Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Where Are They Hurling New Horizons?

  • 29-08-2010 12:52am
    #1
    Zillah
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭


    I was reading about New Horizons earlier but I couldn't find the answer to this question. All I can see is that after the Kuiper Belt it's gonna get shot out of the Solar System, do they have any plan as to what star or constellation they're shooting it towards?


Comments

  • #2
    djhaxman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭djhaxman


    I doubt they're sending it anywhere in particular. Basically the thing moves fast by human speeds, but so slow by interstellar speeds it will take thousands of years just to get to the inner edge of the solar system (if the Oort Cloud counts as that) so by the time it gets to any star, if ever, none of us will be around.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055995962


  • #3
    Zillah
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,371 ✭✭✭✭Zillah


    Yes I know all that, but Voyager 1 is set to pass close to AC+79 3888 in about 40,000 years. May as well point NH at a particular star in the hopes that it might be picked up :)


  • #4
    djhaxman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭djhaxman


    Zillah wrote: »
    Yes I know all that, but Voyager 1 is set to pass close to AC+79 3888 in about 40,000 years. May as well point NH at a particular star in the hopes that it might be picked up :)

    I would hope 1.6 light years won't be that big a distance in 40,000 years alright ;)


  • #5
    wylo
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,214 ✭✭✭wylo


    djhaxman wrote: »
    I would hope 1.6 light years won't be that big a distance in 40,000 years alright ;)
    Id say it could be false hope tbh. Unless you can figure out a way of breaking the speed of light.


  • #6
    Cú Giobach
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Cú Giobach


    wylo wrote: »
    Id say it could be false hope tbh. Unless you can figure out a way of breaking the speed of light.

    If we are still around and had continued evolving regarding technology etc, in 40,000 we should have sussed out intergalatic travel without going FTL, eg wormholes, bending space etc. ;)


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    rccaulfield
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭rccaulfield


    wylo wrote: »
    Id say it could be false hope tbh. Unless you can figure out a way of breaking the speed of light.

    I wouldn't ay that! Even if we manage 3/4 the speed of light thats only a 5/6 year flight to our nearest star!


  • #8
    djhaxman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭djhaxman


    rccaulfield wrote: »
    I wouldn't ay that! Even if we manage 3/4 the speed of light thats only a 5/6 year flight to our nearest star!

    Yup, that's what I meant!


Advertisement