Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

solar panel rip-off?

  • 02-03-2010 4:03am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2


    Those who hate environmentalism have spent years looking for the definitive example of a great green rip-off. Finally it arrives, and nobody notices. The government is about to shift £8.6bn from the poor to the middle classes. It expects a loss on this scheme of £8.2bn, or 95%. Yet the media is silent. The opposition urges only that the scam should be expanded.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/mar/01/solar-panel-feed-in-tariff


Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 6,376 Mod ✭✭✭✭Macha


    OP, please state your opinion and don't simply quote the first paragraph of the article.

    Also, this is an Irish forum, not an English one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,537 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    This is a good initiative and will ultimately push the research and efficiency of micro generation upwards. IMO in the next 10-15 years every house should have its own PV solar system, once systems improve to a certain point you'd be mad not to, (even in Ireland:rolleyes:).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 90 ✭✭YourSQL


    maybe they shouldnt bother with high feed in tarrifs and just give grants for the solar panels.

    feed in tariff is only 9c over here, but i suppose that is only if you produce more than you use.

    I'd go off the grid if i could, and run most things off 12v directly. grid-tie inverters + feeding back into the grid incurs a substatial loss.

    if there were some good 30Wh/Kg ultracapacitors that i could actually buy in ireland rather than importing from some obscure location it would hardly be worth staying on the grid. solar panels are far from a rip off now, grid parity will be reached here soon if it isn't already

    of course the biggest rip off is when you don't install this stuff yourself. the company installing them effectively pockets the grant and the government is supporting this sort of carry on with mandating 'professional installation' - in most cases just a bunch of cowboys who just want to get the job done as fast as possible and collect the cash


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    YourSQL wrote: »
    feed in tariff is only 9c over here, but i suppose that is only if you produce more than you use.

    I'd go off the grid if i could, and run most things off 12v directly. grid-tie inverters + feeding back into the grid incurs a substatial loss.

    The feed in tariff is 19c for the first 3,000 units exported at present, 9c thereafter.

    Grid tie inverters are a lot more efficient than batteries. Modern inverters are 94% efficient.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 191 ✭✭Mozart1986


    YourSQL wrote: »
    maybe they shouldnt bother with high feed in tarrifs and just give grants for the solar panels.

    feed in tariff is only 9c over here, but i suppose that is only if you produce more than you use.

    I'd go off the grid if i could, and run most things off 12v directly. grid-tie inverters + feeding back into the grid incurs a substatial loss.

    if there were some good 30Wh/Kg ultracapacitors that i could actually buy in ireland rather than importing from some obscure location it would hardly be worth staying on the grid. solar panels are far from a rip off now, grid parity will be reached here soon if it isn't already

    of course the biggest rip off is when you don't install this stuff yourself. the company installing them effectively pockets the grant and the government is supporting this sort of carry on with mandating 'professional installation' - in most cases just a bunch of cowboys who just want to get the job done as fast as possible and collect the cash
    The amount of times I've seen people with solar panels on the North side of their homes is unbelievable. Most people are so stupid I'm surprised they can tie their own shoe-laces, let alone install solar panels. To see these amazing North-facing solar panels, with technology so advanced that they don't even need to face the sun, drive up the N3 to Cavan, from Dublin. There is also a wind-turbine, in the middle of drumlins, crazy stuff! So professional installation is necessary, if not for yourself, but there should be inspectors to weed out the cowboys. People that do insulation are the worst, 60% of them are pure cowboys, but people don't know what a well insulated house feels like, so they don't realise they've been shafted. They just think that they wasted their money.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    Mozart1986 wrote: »
    The amount of times I've seen people with solar panels on the North side of their homes is unbelievable. So professional installation is necessary, if not for yourself, but there should be inspectors to weed out the cowboys.

    Things aren't generally that bad... The vast vast majority of solar panels are not on the north side of a roof. I once had an enquiry from somone who wanted panels on the north roof where they would be conspicuous from the road, but we talked 'em out of that!

    There is a system of inspection by SEI and installers must have passed a FETAC training course. There are some deficiencies in the standards to my mind, but not to the point of a plethora of north-facing panels. The deficiencies I see are the lack of heat dumps (to dump surplus heat during vacations etc), inadequate heat loss protection on other pipework coming off the cylinder, badly set up controllers etc. Some of these systems may give trouble in time, but SEI insists on a five year warranty.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 191 ✭✭Mozart1986


    Things aren't generally that bad... The vast vast majority of solar panels are not on the north side of a roof. I once had an enquiry from somone who wanted panels on the north roof where they would be conspicuous from the road, but we talked 'em out of that!

    There is a system of inspection by SEI and installers must have passed a FETAC training course. There are some deficiencies in the standards to my mind, but not to the point of a plethora of north-facing panels. The deficiencies I see are the lack of heat dumps (to dump surplus heat during vacations etc), inadequate heat loss protection on other pipework coming off the cylinder, badly set up controllers etc. Some of these systems may give trouble in time, but SEI insists on a five year warranty.
    I'm not lying or exagerating. Maybe its just a phenomena located around the N3, but there are loads of them. You definitely need people to install them, and also inspectors. I don't know how many inspectors the SEI has.

    Isn't it mad though, you even said you had your own experience with it. People actually think that solar panels will work ok faced away from the sun!?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    Mozart1986 wrote: »
    Maybe its just a phenomena located around the N3......People actually think that solar panels will work ok faced away from the sun!?!
    Maybe they're watching too much "Home & Away"?:)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,113 ✭✭✭freddyuk


    The feed in tariff is 19c for the first 3,000 units exported at present, 9c thereafter.

    Grid tie inverters are a lot more efficient than batteries. Modern inverters are 94% efficient.

    I understand the FIT is 10c after the first 3,000 units but only for 5 years. Also this is only for the first 4,000 applications?
    Not sure if this will be revised in the future but i am enquiring about this option.
    Compared to the UK scheme it is a bit mean!

    Feel free to correct me on this

    Cheers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 191 ✭✭Mozart1986


    Maybe they're watching too much "Home & Away"?:)
    Thats probably right, so they must also be completely flumixed when they flush the toilet or leave the tap running:)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 pollydolly


    taconnol wrote: »
    OP, please state your opinion and don't simply quote the first paragraph of the article.

    Also, this is an Irish forum, not an English one.


    Mother Earth does not understand national borders, they are a man-made concept - we are all earthlings!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 davidconnors


    This is a good initiative and will ultimately push the research and efficiency of micro generation upwards. IMO in the next 10-15 years every house should have its own PV solar system, once systems improve to a certain point you'd be mad not to, (even in Ireland:rolleyes:).
    I looked into the micro generation windturbines and found them expensive with a very long payback on the lower cheaper versions. I found that higher capacity industrial units made more sense.
    I fitted a <snip> thermodynamic solar panel system and found it was much better than traditional solar as it can even be used at night. I am a huge convert now as the savings are real. (Got a 250, single panel system for 5 people in house)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    I fitted a <snip> thermodynamic solar panel system and found it was much better than traditional solar as it can even be used at night.
    You've had three posts on this forum and in every single one, you've promoted a certain company. Please note that advertising/shilling is not permitted. It is quite possible to discuss the merits of solar panels without repeatedly referring to a specific supplier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,025 ✭✭✭d'Oracle


    pollydolly wrote: »
    Mother Earth does not understand national borders, they are a man-made concept - we are all earthlings!

    Mother Common-Sense understands that Ireland has no such policy and whinging about british policies on an Irish website is pure nonsense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Shiny


    I'm sure the German solar feed in tariff had a similar loss but it
    contributed to a massive surge in solar research and development world wide.

    For that alone, it is worth it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭quentingargan


    Shiny wrote: »
    I'm sure the German solar feed in tariff had a similar loss but it
    contributed to a massive surge in solar research and development world wide.

    For that alone, it is worth it.
    Yes, but Spain took the same approach, paying 45c per KwHr, then when the quota was met, they reduced the price to about 31c, and the industry imploded. In Germany the tariff is still very generous, so the industry remains buoyant, but it is hard to imagine it remaining so lucrative if the price dropped significantly.

    But Ireland will never be a major player in solar - we don't have the competitive edge that would apply in more southern countries. Our competitive edge would be in wind and wave power surely?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,259 ✭✭✭Shiny


    I agree that the industry wouldn't be too lucrative if the tariffs were
    to be taken away but they serve to create demand for solar products
    which in facilitates advancements in the technology. Eventually the
    prices of production should fall to the level where tariffs are not
    necessary any more.

    There is no denying that solar performance is relatively poor in
    Ireland but it isn't much better than Germany either. I think solar
    will have a place in Ireland when the prices come down because not
    everyone will be able to install a wind turbine.


Advertisement