Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cross-party talks on budget dead in the water.

  • 20-10-2010 10:14pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,087 ✭✭✭


    Cross-party cuts deal 'killed off'
    The prospect of cross-party support on multi-billion euro spending cuts has been effectively killed off after talks between Taoiseach Brian Cowen and the opposition failed to reach consensus.

    Labour and Fine Gael vowed to come up with their own budget plans after the two-hour meeting with Mr Cowen and Green Party leader John Gormley.

    Both opposition parties said there would be no further meetings between the leaders.

    Looks like the cross-party talks are already doomed. I really wish someone would come straight out and say what the hell is going on.
    Not sure if there would have been any real advantage ( from a political pov) to the opposition parties going down the cross-party route anyway, but could this mean that the situation is even more dire than anyone thought, and they don't want to touch it ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,834 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall of that meeting. It'd be interesting to hear what they say to each other when there aren't any microphones around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭zootroid


    I didn't hold out much hope for it to be honest. I think Cowen is too stubborn, and too "tribal" for want of a better word to be taking advice from other political parties. And I think FG and Labour are probably thinking "why the hell should we help you?"

    But the main reason they failed is ideological differences between the three main parties.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Head The Wall


    Duiske wrote: »
    Cross-party cuts deal 'killed off'



    Looks like the cross-party talks are already doomed. I really wish someone would come straight out and say what the hell is going on.
    Not sure if there would have been any real advantage ( from a political pov) to the opposition parties going down the cross-party route anyway, but could this mean that the situation is even more dire than anyone thought, and they don't want to touch it ?

    It's only postulating by the parties in Govt to show that they are trying to do whats the best for the country.

    The reality is none of them wanted a part of it, but the country wanted them to want to do the dishes and they were like, why would I want to want to do the dishes :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    zootroid wrote: »
    I didn't hold out much hope for it to be honest. I think Cowen is too stubborn, and too "tribal" for want of a better word to be taking advice from other political parties. And I think FG and Labour are probably thinking "why the hell should we help you?"

    But the main reason they failed is ideological differences between the three main parties.

    I agree with your comment about Brian Cowen: many people seem to have forgotten how deeply tribal he is.

    But if FG and Labour were thinking as you suggest, I would think less of their leaders. They should be thinking of helping us, and not about whether Cowen should be helped or not. I think that some sort of consensus is needed -- not full agreement on everything that might be in the budget, but some agreement on its general shape. That's what we need to have in place so we can fund our borrowing requirement at a reasonable (or less unreasonable) price.

    I don't think there are profound ideological differences between the parties. I think the reason no worthwhile progress was made is that the party leaders are giving more weight to electoral advantage than they are giving to addressing our needs. The opposition leaders probably feel that working towards any cross-party consensus might cost them votes -- and they might be right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,022 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,892 ✭✭✭Head The Wall


    They probably don't trust FF and I wouldn't blame them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,443 ✭✭✭Byron85


    zootroid wrote: »
    But the main reason they failed is ideological differences between the three main parties.


    The Peoples Front of Judea syndrome I think you refer to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭zootroid


    I agree with your comment about Brian Cowen: many people seem to have forgotten how deeply tribal he is.

    But if FG and Labour were thinking as you suggest, I would think less of their leaders. They should be thinking of helping us, and not about whether Cowen should be helped or not. I think that some sort of consensus is needed -- not full agreement on everything that might be in the budget, but some agreement on its general shape. That's what we need to have in place so we can fund our borrowing requirement at a reasonable (or less unreasonable) price.

    I don't think there are profound ideological differences between the parties. I think the reason no worthwhile progress was made is that the party leaders are giving more weight to electoral advantage than they are giving to addressing our needs. The opposition leaders probably feel that working towards any cross-party consensus might cost them votes -- and they might be right.

    Agree with you there.

    On my point about ideological differences, I think FG would be the most aggressive in dealing with the deficit, and Labour the least, with FF in the middle. I think Labour would mainly go for tax increases, while FF would look for the soft targets such as cutting capital expenditure which would keep the unions placated. FG would cut wages, pensions and numbers employed across the public sector.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Duiske wrote: »
    could this mean that the situation is even more dire than anyone thought, and they don't want to touch it ?
    That along with what others have said, Cowen is too stubborn, he's a man you cannot deal with at all, it's either his way or no way. God help us all with this coming budget, I seen enough today on the news when members of the UK parliament were making fun of Brian Lenihan and his mess with budgets.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭irishh_bob


    zootroid wrote: »
    I didn't hold out much hope for it to be honest. I think Cowen is too stubborn, and too "tribal" for want of a better word to be taking advice from other political parties. And I think FG and Labour are probably thinking "why the hell should we help you?"

    But the main reason they failed is ideological differences between the three main parties.

    agree with your 1st paragraph , disagree with your second , we dont do idealogy in this country and i include labour who are to public servants what fianna fail are to everyone ( when they can afford it )


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭irishh_bob


    hellboy99 wrote: »
    That along with what others have said, Cowen is too stubborn, he's a man you cannot deal with at all, it's either his way or no way. God help us all with this coming budget, I seen enough today on the news when members of the UK parliament were making fun of Brian Lenihan and his mess with budgets.

    thiers nothing worse than arrogance and stuborness from a weak and talentless person , i can handle the likes of michael o leary being arrogant but not cowen


Advertisement