Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Abolition of double jeopardy

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭dermot_sheehan


    Article 15.5.1 of the Constitution
    The Oireachtas shall not declare acts to be infringements of the law which were not so at the date of their commission.

    Of course abolishing double jeopardy is a procedural alteration rather then retrospective criminalisation but there is U.S. precedence on the U.S. constitution which bans ex post facto laws which holds a procedural change which makes it more difficult for a defendant to mount a defence is an ex post facto law and unconstitutional. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stogner_v._California)


Advertisement