Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Galway Harbour redevelopment final plan video

  • 12-03-2010 11:18am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 163 ✭✭


    Galway Harbour redevelopment final plan

    The video is a bit "begorra begorra" but very impressive nonetheless

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbQufFAXy1U


«1

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Not the daftest plan I have ever seen cooked up, the presentation is a bit short on facts .....sort of build it and they will come.

    Mind you phase one (2015) should prove the theory one way or another so they may as well try that much of it and see.

    The harbour company did not mention what they will do with the tankers when they finish the first bit in 2015

    [edit they did in a pdf brochure......ie nothing until phase 1 stage 2]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,209 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    Sponge - This is a video to show your average Joe. I can assure you that the Galway Harbour Company (and other interests) have all the facts etc. needed


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Tell us what are they doing to do about the constant reek of oil all over the town between now and 2020 when they build the new tanks John ???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭fifib


    pretty impressive. pity wont be there for the next VOR, or least some of it


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    None of it will be there for the next VOR.

    The first phase will attract attention from all sorts of Green nutjobs who will be making lots of noise right about the time of the VOR unless the planning applications are held over to late 2012. The battle with the Green nutjobs will be fought over the first phase, in essence, the remaining phases will be insignificant.

    I dunno if anyone noticed that this development is being build in a SAC and in an SPA ....as in both. The outer bypass only clipped a SAC ( and an NHA) where this

    Hopefully the corpo will go for an upgrade of the nearly maxed out Mutton Island sewage plant at the same time and will distract the Green nutjobs and An Taisce, eh John ??

    You do remember all the squealing about Mutton Island phase 1 10 years back. The best way to get this large project under the radar is to spread a rumour that Mutton Island IS maxed out and about to BURSHT but that An Taisce officially won't let anyone upgrade it until it actually burshts.

    That is probably the truth anyway, An Taisce in Galway would object to their own shadows :(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭citycentre


    I have major worries about the visual impact of this development and I feel it could really adversely affect the relationship of the city to the bay, Instead of looking out from say South Park or Dun Aengus at sea, sky and the hills on the horizon the view will be of concrete breakwaters, containers and all the associated mess that ports and harbours contain (scrapheaps etc).

    It's a worry, however I think that the benefits may outweigh the negatives if (and only if) the scheme is very well designed, landscaped and suitable development is allowed along the new shoreline to provide high quality amenity space and a proper promenade with shops, cafes etc. The last thing we want is basically Galway Harbour Enterprise x 10 stretching out into the bay with nothing but tin sheds to look at.

    Unfortunately from the video it looks like quality design is not high on the priorities of the harbour company - the graphics, visuals and the small number of 3D images of what the scheme will look like are very amateurish. Hopefully it's only a first draft because we could easily be landed with a complete eyesore if proper consideration isn't given to the aesthetics of this enormous project.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    I note at 6:22 that the Athenry-Tuam leg of the Western Rail Corridor is to open in 2011. Good luck with that one lads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,209 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Tell us what are they doing to do about the constant reek of oil all over the town between now and 2020 when they build the new tanks John ???
    1156616251wm3K26.jpg for all! :pac:
    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    You do remember all the squealing about Mutton Island phase 1 10 years back. The best way to get this large project under the radar is to spread a rumour that Mutton Island IS maxed out and about to BURSHT but that An Taisce officially won't let anyone upgrade it until it actually burshts.

    That is probably the truth anyway, An Taisce in Galway would object to their own shadows :(

    All too well.

    And I agree, An Taisce are a royal pain in the hole


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    The first phase, while long, should be pretty low profile. The tin boxes and tanks arrive much later on ( if ever). It cannot not wash its face financially without the tin boxes and tanks. Fixing the oily stink from the existing tanks would engender some goodwill John , non????

    The long term pitch about transatlantic container traffic is, frankly, utterly risible. Not even worthy of discussion and will not happen.

    Phase 1 stage 1 would be a modern nimmos pier on the far side of the river from the original but phase 1 stage 1 will not proceed absent permission for phase 1 stage 2 too.

    Mind you An Taisce and the Green nutjobs in Galway will misrepresent it as a full size space terminal with green aliens living on it devouring taytos and babies.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    JohnCleary wrote: »
    And I agree, An Taisce are a royal pain in the hole
    An Taisce as a whole may be objectionable goons but their localised dissident splinter groups are worse.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 739 ✭✭✭flynnlives


    This plan should be fast tracked and work should begin immediatly imo.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Then when everybody ignores Galway An Taisce for being the noisy smelly socially dysfunctional lettuce shredding loons they are they bring in complete and utter loonies like Peter Sweetman to object some more for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,209 ✭✭✭✭JohnCleary


    "Oily stink" - My nose must be blocked cause I can't get any oily stink? Maybe i'm just used to it


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    JohnCleary wrote: »
    "Oily stink" - My nose must be blocked cause I can't get any oily stink? Maybe i'm just used to it

    For the last two years since the new tanks were commissioned there has been a strong oily smell about Galway a lot of the time....a hell of a lot of the time in fact :( When will that be sorted???? Someone is evidently venting it off.

    Shall we send Bolphunga the Unrelenting down to the next An Taisce meeting to raise a point of order :cool:

    505px-Bolphunga_01.JPG


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭death1234567


    flynnlives wrote: »
    This plan should be fast tracked and work should begin immediatly imo.
    Yep, It won't be though. They'll be arguing and having planning appeals until 2030 until the whole thing is scrapped in favour of a redevelopemnt of Eyre square which will involve digging up old trees and replacing them with shiny new ones.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭Sconsey


    I'm inclined to agree with BTH, it looks like it could be a great development but why not actually put some investigation into the impact of the development first.

    SpongeBob you seem to care so much about this why don't you actually get involved instead of spending your time pi$$ing and moaning on an internet forum and calling people names? It gets old, have you actually done anything real about all the development you are in favor of?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Sconsey wrote: »
    SpongeBob you seem to care so much about this why don't you actually get involved instead of spending your time pi$$ing and moaning on an internet forum and calling people names? It gets old, have you actually done anything real about all the development you are in favor of?

    Still a bit touchy about my pointing out that Pearce Stadium predates all these 'local residents' who spend their time "pi$$ing and moaning" about it as you so eloquently put it. Get over that sconsey, it is a fact.

    What are you recommending I get "involved" in o wise one, spell it out there like a good lad ?????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,675 ✭✭✭ronnie3585


    Sconsey wrote: »
    I'm inclined to agree with BTH, it looks like it could be a great development but why not actually put some investigation into the impact of the development first.

    SpongeBob you seem to care so much about this why don't you actually get involved instead of spending your time pi$$ing and moaning on an internet forum and calling people names? It gets old, have you actually done anything real about all the development you are in favor of?

    Mr. Sweetman, is that you objecting to SpongeBob objecting?

    There can be all the best intentions and shiny models in the world but the reality of the situation is that it will be a hell of a long time (if ever) before there are sufficient funds to develop this kind of infrastructure.

    Pity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,563 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    JohnCleary wrote: »
    "Oily stink" - My nose must be blocked cause I can't get any oily stink? Maybe i'm just used to it

    Yeah must say I can't smell it either. Must be my deodorant.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 10,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Robbo


    Yeah must say I can't smell it either. Must be my deodorant.
    I quite often get a fierce bang of bitumen from the place.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭Sconsey


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Still a bit touchy about my pointing out that Pearce Stadium predates all these 'local residents' who spend their time "pi$$ing and moaning" about it as you so eloquently put it. Get over that sconsey, it is a fact.

    What are you recommending I get "involved" in o wise one, spell it out there like a good lad ?????

    Well Sponge you include name calling like 'Green nutjobs' in your posts, do you actually think that will put the Greens in their box? no need for you to actually make representations to you local TD's, or maybe write to an Taisce with your opinions on the development, or maybe even contact the Greens with a coherent argument and ask them to respond...no, you just whine on an internet forum and throw insults around.

    Kind of funny to me that you are complaining about an oil smell in town from the tanks, maybe if a bit more thought/planning went into their development the stink around town could have been avoided...you'd probably have called people nutjobs if they raised this concern prior to the development :p


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    It is a sad but true fact that Galway is the West of Ireland hub of what passes for the farce that is the Green Economy.

    A large number of specialists live in the city , constantly on the hunt for consultancy eco/bio/habitat gigs. These are tied in with infrastructural developments.

    When these greeen/eco/bio/habitat types do not get their noses in the consultancy trough they kick up an absolute furore through an taisce and those splinter groups mentioned.

    It is basically a form of legal extortion. Welcome To The Green Economy.

    The harbour board will spend somewhere between €500k and €1m on these green economy parasites before a single speck of sand is dredged. If they never proceed with this plan then that money will be wasted but it will assuredly be spent.

    Yet they have no choice but to spend the money and it will take 2 - 3 years to finish all that consultancyfest and plannin after which the first phase of constriction itself will only take about 2 summers....construction will probably be restricted in winter in case a duck is hurt!!!!

    They will have to hire transport planners to update the GTPS

    They will have to get up to speed on our Mediterranean Salt Meadows ... that is in Galway yes.

    They will have to study the overall Hydrological Impact on the Lamprey if there is any change to basal turbidity in the study zone.

    They will have to investigate each of these birds , its nesting , numbers and migratory habits. It will have to 'mitigate' any impact on any of them from its plans.

    Proposed Special Conservation Interests/Additional Special Conservation Interests
    Black-throated diver
    Shelduck
    Great northern diver
    Wigeon
    Cormorant
    Teal
    Grey Heron
    Shoveler
    Light-bellied brent goose
    Golden plover
    Red-brested merganser
    Lapwing
    Ringed plover
    Dunlin
    Bar-tailed godwit
    Curlew
    Turnstone
    Redshank
    Sandwich tern
    Black-headed gull
    Common tern
    Common gull

    They will have to balance their EIS out against the SEA and the HDA and the City Development plan.

    Once they do all that ....and much more...they are then ready to apply for planning permission and face the loons.

    The very best of luck to them. They will need it.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Sconsey wrote: »
    Well Sponge you include name calling like 'Green nutjobs' in your posts, do you actually think that will put the Greens in their box? no need for you to actually make representations to you local TD's, or maybe write to an Taisce with your opinions on the development, or maybe even contact the Greens with a coherent argument and ask them to respond...no, you just whine on an internet forum and throw insults around.

    Sconsey , if I was in the habit of talking to ****e that sticks to my shoe you would accuse me of being mad. I am not mad I assure you :)

    The draft City Development plan has badly hamstrung the harbour plan too.

    It attaches a large number of preconditions that inevitably mean the green economy needs to be well greased before any planning application.

    http://www.galwaycity.ie/AllServices/Planning/Publications
    /DraftDevelopmentPlan2011-2017Publications/TheFile,6461,en.pdf

    "Support the sustainable development of Galway Harbour including for new and expanded harbour facilities, subject to environmental, visual,
    economic viability and transportation considerations."


    Even having done all that the loons will be out howling about it :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭Sconsey


    Well to be honest now you seem to be on the complete opposite side of the spectrum, I'd be worried the country would be just paved over and feck the consequences if you were in charge!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    Sconsey wrote: »
    Well to be honest now you seem to be on the complete opposite side of the spectrum, I'd be worried the country would be just paved over and feck the consequences if you were in charge!

    I'm not Sconsey, I am just a ruthlessly pragmatic person. Any real objection I have to this plan is economic....I basically agree with what Ronnie said above.

    The economic case is that having eventually dredged and built and created 40 odd acres of new landfill the land value becomes embedded in and key to the overall balancing of the books.

    I cannot see what value this 40 acres of landfill will have in the harbour.

    The end of the current and rather tatty harbour industrial park is an abandoned builders yard used by bernard mcnamara who is off to NAMA any day now.

    Absent economic support for that imputed value the numbers do not stack for me. And then they will be down €1m in bribes to grease the Green Economy to cap all that :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭citycentre


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    The draft City Development plan has badly hamstrung the harbour plan too.

    It attaches a large number of preconditions that inevitably mean the green economy needs to be well greased before any planning application.

    http://www.galwaycity.ie/AllServices/Planning/Publications
    /DraftDevelopmentPlan2011-2017Publications/TheFile,6461,en.pdf

    "Support the sustainable development of Galway Harbour including for new and expanded harbour facilities, subject to environmental, visual,
    economic viability and transportation considerations."


    Even having done all that the loons will be out howling about it :(

    In fairness Sponge Bob, you don't really think that something of this scale which will completely transform the city one way or another, should be allowed to just fire ahead WITHOUT taking those factors into consideration do you?

    I am all for the continued development of Galway and like you get extremely frustrated when the serial objectors and environ-MENTALISTS get involved in objecting to and derailing sometimes exciting and often essential projects. However I honestly don't think that something this big should be left in the hands of an some engineer who has just gotten the hang of SketchUP and Windows Movie Maker to design and push forward.

    From what little I have seen the logistics and purely practical element of this scheme seem to have been well resolved but I see no evidence of much regard for the environmental (not that I personally could care less about birds or Salt Meadows or the Lamprey) or most worryingly the visual effect the proposal will have.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    This scheme has been around in one form or another for 5 years and it was launched this time last year for the VOR before being relaunched this week with a few small mods....the marina has been brought forward.

    see

    http://buckplanning.blogspot.com/2009/02/350m-plan-for-new-galway-harbour.html

    €350m Plan ...€200m now :)

    For all I know the enviro stuff has been underway for years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    I want it, but with more guns.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,815 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    Can't we just shoot the serial objectors?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭swe_fi


    I wish that people who develop this city were a little bit more...eh...mental. I mean in the "that-was-a-nice-semiprofessional-powerpoint-ehhhvideoImean-this-could-be-alot-of-fun-lets-have-a-quick-vote-actually-screw-that go-ahead-and-build-build-build" kind of way. I would actually like to see diggers there tonight.

    I think this will happen though, more or less like the video. I can feel it. It will be like Sydney. Actually can we throw in a nice bridge, doesn't really matter to where but I like bridges.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42 christg


    I'd be curious to see what would happen to BallyLoughan beach with this developement. It could cause the beach to fill in all the way to the city. And that could be brilliant. I would also be interested in what would happen to Lough Atalia, its stagnent already - it will be much more so with a longer opening. Maybe they should just fill it in ? (thats sort of being sarcastic - but would be interested in others opinions)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,815 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    christg wrote: »
    I'd be curious to see what would happen to BallyLoughan beach with this developement. It could cause the beach to fill in all the way to the city. And that could be brilliant. I would also be interested in what would happen to Lough Atalia, its stagnent already - it will be much more so with a longer opening. Maybe they should just fill it in ? (thats sort of being sarcastic - but would be interested in others opinions)

    Apparently some plan from the 60's suggested it be filled in for housing, perhaps that should be suggested again just to give the serial objectors something else to consentrate on.:pac::pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,295 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    I've just got around to watching this now.

    Seems to me that it's very light on details of how the road links to/from the area will work: I can see a double-tracked railway line, with a truck driving beside it, but how does that truck get to/from the motorway links that they're boasting about? Seems to me that all the options involve places that we don't necessarily want trucks going thru. (And I certainly don't believe that Galway would have enough freight to justify a rail-fed "inland harbour" concept)

    Also, all those nice graphics of people walking about human-friendly streets: it's quite a hike from the city centre down to the current harbour enterprise park, and this will be even further way. Somehow I'm just finding it hard to imagine it as such a pleasant walk.

    (All that said, I do support the idea: just want more details sorted.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 158 ✭✭cianof


    Looks like a progressive and exciting plan.

    The road access issue is still present however.

    Traffic is quite bad along the docks at rush hour.

    Maybe if they get the bypass sorted it will work out.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    A 'deal' to sell some €26m of land to start this project off fell through.

    http://www.galwaynews.ie/15099-port-plans-are-scaled-back-%E2%82%AC26m-land-deal-falls-through
    Galway Harbour Company is planning to self-finance the ambitious redevelopment of the docks through the sale of land and will not receive any government funding for the project.
    It announced yesterday morning that it had “scaled back” its proposal for the redevelopment of Galway harbour “to take account of the current economic climate”.
    The project will now be undertaken in four phases instead of two and is not expected to be completed for seven years. Galway Harbour Company is currently engaged with An Bord Pleanála in revising its planning submission in relation to the project.

    The Harbour Company have released a PR that says.
    The new Phase 1 will allow the construction of a sheltered quay of 660metres and make provision for a turning circle for some of the worlds largest cruise liners and tankers.

    This phase will allow the Port to sustain and grow its current core business and is essential to the current operating needs of the Port. It is estimated that the cost of achieving Phase 1 will be circa €50m and will be funded by the Galway Harbour Company.

    Phases 2 & 3 will allow the provision of a rail link to accommodate rail freight and the construction of a quay for the inshore fishing fleet.

    Phase four makes provision for the development of a western marina that will be capable of berthing 216 leisure craft.

    Completion of all four phases is estimated for 2017 and will future proof the maritime requirements of the Port of Galway.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    There is a new Vid of the revised plan. Well done piece of video. Only thing missng is the crushtie and an taisce protest camp with smoke billowing about 24/7 and feck the environment :)

    Original Video of Plan March 2010




    Video of Revised Plan September 2010



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,193 ✭✭✭Wompa1


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    There is a new Vid of the revised plan. Well done piece of video. Only thing missng is the crushtie and an taisce protest camp with smoke billowing about 24/7 and feck the environment :)

    Original Video of Plan March 2010




    Video of Revised Plan September 2010


    I think this should start ASAP. It will create alot of jobs most importantly! It will make Galway stand out that much more to the rest of Ireland. The Cruise Liners will bring in quite a bit of tourism.

