um!!

Think its the Toronto Star, and not the tabloid we know of....

enda1

Auvers wrote: »

A shocking photo has emerged featuring Canberra Raiders and Australian rugby league star Joel Monaghan in a compromising position with a dog. Monaghan is shown holding the dog by the ears, while the dog appears to be licking Monaghan's genitals.

Bit of a storm in a teacup then no?

Why do people give such a **** about this? Its not like the dog minded.

mike65

Australians eh?

M5

Sit!
roll over!
lick my nuts!

00112984

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mRIsA5XcC0

Auvers

enda1 wrote: »

Bit of a storm in a teacup then no?

Why do people give such a **** about this? Its not like the dog minded.

hhhmmmm very suspect

Duggy747

MitchKoobski wrote: »

Think its the Toronto Star, and not the tabloid we know of....

I noticed that now............................it's still a shìt paper :pac:

Maybe the dog likes knob cheese?

TouchingVirus

Auvers wrote: »

hhhmmmm very suspect

:rolleyes:

Just because somebody doesn't see the big deal doesn't mean he's a fan/participant of beastiality

MitchKoobski

Not nearly enough puns for the first two pages of an AH thread.

Princess Peach

The world is a sad sad place

seamus

From what I can tell, he exposed himself to the dog in an attempt to get the dog to lick his balls.

Stupid yes, but neither sickening nor cruel nor a hanging offence IMO.

Duggy747

Could've been worse......





























He could've been licking the dog's balls.

abouttobebanned

Honestly I thought he wanked the Dog or something. Surely this isn't shocking enough to cause all this outrage? I'm sure he put some chum on there to entice the dog. Everybody's happy.*








*I of course do not condone such behaviour. But there are sicker people out there...

the_monkey

Auvers wrote: »

Originally Posted by enda1
Bit of a storm in a teacup then no?

Why do people give such a **** about this? Its not like the dog minded.
hhhmmmm very suspect

Well he has a point, dont want to be graphic here but if he was buggering the dog it would be a lot worse, but the dog in this case was probably just thinking "yum peanut butter" ....

Still a sick act, but don't think the guy should lose his career over it .

Princess Peach

seamus wrote: »

From what I can tell, he exposed himself to the dog in an attempt to get the dog to lick his balls.

Stupid yes, but neither sickening nor cruel nor a hanging offence IMO.

Note to self- Do not let seamus near my dog

DonJose

Dirty scrum bag!!!

Osgoodisgood

seamus wrote: »

From what I can tell, he exposed himself to the dog in an attempt to get the dog to lick his balls.

Stupid yes, but neither sickening nor cruel nor a hanging offence IMO.

Would you have the same opinion if it were your ears he was hanging on to?

bonerm

Was Nurofen taken?

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

you really think the dogs gona mind?

mike65

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar wrote: »

you really think the dogs gona mind?

Dunno but does he have children? WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN! :eek:

Auvers

TouchingVirus wrote: »

:rolleyes:

Just because somebody doesn't see the big deal doesn't mean he's a fan/participant of beastiality

sweet Jesus

phill106

What is this I dont even...

pickarooney

I often wonder if people have any sort of scale of outrage or if every single thing even remotely out of the ordinary goes all the way up to 11 on the scandalometer. Most days it's like a competition on the internet to see who can get the most offended.

TheBlock

phill106 wrote: »

What is this I dont even...

Phill..PHIL are you ok? Can somene check on Phil please?

My name is URL

seamus wrote: »

From what I can tell, he exposed himself to the dog in an attempt to get the dog to lick his balls.

Stupid yes, but neither sickening nor cruel nor a hanging offence IMO.

He appears to be forcing his schlong down the dogs throat in the pic, seems cruel enough to me tbh

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

mike65 wrote: »

Dunno but does he have children? WONT SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN! :eek:

wonder if he'd have been labelled a paedophile if it was a puppy

liamh22

mikom wrote: »

Obviously "Touch, hold, engage" is not an appropriate dog command.

Surely the command should be

Crouch, Touch, Paws, Engage

WIZE

What do you call a Dog with Steel Balls and no Back Legs ?


























Sparky

Duggy747

My name is URL wrote: »

He appears to be forcing his schlong down the dogs throat in the pic, seems cruel enough to me tbh

Height of intelligence right there when you decide to put your willy in a dog's mouth.

Title should read Sickening’ act with dog leaves rugby star’s genitals in ruins

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar wrote: »

wonder if he'd have been labelled a paedophile if it was a puppy

A Pupophile?

seamus

My name is URL wrote: »

He appears to be forcing his schlong down the dogs throat in the pic, seems cruel enough to me tbh

Ah. See that part is blurred out in the picture I saw cos there's no way in hell I'm looking at it in work.

If that's the case then it's a different matter, minor animal cruelty charges (the dog doesn't know the difference between having a penis or a finger put in its mouth) and a reason to point and laugh at him. But assuming that was just an incidental thing (i.e. he didn't fnck the dog's head), then the dog is unharmed. The end of his career? Criminal charges? Come on people, a bit of perspective...

Nulty

Rugby players.....my expectations have been met and surpassed

the_monkey

http://static.stuff.co.nz/1281865419/636/4026636.jpg

fonecrusher1

Wow what a fcuking moron. Basically he's going to have to carry the burden of being 'that guy that was in the photo with the dog' for the rest of his days. Thats a lifelong punishment for a few seconds of stupidity.

Princess Peach

seamus wrote: »

Ah. See that part is blurred out in the picture I saw cos there's no way in hell I'm looking at it in work.

If that's the case then it's a different matter, minor animal cruelty charges (the dog doesn't know the difference between having a penis or a finger put in its mouth) and a reason to point and laugh at him. But assuming that was just an incidental thing (i.e. he didn't fnck the dog's head), then the dog is unharmed. The end of his career? Criminal charges? Come on people, a bit of perspective...

Neither does a child.....


Too far?

gleep

Princess Peach wrote: »

Neither does a child.....


Too far?

As Churchill would say, "Oohhh Yes"