Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

compact vs. audax

  • 23-02-2010 5:50pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭


    Okay, going to start the hoary "which bike?" thread in installments. I'm going to get a road bike on the CTW.
    No ambitions apart from a few spins and sportives, so the first thing I need to decide is whether I want pure bred racer or a more relaxed geometry as the saying goes.
    I currently ride a tricross and love it. As far as I can tell, the main things this has versus a pure bred racer is longer chain stays and a bigger head tube (as well as braze points and bigger wheel clearance). So my initial thoughts are moving from an Allez to say the Tifosi CK7.
    Now I can see myself thinking "wish I had full mudguards/pannier etc", yet I have yet to find myself wishing I had shorter chain stays.
    Say I go to cycleways and have a short spin on an Allez, what am I supposed to notice over the relaxed geometry? Aside from the ability to hit my foot with the front wheel?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,995 ✭✭✭✭blorg


    Will you be getting rid of the Tricross?

    If not, I would suggest that it does the full mudguard/relaxed geometry bit and you might want to consider a full on racer. No point getting two bikes the same.

    I find my racers just plain more fun to ride, hard to put a finger on what it is exactly. More nimble maybe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭souter


    Man you're quick! No, the tricross stays. When you say more nimble, is that good or bad for descending? (I discovered I couldn't descend last year)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,995 ✭✭✭✭blorg


    souter wrote: »
    Man you're quick! No, the tricross stays. When you say more nimble, is that good or bad for descending? (I discovered I couldn't descend last year)
    Good for descending, good for going up too. The Tricross is very heavy also, I think you should at least try a full-on race bike. Something different.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,390 ✭✭✭IM0


    blorg wrote:
    No point getting two bikes the same.

    :eek: .
    Of course to the *normals* ..all bikes are the same ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,390 ✭✭✭IM0


    souter wrote: »
    Okay, going to start the hoary hourly "which bike?" thread in installments. I'm going to get a road bike on the CTW.

    Now I can see myself thinking "wish I had full mudguards/pannier etc", yet I have yet to find myself wishing I had shorter chain stays.

    mwuhahaha welcome to the beginning of your *stable*
    souter wrote:
    Say I go to cycleways and have a short spin on an Allez, what am I supposed to notice over the relaxed geometry? Aside from the ability to hit my foot with the front wheel?

    the go faster stripes ;)

    and a less comfortable ride, and the ability to knock yourself off with one foot when turning real slow.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,995 ✭✭✭✭blorg


    Toe overlap is not a major problem, honest. There are very few situations you might hit the front wheel. I have it on my fixed Tricross incidentally and even there it is not a problem.

    It's not universal with road bikes either, it depends on the bike, the size and your shoe size.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭sexpot


    I'd say go with the relaxed definitely. I've used both a racer and tourer for commuting and the relaxed geometry is preferable if your loaded with stuff, especially a bag on the bag. Panniers etc can be loaded well on a tourer as well.

    You could still have some nice spins on a tourer/audax bike, just take the pannier stuff off etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,390 ✭✭✭IM0


    blorg wrote: »
    It's not universal with road bikes either, it depends on the bike, the size and your shoe size.

    and whether or not you like mudguards on the winter bike, mine is a PITA at tight T juntions of small roads, I nearly get run over as once I push and turn onto the top of the T I cant get another stroke out untill facing the edge of the T :rolleyes:..if you know what I mean, some hairy moments

    Good times!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 634 ✭✭✭souter


    me@ucd wrote: »
    mwuhahaha welcome to the beginning of your *stable*



    the go faster stripes ;)

    and a less comfortable ride, and the ability to knock yourself off with one foot when turning real slow.
    Yes, that does all have appeal. Regarding footstrike, anything that makes the bike trickier makes me cooler, I can handle that.

    I want a bike that is an understated design classic for < 1000 euro, which will allow me to pootle about without being called into some hammertrain, but still have the rudimentary technology to climb hills and wipeout any POB.

    Screw the audax, I want to live on the edge.


Advertisement