16/17 yr old peak fertility age for women

wetling

So bone away guilt-free boys, natures urges you to, only our religious society tells you its wrong.

'lord jesus pray for my sins, I had sex with a fertile woman, its the same as having sex with a child isnt it, oh please forgive my sins lord'

DOC09UNAM

If we were in spain, they'd be legal 3-4 years by then, not that much of a biggy.

bluto63

Well no, it's actually 30, and even still it's about the mindset not being mature enough to deal with what they're doing.

wetling

bluto63 wrote: »

Well no, it's actually 30, and even still it's about the mindset not being mature enough to deal with what they're doing.

Lol, I think your confusing that with the age women become disgustingly desperate to have a baby as opposed to how fertile they are

Banned Account

DOC09UNAM wrote: »

not that much of a biggy.

It's refreshing that you're not too embarassed to admit it - it's all down to the technique with you right;)

ScumLord

bluto63 wrote: »

Well no, it's actually 30, and even still it's about the mindset not being mature enough to deal with what they're doing.

Women are most fertile at 30? Sounds odd when they would have possibly been dead by that age a few hundred years ago.

sealgaire

No I've heard that too. Men peak at 18 ish and women 30 ish

YFlyer

ScumLord wrote: »

Women are most fertile at 30? Sounds odd when they would have possibly been dead by that age a few hundred years ago.

Especially if they don't produce a son after a few goes.

up for anything

wetling wrote: »

So bone away guilt-free boys, natures urges you to, only our religious society tells you its wrong.

'lord jesus pray for my sins, I had sex with a fertile woman, its the same as having sex with a child isnt it, oh please forgive my sins lord'

You seem to have a bit of thing going for children. You're obviously a man of a certain age who is childless if you regard 'riding' mid-teen girls as an ok thing to do. :mad:

YFlyer

sealgaire wrote: »

No I've heard that too. Men peak at 18 ish and women 30 ish

Men last longer in their 30 ish

pickarooney

sealgaire wrote: »

No I've heard that too. Men peak at 18 ish and women 30 ish

You're confusing sexual peak/horniness with fertility.

Banned Account

up for somethings, but I draw the line sometimes wrote: »

You seem to have a bit of thing going for children. You're obviously a man of a certain age who is childless if you regard 'riding' mid-teen girls as an ok thing to do. :mad:

Fixed your username;)

wetling

up for anything wrote: »

You seem to have a bit of thing going for children. You're obviously a man of a certain age who is childless if you regard 'riding' mid-teen girls as an ok thing to do. :mad:

Ah yep, never too long before the moral police come to oppress us, u do know you can get married at 16 right? and the cheap trick of calling someone a peado

up for anything

Me the moral police - get a life! :rolleyes:

I didn't call someone a paedo, I implied that you have certain seedy tastes which you are doing your best to justify.

Does the fact that marriage at 16 is legal really make it right, and does it follow on from that that it is morally right for older gentlemen/ladies to have sex with 16 year olds?

up for anything

up for anything wrote: »

Me the moral police - get a life! :rolleyes:

I didn't call someone a paedo, I implied that you have certain seedy tastes which you are doing your best to justify.

Does the fact that marriage at 16 is legal really make it right, and does it follow on from that that it is morally right for older gentlemen/ladies to have sex with 16 year olds?

Why is it morally wrong? It's been done for millenia.. The human body tells us when were are ready to have sex, not religion.

DOC09UNAM

Deleted User wrote: »

Why is it morally wrong? It's been done for millenia.. The human body tells us when were are ready to have sex, not religion.

i could not agree more.

ScumLord

Deleted User wrote: »

Why is it morally wrong? It's been done for millenia.. The human body tells us when were are ready to have sex, not religion.

It's not as simple as that though is it? Part of our nature is to manage our reproduction, it has been for a long time. It's not just about if the individual is ready as it takes a community to raise a person.

up for anything

I am not saying it is morally wrong for teenagers to be sexually active with others of their own age group.

I am saying it is morally wrong for adults to regard teenagers as fair game.

midlandsmissus

pickarooney wrote: »

You're confusing sexual peak/horniness with fertility.

I have to say it's nuts - is this what it's like for teenage boys?

I've only reached 26, but I already notice such a difference in myself than before 25. I think about sex all the time, I look at men going down the street and think what they would be like in bed.
Even reading this thread has turned me on!!

Who knew this would happen ladies?!!!

pickarooney

midlandsmissus wrote: »

I have to say it's nuts - is this what it's like for teenage boys?

I've only reached 26, but I already notice such a difference in myself than before 25. I think about sex all the time, I look at men going down the street and think what they would be like in bed, I'm watching alot more porn,
Even reading this thread has turned me on!!

Who knew this would happen ladies?!!!

That's what it's like for pretty much all males aged 20-62. For teenage boys it's about six times worse (or better, if you're actually doing anything about it).

Celly Smunt

Deleted User wrote: »

Why is it morally wrong? It's been done for millenia.. The human body tells us when were are ready to have sex, not religion.

i'd have a baby by now and its not because of religion,just because those bastards cost money

Celly Smunt

midlandsmissus wrote: »

I have to say it's nuts - is this what it's like for teenage boys?

I've only reached 26, but I already notice such a difference in myself than before 25. I think about sex all the time, I look at men going down the street and think what they would be like in bed, I'm watching alot more porn,
Even reading this thread has turned me on!!

Who knew this would happen ladies?!!!

wanna grab a coke and make out?

bonerm

pmcmahon wrote: »

i'd have a baby by now and its not because of religion,just because those bastards cost money

Exactly. I don't see children as "little miracles". I see them as €100k investments.

Celly Smunt

bonerm wrote: »

Exactly. I don't see children as "little miracles". I see them as €100k investments.

which don't pay off,bad bad business move

biko

PM a mod with links as backup before this opens again
May not happen anyway, 16 is underage.