    The roads would be a concern but I'm not sure that's necessarily an issue with that side of the city. I would imagine alot of the traffic heading that way is going out Salthill, Knocknacarra way. The Traffic going out from town is most likely going out Dublin Road. I'm not too up on the projected impact of the Bypass but would this alleviate some of the traffic?

    You never know maybe the positive impact in the way of tourism would cop them on and get the public transport system off it's knees and in proper order...maybe then that could help ease the traffic.

    I say do it!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,352 ✭✭✭plonk


    In the latest video they haven't moved the petroleum tanks out to the end of the harbour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,815 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    Would love to see cruise liners visit the city. Hopefullt this developement will get off the ground asap.:cool:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    The planning process for this project has been taken over from the Corpo by An Bord Pleanála

    http://www.galwaynews.ie/15693-plans-progressing-new-harbour-city
    An Bord Pleanála has decided that the proposed development, by Galway Harbour Company, should be classed as Strategic Infrastructure Development.

    Now that An Bord Pleanála has decided the proposal for Galway Harbour falls within this category, all documentation relating to the plans can go on public display.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    This scheme has been around in one form or another for 5 years

    There have been demands for the expansion of Galway port to transatlantic traffic for at least 98 years now. :) I'm not for or against the proposals but I wouldn't hold my breath either way.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    There have been demands for the expansion of Galway port to transatlantic traffic for at least 98 years now. :)

    Hate to be pedantic there Brian but those particular demands you are referring to were made over 98 years ago and then a combination of the Lusitania and the Mayo Mafia put an end to them.....and that those early plans were for passengers and mail and not containers and fuel and leisure craft as now :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Hate to be pedantic there Brian but those particular demands you are referring to were made over 98 years ago and then a combination of the Lusitania and the Mayo Mafia put an end to them.....and that those early plans were for passengers and mail and not containers and fuel and leisure craft as now :cool:

    That's not what the 1912 articles say. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    That's not what the 1912 articles say. :D

    Dude, if you read a series of questions I set here on Boards and then read the answers to those questions which are here ( with helpful supporting links to the answers ) then you may change your mind.

    It was over in 1912, frankly it was over when the Mauretania won the Blue Riband in 1907, all that remained was the 'Imperial' element :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    Sponge Bob wrote: »

    It was over in 1912

    There was still much campaigning to open the red route via Galway in 1912, which is what I was referring to.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    But no momentum Brian. It has some momentum in the 1890s and maybe up to 1905 or so.

    You may also have noted my observation in that other thread that the contents of a full atlantic class container ship, if decanted to a single train, would reach past Ballinasloe.

    I must tell Peter Sweetman about that :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    My point wasn't whether it was viable in 1912, just that people have been calling for this development for at least 100 years. Its arguably much less needed now than it was then, and it was definitely less needed then than it was 20 or 30 years previous to that.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    As far back as the 1850s, in fact the idea had the most traction either side of 1860 ...if you will read here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    That could be handy for my thesis thanks. :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    If you are researching it I thoroughly recommend the online and searchable ( and damned fast) NZ news archive HERE

    The NZers were promised a 20 ish day journey to or from London if the west of Ireland route came off and followed developments agog. Then you have dates and times of key announcements and can search our Irish/UK news archives which are on Microfiche..and unindexed of course ..around the same times. Maybe the UK ones are indexed but practise on the NZ archive to get key names and dates.

    This idea became known from the 1890s as the Imperial Line or the Red Route ( the empire was all red on maps) and the All Red Route. Also search for Galway and Halifax and Blacksod in there.

    The idea died upon the outbreak of WW1 when they were just about to start work in Blacksod as I recall. It was resurrected as the Imperial Airships project in 1918 and when they displayed a tendency to explode this mutated to Imperial Airways and into the British Overseas Aviation Corporation one or three wars and no empire later.

    search this for "red route" too

    You will further enjoy the "Lecture delivered at the Imperial Institute, on the 17th February, 1896 on the new British route to the Pacific" by Col Josiah Harris. He advocated a variant further north and nearer the famous North West Passage sailing route...that by then discarded given all the trouble the worlds greatest seafarers had with pack ice....and to avoid them Fenian laddies lurking along the American Canadian border.

    The "Colonial Conference of 1907" was important too, sort of a Lisbon Treaty of empire that.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement