Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Psychoactive substances bill basically turns Garda into a tool of intimidation

  • 18-06-2010 4:58pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 121 ✭✭


    Just read through this new psychoactive bill. Apart from the fact that it competely violates loads of articles of the EU Fundamental Rights Chapter and apart from the potential threats to freedom of speech and press posed by this bill, I cannot escape fromt the impression that it is a bill which legitimises the use of police force as a tool of intimidation.
    Basically if a politician doesn't want a shop to exist they can let the Garda know and they then can , without a warrant, raid shops, offices, houses and cars of whomever they see fit.
    In short, if you are suspected of suspicious behaviour by our streetwise politicians you are done for.

    Hail the new police state


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    This is a democracy, if you don't like this you can vote for a politician that will repeal this legislation. In fact this has much greater support than almost anything else that FF have done.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭Eliot Rosewater


    ardmacha wrote: »
    This is a democracy, if you don't like this you can vote for a politician that will repeal this legislation. In fact this has much greater support than almost anything else that FF have done.

    So the majority get to have a free reign and basically walk over the civil liberties of any given minority? Doesn't sound fair to me. Martin Luther King didn't think so, too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭Prof.Badass


    Hey, now people can get prosecuted for "implying" something. Justice all round :rolleyes:.

    You have to wonder how much of this will stand up in court though. In a true free country these cases would be thrown out due to lack of evidence (how can you prove beyond all reasonable doubt that someone was implying the exact opposite of what they actually said :confused:).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,744 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    it would be fantastic if they end up banning alcohol - http://www.ehow.com/facts_5588807_alcohol-psychoactive-drug_.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,608 ✭✭✭✭sceptre


    Even by the standards of what we've let slide as a convenient outlet valve on this subject, the opening post here (read as "the state of it" at your whim) isn't going to be the genesis of a useful discussion at the standard required in this forum.

    /mod


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement