Came Across this use of Photoshop on youtube

keps

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ8OeRocLrk&feature=related

johnmcdnl

I wish i was that good using photoshop - but when you see that you just realise how fake 99% of fashion models shots actually are...

Thecageyone

The finished result looks like a doll, not a real person at all.

Mountainsandh

Agree with CageyOne, the end result is like a digital character, but it demonstrate what they can do. Hhhhhmmmm.... wonder if my paint.net would distort my shape that well ? :P

mehfesto

Looks like a white Whitney Houston, by the time they're done.

magicbastarder

just underlines that technical ability is not the same as aesthetic ability.

PoleStar

Personally I think it looks like a totally digitally created person, not a photo edit so I dont see what the big deal is, almost like a 3d manga woman!

baby and crumble

Kind of reminds me of a character from the sims or something...

AnimalRights

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10558258

http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/

K_user

I think the guy is just trying to prove a point.

By just using a still capture you can completely change a persons look, as long as you understand what you are doing.

magicbastarder

K_user wrote: »

I think the guy is just trying to prove a point.

By just using a still capture you can completely change a persons look, as long as you understand what you are doing.

i think if he set out to prove a point, he actually proved the opposite. yes, you can change a person's look, but the point surely would be to do it without making it look as if you had done it. on that criterium, he's failed.