Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland still a sponging basket case

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Details here, tables 10 and 11:

    From the EU: €1,810.8 million
    To the EU: €1,486.3 million

    Breakdown:

    European Agricultural Guidance& Guarantee Fund (FEOGA): €0.7m
    European Agriculture Guarantee Fund (EAGF): €1,319m
    EAGF Rural Development: €329.2m
    European Social Fund: €42.8m
    European Regional Development Fund: €57.7m
    Cohesion Fund: €22.9m
    Other: €38.4m

    So, yes, 91% agriculture.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 240 ✭✭pablo_escobar


    Paying farmers not to be farmers.. makes perfect sense to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,005 ✭✭✭ashleey


    We are paying them to protect the environment, surely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    There's no longer any such thing as 'set-aside' - farmers are subsidised on the basis of complying with good land conditions, public, animal and plant health standards as well as environmental requirements.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭PanchoVilla


    So why don't we just keep the €1.3 billion and deal with our own agriculture? Why are we giving the EU so much money just so they can give it back to us with conditions? Why don't they just give the Dept. of Agriculture a list of what conditions we're required to meet and let us take care of our own business instead of wasting millions on administration costs?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭PanchoVilla


    Scofflaw wrote: »
    There's no longer any such thing as 'set-aside' - farmers are subsidised on the basis of complying with good land conditions, public, animal and plant health standards as well as environmental requirements.

    cordially,
    Scofflaw

    Eh, that's not entirely true.
    The farmers must also set aside part of their land, except land used for organic production or for materials not intended for human or animal consumption.

    http://www.2007-2013.eu/by_scope_eagf.php


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,283 ✭✭✭✭Scofflaw


    Eh, that's not entirely true.



    http://www.2007-2013.eu/by_scope_eagf.php

    Abolished in the CAP Health Check in 2008:
    Abolition of set-aside: The requirement for arable farmers to leave 10 percent of their land fallow is abolished. This will allow them to maximise their production potential.

    Source

    cordially,
    Scofflaw


Advertisement