Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

TAIN number

  • 30-10-2010 4:29pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45


    does a tax adviser lose his TAIN number if his own affairs are not up to date?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭nompere


    does a tax adviser lose his TAIN number if his own affairs are not up to date?

    No, of course not. A TAIN is designed to make Revenue's life easier.

    Mind you the tax adviser can expect a larger proportion of his clients to be audited than other advisers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,685 ✭✭✭barneystinson


    nompere wrote: »
    Mind you the tax adviser can expect a larger proportion of his clients to be audited than other advisers.

    Really? How so?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,724 ✭✭✭kennyb3


    TBH any tax advisor planning to continue in practice is going to have their tax affairs up to date, if they cant do their own how can they do others?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,678 ✭✭✭nompere


    Really? How so?

    The Revenue audit programme is largely risk-based. A tax adviser who can't keep his own affairs up to date is likely to be perceived as a greater risk than the guy who does file on time.

    So one downside of the TAIN system is that Revenue can more easily track the clients of a particular adviser.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,685 ✭✭✭barneystinson


    nompere wrote: »
    The Revenue audit programme is largely risk-based.

    I know, I was being a bit facetious there, but seriously there's presently no REAP rule that fires based on TAIN. So in isolation, who your agent is doesn't make a taxpayer any more likely to be selected for audit, YET.

    Of course, if 2 identical cases are being screened for audit, and the screener knows one of the agents to be irreputable, then all other things being equal, it is common sense to audit the one with the "dodgy" agent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭MBateson


    Are the REAP rules available for people to know what they are?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 998 ✭✭✭maddogcollins


    MBateson wrote: »
    Are the REAP rules available for people to know what they are?

    There are no published rules that I am aware of but http://bit.ly/cekdzz may give you an understanding of how the systems works and scores people.


Advertisement