Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Soccer rankings 2010

  • 15-05-2010 5:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,602 ✭✭✭


    Here are my soccer rankings updated from last year. The only changes from last year are that United have cut Liverpool's lead from 28 points to 7 and Fulham have moved up 4 places to 45th.
    Here is the table.
    soccer Rankings.xls


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,477 ✭✭✭grenache


    patmac wrote: »
    Here are my soccer rankings updated from last year. The only changes from last year are that United have cut Liverpool's lead from 28 points to 7 and Fulham have moved up 4 places to 45th.
    Here is the table.
    soccer Rankings.xls
    Cant make head nor tail of that file, its a bit all over the place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,954 ✭✭✭✭CSF


    Meh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,014 ✭✭✭Eirebear


    Any chance of giving us an explanation of what it all is?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,280 ✭✭✭Bukman13


    Eirebear wrote: »
    Any chance of giving us an explanation of what it all is?

    Some extra info here-

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055219383

    and here-

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055579719


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,434 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Eirebear wrote: »
    Any chance of giving us an explanation of what it all is?

    Looks fairly self explanatory to me. He has awarded points for certain competitive achievements over a club's history in a weighted fashion, then reached an end total. Using his formula, you can rank the clubs in order of most successful.

    Whether this is a valuable way to compare clubs or not is obviously something that can be debated.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    How far back do these data go?

    Is a system helpful if it places, say, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday above Manchester City?

    Or Rochdale above Wigan?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,434 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    Neil3030 wrote: »
    How far back do these data go?

    Is a system helpful if it places, say, Leeds and Sheffield Wednesday above Manchester City?

    Or Rochdale above Wigan?

    I don't think the question of helpfulness comes into it tbh. It is surely interesting (and no more or less than that) to put a club like Man City into perspective. They are on the cusp of huge success, but have a distinct paucity of tradition when it comes to winning trophies relative to their current ambitions. A club's positioning in the football pyramid is impermanent and constantly evolving. People need to be reminded of that now more than ever imo...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,563 ✭✭✭kinaldo


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    I don't think the question of helpfulness comes into it tbh. It is surely interesting (and no more or less than that) to put a club like Man City into perspective. They are on the cusp of huge success, but have a distinct paucity of tradition when it comes to winning trophies relative to their current ambitions. A club's positioning in the football pyramid is impermanent and constantly evolving. People need to be reminded of that now more than ever imo...
    Except Real Madrid who will always be right at the top :)


Advertisement