Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

margaret ritchie cut out for politics?

  • 15-04-2010 11:46pm
    #1
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭


    "Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams is still angry with SDLP leader Margaret Ritchie following her refusal to discuss unity candidates in key constituencies.

    Mr Adams has offered to stand aside Sinn Féin hopeful Alex Maskey in South Belfast, to assist the chances of sitting MP Dr Alasdair McDonnell of the SDLP. In return Mr Adams would like high-profile SDLP newcomer and former UTV journalist Fearghal McKinney to give Sinn Féin’s Michelle Gildernew a clear run at defending her Fermanagh South Tyrone seat. She is facing a unity unionist candidate in Rodney Connor as both the Ulster Conservatives and Unionists New Force and the DUP have cleared the field for him."

    Is she a complete idiot or what? She is willing to allow the nationalist community to loose out on two seats so as not to appear sectarian. I wonder do the constituents in these areas feel the same?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,560 ✭✭✭✭dsmythy


    You get the politicians you deserve. If voters have an issue with this I suggest they don't vote for Ritchie.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    I think this decision will damage the SDLP in the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 656 ✭✭✭TOMASJ


    Nothing new here with the SDLP they have done this for years,

    Mid Ulster for example where they made sure Rev William McCrea held the seat for several elections,
    when they knew they had not a hope of winning this seat,
    eventually nationalist voters wised up to them, and voted for Martin McGuinness


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,311 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    paky wrote: »
    "Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams is still angry with SDLP leader Margaret Ritchie following her refusal to discuss unity candidates in key constituencies.

    Mr Adams has offered to stand aside Sinn Féin hopeful Alex Maskey in South Belfast, to assist the chances of sitting MP Dr Alasdair McDonnell of the SDLP. In return Mr Adams would like high-profile SDLP newcomer and former UTV journalist Fearghal McKinney to give Sinn Féin’s Michelle Gildernew a clear run at defending her Fermanagh South Tyrone seat. She is facing a unity unionist candidate in Rodney Connor as both the Ulster Conservatives and Unionists New Force and the DUP have cleared the field for him."

    Is she a complete idiot or what? She is willing to allow the nationalist community to loose out on two seats so as not to appear sectarian. I wonder do the constituents in these areas feel the same?

    Why does Michelle want the seat again? She never went to Westminster to represent her constituents. She should stand aside and let someone who will take up the seat have a go.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    paky wrote: »
    Is she a complete idiot or what? She is willing to allow the nationalist community to loose out on two seats so as not to appear sectarian. I wonder do the constituents in these areas feel the same?

    Maybe the SDLP not only want not to appear sectarian. Maybe they don't actually want to be sectarian.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    dvpower wrote: »
    Maybe the SDLP not only want not to appear sectarian. Maybe they don't actually want to be sectarian.

    Its inevitable in Northern Irish politics


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭PomBear


    dsmythy wrote: »
    You get the politicians you deserve. If voters have an issue with this I suggest they don't vote for Ritchie.

    Ritchie's the SDLP leader, she's not running in this constituency


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭PomBear


    paky wrote: »
    I think this decision will damage the SDLP in the future.

    Yeah, they've been in decline for a long time, they need SF to get any sort of say really


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭PomBear


    Why does Michelle want the seat again? She never went to Westminster to represent her constituents. She should stand aside and let someone who will take up the seat have a go.

    Because NI politics are different, a Unionist Seat means a Unionist MP working for Unionists and only Unionists


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭PomBear


    dvpower wrote: »
    Maybe the SDLP not only want not to appear sectarian. Maybe they don't actually want to be sectarian.

    they're not really a sectarian party, they are nationalists i.e. believe in a united Ireland so that makes them inevitably sectarian unintentionally


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 62 ✭✭FINGAL FAN


    I know NI has been a dysfunctional society but if any progress towards a normal society is to be achieved this sectarian headcount politics has to be left behind . The SDLP is a party in decline but possibly Ritchie is right on this issue . Unionists are not fielding an agreed candidate in South Belfast so the SDLP have a chance even with SF in the race.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭paky


    FINGAL FAN wrote: »
    I know NI has been a dysfunctional society but if any progress towards a normal society is to be achieved this sectarian headcount politics has to be left behind . The SDLP is a party in decline but possibly Ritchie is right on this issue . Unionists are not fielding an agreed candidate in South Belfast so the SDLP have a chance even with SF in the race.

    Behaving the way she is is not within the nature of politics


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    Shes dead right not to do a deal. The unionists making a pact spits in the face of everything the good friday agreement stands for.

    Much rather nationalists took the moral highground and not do a deal.
    I think both SDLP and Sinn Fein should pull out of F/ST in protest to be honest. Disappointed in Adams for approaching SDLP on this issue


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    PomBear wrote: »
    they're not really a sectarian party, they are nationalists i.e. believe in a united Ireland so that makes them inevitably sectarian unintentionally

    Thats a pretty narrow definition of sectarianism tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭PomBear


    dvpower wrote: »
    Thats a pretty narrow definition of sectarianism tbh.

    Sectarianism refers to religion
    Nationalism doesn't


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    Alex Maskey of Sinn Fein has pulled out of South Belfast. Did it a few minutes before the deadline so was obviously strategic and didn't want to give SDLP a chance to respond.

    I'm guessing they knew SDLP wouldn't back down, know they won't win in South Belfast, so when the unionist gerrymandering new force wins in Fermanagh/South Tyrone they make the SDLP look liek the bad guys.


Advertisement