Britney Spears Releases Un-Airbrushed Images

Resi12 · 13-04-2010 7:03pm #1

Before Photo 1: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/13/article-1265676-091E1323000005DC-211_306x592.jpg

After Photo 1: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/13/article-1265676-091E12F1000005DC-182_306x592.jpg

Before Photo 2: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/13/article-1265676-091E1255000005DC-214_306x833.jpg

After Photo 2: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/13/article-1265676-091E1293000005DC-285_306x833.jpg

So what does everybody think? I for one am glad to see her actually take some control and show that she is not as perfect as she is made to look in these photo shoots.

bazmaiden · 13-04-2010 7:04pm

still would

PeterIanStaker · 13-04-2010 7:06pm

I would prefer the un - airbrushed ones over the airbrushed anytime.

Pace2008 · 13-04-2010 7:07pm

Don't care; have never cared about anything less.

bonerm · 13-04-2010 7:09pm

The second pix forgot to point out "cameltoe removed".

karlm37 · 13-04-2010 7:14pm

Daily Mail, where would we be without you? I can now die a happy man, knowing that Britney Spears's thighs and hips are marginally wider the world was led to believe...

orourkeda · 13-04-2010 7:16pm

I'd finger her.

Prof.Badass · 13-04-2010 7:17pm

PeterIanStaker wrote: »

I would prefer the un - airbrushed ones over the airbrushed anytime.

But you're a man. Believe it or not these images aren't designed to appeal to men, they're desinged to appeal to women :eek:. The women idolised in fashion magazines (and simmilar industries) are all more masculine looking than the standard women. Tall, skinny, long legs.....all masculine features.

Also, women dress up to show off to other women, not men. High heels, showy dress, heavy makeup, manicured nails, perfectly styled/dyed hair...not reallly things men look for (i mean wtf sort of man cares if a woman has a designer handbag?).

:eek:.

My name is URL · 13-04-2010 7:18pm

She's gone downhill since she became legal

http://www.glamour.com/images/fashion/2008/11/1124-hit-me-baby-one-more-time-video-britney-spears_li.jpg

Lemsiper · 13-04-2010 7:22pm

I have fingered her.

gagiteebo · 13-04-2010 7:25pm

vinylmesh wrote: »

Also, women dress up to show off to other women, not men.

You've hit the nail on the head! I honestly don't think men see even half of what we beat ourselves up about and if they do see it they don't care as much as we think

Zillah · 13-04-2010 7:26pm

PeterIanStaker wrote: »

I would prefer the un - airbrushed ones over the airbrushed anytime.

Ahahaha, not really though? She looks way better in the photoshopped version. There's a reason they airbrush photos.

GLaDOS · 13-04-2010 7:29pm

vinylmesh wrote: »

Also, women dress up to show off to other women, not men.

If there's cleavage/short skirt everything else pretty much gets ignored

heffomike54 · 13-04-2010 7:34pm

I would have to be dug out of her,airbrushed or not!!

BraziliaNZ · 13-04-2010 7:35pm

Regardless, betcha none of us are banging a chick as hot as her, airbrushed or not

GLaDOS · 13-04-2010 7:36pm

BraziliaNZ wrote: »

Regardless, betcha none of us are banging a chick as hot as her, airbrushed or not

You underestimate my photoshopping skills

admiralofthefleet · 13-04-2010 7:36pm

PeterIanStaker wrote: »

I would prefer the un - airbrushed ones over the airbrushed anytime.

likewise, she would put a horn on a corpse

Archeron · 13-04-2010 7:39pm

Is the idea of a non-airburshed and airbrushed version at the same time in a threesome something that could happen in this reality?

ejmaztec · 13-04-2010 7:43pm

ScienceNerd wrote: »

If there's cleavage/short skirt everything else pretty much gets ignored

Even if it's Mary Harney?:eek:

GLaDOS · 13-04-2010 7:45pm

ejmaztec wrote: »

Even if it's Mary Harney?:eek:

Well in her case it's cleavage of fat, which draws the attention, but not in a good way

cafecolour · 13-04-2010 7:47pm

Wait, Britney Spears is almost 30? The world just keeps conspiring to make me feel old!

Als76 · 13-04-2010 7:49pm

Un-airbrushed looks better more natural

rubadub · 13-04-2010 7:51pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3U2u1IC78U

Robin Wren · 13-04-2010 7:53pm

My name is URL wrote: »

She's gone downhill since she became legal

http://www.glamour.com/images/fashion/2008/11/1124-hit-me-baby-one-more-time-video-britney-spears_li.jpg

Lol, thankfully she was, definitely at the height of her powers then.

Soul Cake Duck · 13-04-2010 8:01pm

Britney's come back take...what are we on now? Not that it isn't a good message she is sending, so I guess fair fook to her for doing it.

Overheal · 13-04-2010 8:26pm

Good for her. This female image thing is way outta hand.

ejmaztec · 13-04-2010 8:32pm

If Lady Gaga were "un-airbrushed" she would probably be Hulk Hogan.

Dean820 · 13-04-2010 8:35pm

Big difference in the second lot of pics.

Michellenman · 13-04-2010 8:36pm

Als76 wrote: »

Un-airbrushed looks better more natural

Shocker!!:eek:

xzanti · 13-04-2010 8:55pm

Should have airbrushed some decent shoes onto her..

Stench Blossoms · 13-04-2010 9:02pm

Fair play to her. Obviously a bit of a publicity stunt but still good that she's showing that she's not perfect.

Reminds me of this Dove ad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2gD80jv5ZQ

xxchloexx · 13-04-2010 9:05pm

I think shes looking great , She has a fab figure , wouldn mind having her body

admiralofthefleet · 13-04-2010 9:06pm

id suck her farts

bonerm · 13-04-2010 9:07pm

orla wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2gD80jv5ZQ

If anything that ad only further confirms to me that all these images are created for women to look at (not men). IMHO the models appearance right at when she sat down was preferable to the final result after all the "improvement".

I was expecting them to make something amazing out of her but she just looked like some CG creature from Avatar 2 : Trouble on Planet Protitutus by the time it was done. :rolleyes:

Zombienosh · 13-04-2010 9:13pm

xzanti wrote: »

Should have airbrushed some decent shoes onto her..

point proved.

ChocolateSauce · 13-04-2010 9:18pm

Please don't link to the daily mail again!

parker kent · 13-04-2010 9:21pm

Zillah wrote: »

Ahahaha, not really though? She looks way better in the photoshopped version. There's a reason they airbrush photos.

Yes really! In the non-airbrushed she actually looks as if she has a human figure, not like she is a one dimensional drawing. Had a talk about the Dove ad with some of the girls in college, the gap between what some men and women think about beauty is mad sometimes.

PeterIanStaker · 13-04-2010 11:26pm

Zillah wrote: »

Ahahaha, not really though? She looks way better in the photoshopped version. There's a reason they airbrush photos.

Yes, really.

And the reason ( and I know nothing because I am a straight Irish male in my late 20's) they airbrush photos is to play on women's insecurities and make them their own worst enemy.

Its not about looking good to attract men, its about competing with each other to see who looks like some distorted version of reality marketed to them by money - hungry companies.

So, in conclusion, I would f*ck the non - airbrushed one. A lot.

Overheal · 13-04-2010 11:40pm

I hope more people do this.

Glamor Mags and all that have some pretty sick underlying truths about them. Girls grow up thinking they aren't good enough. It leads them to depression, and many many worse things.

Its important for these girls to see their Role Models 'in the flesh' - bruises and wrinkles and all. Theres a lot of honesty in those bum cheeks, too.