Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Without Prejudice ?

  • 25-05-2010 1:14am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 5,451 ✭✭✭


    I think this question may have been asked before , but if so I cannot locate the thread.
    What does the phrase '' Without Prejudice '' actually mean ? Is it only applicable to correspondence between solicitors ?
    Is it correct that the contents of a letter carrying the words cannot be used in court for instance ?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 328 ✭✭eagle_&_bear


    hi there,

    I couldn't find anything in the search function.

    In general, any letter at all can be on a 'without prejudice' basis as long as the letter states ''without prejudice''.

    Surprisingly there is a number of cases on the legality of 'WP' and the jurisprudence states that the 'WP' must be on the page and it covers all words, figures, marks and thoughts directly under the 'WP'.

    Technically it does not cover what is written above the 'WP' line but, that really gives you no relief. The practical reality of a 'WP' letter is that the entire letter is out and can not be relied upon in Court, in any capacity.

    They are more commonly seen in contentious matters and moreso when matters around settlement or suggested courses of remedy are being discussed.

    In any event, the letters are also covered by legal privilege so they are never discoverable.


  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    Are you going to explain Calderbank letters and SI 12 of 2008? :)

    Admitted without prejudice letters are allowed be used in Court where privilege has been dropped but only very explicitly and in certain circumstances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 328 ✭✭eagle_&_bear


    who in their right mind would waive privilege?

    and when would you get both sides waiving it?


  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    who in their right mind would waive privilege?

    and when would you get both sides waiving it?

    Well interestingly it does happen when circumstances that have been subject to discussion on a without prejudice basis in advance of a trial become agreed and convenient to admit into evidence. It is rare enough, but can happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 328 ✭✭eagle_&_bear


    oh i was being flippant :P:eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Legal Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,338 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tom Young


    oh i was being flippant :P:eek:

    Really? ?? :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 328 ✭✭eagle_&_bear


    Tom Young wrote: »
    Really? ?? :eek:

    yup *head nodding like one of those nodding dogs that sit on the dashboard of a car*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,580 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    who in their right mind would waive privilege?
    Sometimes it might suit a party, e.g. if they wanted to demonstrate that they had sought to resolve the matter without recourse to the courts.
    and when would you get both sides waiving it?
    Surely only one party would need to waive the WP?


Advertisement