Louis CK

pappyodaniel

Is anyone else a fan of Louis CK? I have to admit I've only heard of him lately but he blows me away, my kind of humour.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmban3Fio14

SlimJ

He's the best in the world right now. Get yourself a copy of his "Shameless" and "Chewed Up" DVD's toot sweet.

He's also got a show in the US called "Louie", you should track it down online.

pappyodaniel

SlimJ wrote: »

He's the best in the world right now. Get yourself a copy of his "Shameless" and "Chewed Up" DVD's toot sweet.

He's also got a show in the US called "Louie", you should track it down online.

Agreed, he's the first comedian I've heard in a long while that actually makes me LOL :rolleyes:

Ya, I've gotten everything by him, Louie's great, there's another show of his that ran for one series on HBO before it got cancelled, a sitcom called LUCKY LOUIE, it's very good!

Gross Halfwit

SlimJ wrote: »

He's the best in the world right now. Get yourself a copy of his "Shameless" and "Chewed Up" DVD's toot sweet.

He's also got a show in the US called "Louie", you should track it down online.

Seconded.

scientific1982

SlimJ wrote: »

He's the best in the world right now. Get yourself a copy of his "Shameless" and "Chewed Up" DVD's toot sweet.

He's also got a show in the US called "Louie", you should track it down online.

Agree 100%. Hes the best doing stand up. Probably my favourite comedian of all time at this stage.

krudler

Love him as well, Hilarious should be..well, hilarious.

The Nal

Silentcorner

Woke/Outrage culture has damaged comedy.

There is no getting away from it.

The question is when will the damage stop?

I don't really see what is stopping Louis ck from making a comeback. What he did was minor in comparison to all that metoo stuff. He abused his position of power but he asked for permission and he got it granted. How long does this imaginary conviction last.

Quandary

Love his brand of stand up. Also watched his series, well worth a watch too.

we'llallhavetea

Deleted User wrote: »

I don't really see what is stopping Louis ck from making a comeback. What he did was minor in comparison to all that metoo stuff. He abused his position of power but he asked for permission and he got it granted. How long does this imaginary conviction last.

What the actual fcuk. Yeah louis is a great comedian, I really enjoy his comedy! He is also a total sexual predator. Get with it man, you can't whip your dick out and start tugging just because you asked AS YOU WERE PULLING YOUR DICK OUT.

we'llallhavetea

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

What the actual fcuk. Yeah louis is a great comedian, I really enjoy his comedy! He is also a total sexual predator. Get with it man, you can't whip your dick out and start tugging just because you asked AS YOU WERE PULLING YOUR DICK OUT.

Even if it happened as you described, which I wasn't under that impression, that makes him a pervert rather than a sexual predator. He's not even close to level of Weinstein. Same question again regardless, how long does this imaginary conviction last for?

s7ryf3925pivug

There's about 40 min of new material on youtube, recorded from a recent show. He's in the news for it because he takes the piss out of those school shooting survivors who are publicising themselves, and he's being criticised for portraying himself as the victim in the metoo stuff. (This is a bit of a stretch imo.)

I thought it was pretty funny. Some of the criticism is a bit silly. If you don't want to listen to him because you're disgusted by his behaviour then fair enough. Outrage because he uses about being reviled and losing money (38 million apparently) as material for comedy is silly though.

Funniest stuff I've heard him do. Different tone now - more aggressive.

s7ryf3925pivug

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPwTJvTGFtk

The Nal

we'llallhavetea

Deleted User wrote: »

Even if it happened as you described, which I wasn't under that impression, that makes him a pervert rather than a sexual predator. He's not even close to level of Weinstein. Same question again regardless, how long does this imaginary conviction last for?

