Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Chilean Mine Rescue

  • 24-08-2010 05:45PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 669 ✭✭✭


    I found these two outlines of the rescue plan for the guys in the mine in chile

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38807555/ns/world_news-americas

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2010/aug/23/chile-san-jose-mine-trapped-miners

    Both diagrams show a collapse half way down the main circular tunnel but i'm wondering why they are building a 700 meter long lifeline tunnel when it might be an option to go down the existing tunnel and start digging a by-pass tunnel from the face of the collapse to the next level of open tunnel below. I appreciate the newspapers don't have the geology reports of the actual mine, and the scale of the collapse could be larger than shown but wouldn't digging out the existing collapse from a lower position still be an option?


Advertisement