Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Rail chief's evidence to fraud probe panel at odds with affidavit

Comments

  • #2
    DWCommuter
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Hungerford wrote: »
    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/rail-chiefs-evidence-to-fraud-probe-panel-at-odds-with-affidavit-2194150.html


    It's quite an interesting issue, which could have major repurcussions if John Keenan's court case against IE went a certain way.

    And perhaps the tip of the iceberg. Hopefully they'll all sink.


  • #3
    schemingbohemia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    Is it really that surprising that 2 people on opposite sides in a court case would have different recollections of the same event?:rolleyes:


  • #4
    DWCommuter
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    schemingbohemia wrote: »
    Is it really that surprising that 2 people on opposite sides in a court case would have different recollections of the same event?:rolleyes:

    No, but when it concerns a heavily subsidised semi state company that has gone from happy go lucky spendalot to arrogant retrenchment, then its worth talking about.


  • #5
    schemingbohemia
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,606 ✭✭✭schemingbohemia


    But what possible light can be shed on this by anyone here? Before the case is decided upon.


  • #6
    DWCommuter
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    schemingbohemia wrote: »
    But what possible light can be shed on this by anyone here? Before the case is decided upon.

    Fun speculation.:D


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Victor
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    DWCommuter wrote: »
    Fun speculation.:D
    Not pointing at any one in particular, but seeing as this will be before a court, and there appears to be a conflict in the evidence, can people ground things in fact and not speculate too much?


  • #8
    DWCommuter
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Victor wrote: »
    Not pointing at any one in particular, but seeing as this will be before a court, and there appears to be a conflict in the evidence, can people ground things in fact and not speculate too much?

    Personally I will only speculate on what I know. One of the individuals resides in my region and locally, a lot is known, and many can't hold their piss. Its great!:D

    For the record I now have a qualification in media law so I know what can and can't be said.;)

    The simple reputations of IE managers is at stake, but the evidence and ultimate judgement will blow the roof off for sure.:D


Advertisement