Em nope, he is a predator, he has clocked up quite a list over the years. Why does he have to be "close to the level of weinstein"? That really makes zero sense tbh, he's an asshole, he abused his position of power over many women. There's really no defending it unless you think he has done nothing wrong and in that case, I would advise you go get your head checked.
Also his 2017 stand up special was nowhere near as good as his other stuff, he's Not gonna be making a comeback imo

The Nal

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

Em nope, he is a predator, he has clocked up quite a list over the years. Why does he have to be "close to the level of weinstein"? That really makes zero sense tbh, he's an asshole, he abused his position of power over many women. There's really no defending it unless you think he has done nothing wrong and in that case, I would advise you go get your head checked.
Also his 2017 stand up special was nowhere near as good as his other stuff, he's Not gonna be making a comeback imo

Depends really. People are extremely hypocritical when it comes to this stuff. Mike Tyson raped someone - never admitted to it and never apologised - but appears on Ellen, who doesn't question him about it.

David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Jimmy Page, Iggy Pop etc were paedophiles (look up Sable Starr and Lori Maddox) but people think they are Gods.

Lots of fingers in ears "lalalala" when it suits people.

we'llallhavetea

The Nal wrote: »

Depends really. People are extremely hypocritical when it comes to this stuff. Mike Tyson raped someone - never admitted to it and never apologised - but appears on Ellen, who doesn't question him about it.

David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Jimmy Page, Iggy Pop etc were paedophiles (look up Sable Starr and Lori Maddox) but people think they are Gods.

Lots of fingers in ears "lalalala" when it suits people.

I don't think today's generation are going to forget the onslaught of celeb deviants somehow. It's a whole big thing, it's great really, these people shouldn't get away with it!
Gonna look that up now, didn't know about bowie!

s7ryf3925pivug

The Nal wrote: »

Depends really. People are extremely hypocritical when it comes to this stuff. Mike Tyson raped someone - never admitted to it and never apologised - but appears on Ellen, who doesn't question him about it.

David Bowie, Mick Jagger, Jimmy Page, Iggy Pop etc were paedophiles (look up Sable Starr and Lori Maddox) but people think they are Gods.

Lots of fingers in ears "lalalala" when it suits people.

I looked them up. Seems pretty clear that Page and Pop slept with underage girls. Seems unlikely Bowie did, and I don't see much evidence that Jagger did. Though I think your point stands pretty well even so.

Not that closely related, but a lot of Page's material was clealry plagiarised.

The Nal

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

I don't think today's generation are going to forget the onslaught of celeb deviants somehow. It's a whole big thing, it's great really, these people shouldn't get away with it!
Gonna look that up now, didn't know about bowie!

A load of those 60s and 70s rock stars would be in jail and their careers finished if it were today.

Keyla Sticky Pantyhose wrote: »

I looked them up. Seems pretty clear that Page and Pop slept with underage girls. Seems unlikely Bowie did, and I don't see much evidence that Jagger did.

https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/i-lost-my-virginity-to-david-bowie

https://jezebel.com/what-should-we-say-about-david-bowie-and-lori-maddox-1754533894

https://mic.com/articles/132399/the-complicated-sexual-history-of-david-bowie#.rA44Q72pC

https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/music/david-bowie-and-the-15-year-old-girls-7962946

Though I think your point stands pretty well even so.

Keyla Sticky Pantyhose wrote: »

Not that closely related, but a lot of Page's material was clealry plagiarised.

As was the material he nicked. Everyone nicks it.

Anyway Louis CK has a few **** in front of adults and hes the devil. Bowie and Jimmy Page have sex with kids they're Gods.

Bill Wyman goes full paedo in public yet the Stones tour a year later and 6 million people turn out to see them.

Its an odd one.

we'llallhavetea

Jesus.... wtf! Bowie apparently took one of their virginities at aged 15. Gross. Ugh.

s7ryf3925pivug

The Nal wrote: »

A load of those 60s and 70s rock stars would be in jail and their careers finished if it were today.



https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/i-lost-my-virginity-to-david-bowie

https://jezebel.com/what-should-we-say-about-david-bowie-and-lori-maddox-1754533894

https://mic.com/articles/132399/the-complicated-sexual-history-of-david-bowie#.rA44Q72pC

https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/music/david-bowie-and-the-15-year-old-girls-7962946

Though I think your point stands pretty well even so.



As was the material he nicked. Everyone nicks it.

Anyway Louis CK has a few **** in front of adults and hes the devil. Bowie and Jimmy Page have sex with kids they're Gods.

Bill Wyman goes full paedo in public yet the Stones tour a year later and 6 million people turn out to see them.

Its an odd one.

Yeah I meant a lot of Page's most famous riffs were clearly plagiarised, as in he plagiarised other people.

Autecher

Keyla Sticky Pantyhose wrote: »

There's about 40 min of new material on youtube, recorded from a recent show. He's in the news for it because he takes the piss out of those school shooting survivors who are publicising themselves, and he's being criticised for portraying himself as the victim in the metoo stuff. (This is a bit of a stretch imo.)

I thought it was pretty funny. Some of the criticism is a bit silly. If you don't want to listen to him because you're disgusted by his behaviour then fair enough. Outrage because he uses about being reviled and losing money (38 million apparently) as material for comedy is silly though.

Funniest stuff I've heard him do. Different tone now - more aggressive.

I thought it was poor, I know he's only working the material out so it's all a work in progress and we're not supposed to hear it so I won't be too harsh about it but he's capable of much much better than that.

Adamocovic

The Nal wrote: »

A load of those 60s and 70s rock stars would be in jail and their careers finished if it were today.



https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/i-lost-my-virginity-to-david-bowie

https://jezebel.com/what-should-we-say-about-david-bowie-and-lori-maddox-1754533894

https://mic.com/articles/132399/the-complicated-sexual-history-of-david-bowie#.rA44Q72pC

https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/music/david-bowie-and-the-15-year-old-girls-7962946

Though I think your point stands pretty well even so.



As was the material he nicked. Everyone nicks it.

Anyway Louis CK has a few **** in front of adults and hes the devil. Bowie and Jimmy Page have sex with kids they're Gods.

Bill Wyman goes full paedo in public yet the Stones tour a year later and 6 million people turn out to see them.

Its an odd one.

The Bill Wyman one is bonkers. Claimed he was open about it and asked the police etc if they wanted to talk to him and they said no.

Baffling stuff.

It's an interesting point, it's odd how severe cases in the past are being overlooked and then you see scenarios of people such as Aziz Ansari getting dragged into the #metoo spotlight.

we'llallhavetea

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

Em nope, he is a predator, he has clocked up quite a list over the years. Why does he have to be "close to the level of weinstein"? That really makes zero sense tbh, he's an asshole, he abused his position of power over many women. There's really no defending it unless you think he has done nothing wrong and in that case, I would advise you go get your head checked.
Also his 2017 stand up special was nowhere near as good as his other stuff, he's Not gonna be making a comeback imo

I think you're missing my point. I'm not claiming he didn't do anything wrong. He did. Perhaps I need to read into it more because you seem to think he did something a lot worse than what I believe.

What he did in comparison to others is important because they seem to be treated the same way at the moment. Neither are allowed work again. If these cases were brought to the court of law rather than the twitter mob, a sentence would be handed down based on their crimes. What I'm asking is how long is Louis CK's imaginary sentence? Should it be the same as Weinstein's? The answer is obviously no.

I just read this and its certainly grim reading. My point still stands though.

If I expose myself to a bunch of people, what sentence will I get? When will I get my life back? Should I get my life back?

Autecher

Deleted User wrote: »

Neither are allowed work again.

Louis is allowed to work, he is working, he is back doing standup again.

Autecher

And just on this latest controversy about the schoolkids routine. Am I the only one who doesn't think it was very offensive? I thought it was unfunny but most of that set was. Punching down has always been a part of his act even if he eased up a bit on it in recent years as he got more successful.

The Nal

cliggg wrote: »

And just on this latest controversy about the schoolkids routine. Am I the only one who doesn't think it was very offensive? I thought it was unfunny but most of that set was. Punching down has always been a part of his act even if he eased up a bit on it in recent years as he got more successful.

Its offensive if you're a joyless stain who lives through social media and whos life is mainly text and emojis, good or bad, right or wrong.

Hes always joked about college kids and people of that age being "nyeeeeehh". 20 year old giving out about having shítty jobs etc. Nothing new there. He used the words "retard" and "fagg0t" too which the sanctimonious up-their-own-hole self-righteous crowd seem to have missed.

Couple of very funny bits in there. Bit I laughed at most was the Jewish doctor/Ice cream bit.

we'llallhavetea

Deleted User wrote: »

I think you're missing my point. I'm not claiming he didn't do anything wrong. He did. Perhaps I need to read into it more because you seem to think he did something a lot worse than what I believe.

What he did in comparison to others is important because they seem to be treated the same way at the moment. Neither are allowed work again. If these cases were brought to the court of law rather than the twitter mob, a sentence would be handed down based on their crimes. What I'm asking is how long is Louis CK's imaginary sentence? Should it be the same as Weinstein's? The answer is obviously no.

I just read this and its certainly grim reading. My point still stands though.

If I expose myself to a bunch of people, what sentence will I get? When will I get my life back? Should I get my life back?

The big difference in you and Louis is that no one knows what you've done and your job is not in the entertainment business. His success depends on his popularity and people are allowed to be disgusted by him and not want to watch him anymore. You can't demand people like him just because you don't care what he did.

Silentcorner

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

The big difference in you and Louis is that no one knows what you've done and your job is not in the entertainment business. His success depends on his popularity and people are allowed to be disgusted by him and not want to watch him anymore. You can't demand people like him just because you don't care what he did.

And people are perfectly within their rights to like and pay to see him.

No one can demand that he disappear and rob him of his ability to earn a living.

Who gets to decide anything beyond that? The courts...the bedrock of our civilisation....these soviet style SJWs are a scourge.

This isn't even about Louis CK anymore...its about putting a stop to the brainless morons who have OD'd on outrage and spent too much time on twitter! And believe themselves to be the modern day version of the Soldiers of Christ!

we'llallhavetea

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

The big difference in you and Louis is that no one knows what you've done and your job is not in the entertainment business. His success depends on his popularity and people are allowed to be disgusted by him and not want to watch him anymore. You can't demand people like him just because you don't care what he did.

Putting words in my mouth. I never said I didn't care about what he did. I never demanded people like him. People are allowed to be disgusted by him. Those that are still disgusted by him can continue to avoid him whilst those that perhaps think he's served his time can go see him. It's the people that are outraged the most that seem to be dictating the terms.

My point is that what he did shouldn't be a life sentence.

we'llallhavetea

Silentcorner wrote: »

And people are perfectly within their rights to like and pay to see him.

No one can demand that he disappear and rob him of his ability to earn a living.

Who gets to decide anything beyond that? The courts...the bedrock of our civilisation....these soviet style SJWs are a scourge.

This isn't even about Louis CK anymore...its about putting a stop to the brainless morons who have OD'd on outrage and spent too much time on twitter! And believe themselves to be the modern day version of the Soldiers of Christ!

He's working? No one is stopping him.

we'llallhavetea

Deleted User wrote: »

Putting words in my mouth. I never said I didn't care about what he did. I never demanded people like him. People are allowed to be disgusted by him. Those that are still disgusted by him can continue to avoid him whilst those that perhaps think he's served his time can go see him. It's the people that are outraged the most that seem to be dictating the terms.

My point is that what he did shouldn't be a life sentence.

When you say life sentence, what are you on about? I mean, you just seem angry that people are upset with him. Dunno what you actually want to happen tbh!

Silentcorner

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

He's working? No one is stopping him.

So why are we discussing him!

we'llallhavetea

Silentcorner wrote: »

So why are we discussing him!

This is a thread on Louis ck...

we'llallhavetea

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

When you say life sentence, what are you on about? I mean, you just seem angry that people are upset with him. Dunno what you actually want to happen tbh!

Life sentence; as in the punishment should fit the crime. Tbh I'm glad to hear he's working again. What he did is abhorrent but there should a road to redemption.

I know in text it is hard to hear the tone but I'm not angry at all. I think you might be judging by your opening post

we'llallhavetea wrote: »

What the actual fcuk. Yeah louis is a great comedian, I really enjoy his comedy! He is also a total sexual predator. Get with it man, you can't whip your dick out and start tugging just because you asked AS YOU WERE PULLING YOUR DICK OUT.

Autecher

Deleted User wrote: »

It's the people that are outraged the most that seem to be dictating the terms.

My point is that what he did shouldn't be a life sentence.

Nobody is dictating terms, as I said in my previous post he is back working again, nobody is stopping him from doing that. Some people are upset about it but it's not preventing him from doing his job.

artvanderlay

Louis' new stuff is great. I've listened to the two bootlegs a few times already Glad to see him back on form. I'm actually glad too that his tv shows/movies have been cancelled: I found them so unfunny and pretentious. Louis is at his best on a stage with a mic in his hand (and not his cock :pac:)

Autecher

2 reviews of recent Louis shows, he seems to be talking more about his sex pest stuff so I'd say whenever he tours properly and does his next special he'll have a 10-15 minute routine about it ready to go.


https://www.timesunion.com/7day-breaking/article/Review-Louis-C-K-at-Funny-Bone-1-10-19-13524706.php


https://pagesix.com/2019/01/17/louis-c-k-continues-to-joke-about-sexual-harassment-and-parkland/

artvanderlay

“If you ever need people to forget that you jerked off, what you do is you make a joke about kids that got shot,” he told the packed house in San Jose.


Possibly Louis' greatest line ever! :pac: You have to, figuratively, admire his balls

s7ryf3925pivug

artvanderlay wrote: »

Louis' new stuff is great. I've listened to the two bootlegs a few times already Glad to see him back on form. I'm actually glad too that his tv shows/movies have been cancelled: I found them so unfunny and pretentious. Louis is at his best on a stage with a mic in his hand (and not his cock :pac:)

Only found one bootleg myself (the one linked in this thread). Funny alright. Do you have a link to the other? (I guess it would be ok to link from here since the other one is up without issue.)

artvanderlay

Keyla Sticky Pantyhose wrote: »

Only found one bootleg myself (the one linked in this thread). Funny alright. Do you have a link to the other? (I guess it would be ok to link from here since the other one is up without issue.)

I think the second one is gone off youtube now: I couldn't find it anyways. I did find this clip though

The Nal

Autecher

Louis announced 2 shows in a comedy club in Leeds next week but they got cancelled 1 day later due to the negative publicity. I previously disagreed with partyjungle over this kind of thing* but he/she was right. I don't agree with or like what Louis did but I find this to be ridiculous really.

EDIT: *"By this kind of thing" I mean I said Louis wasn't being stopped from working, whereas partyjungle (correctly) said he was.

https://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2019/05/15/43048/now_louis_ck_pulls_his_uk_gigs

The Nal

How long before hes allowed to work again?

Mike Tyson actually raped someone, never acknowledged it or apologised and everyone loves him.

Autecher

The Nal wrote: »

How long before hes allowed to work again?

Mike Tyson actually raped someone, never acknowledged it or apologised and everyone loves him.

I am more surprised that this happened outside of America, I thought if he ever got gigs cancelled like this it would be there but Leeds? I didn't expect that.