The Next Big Vaccination Scam: Norovirus

uprising2

You've likely never heard of it, but you've probably had it several times. It's a mild stomach virus. You get nausea and possibly vomit or have diarrhea. You feel bad for a day or so, and then it's over. No big deal—until now.
http://www.gaia-health.com/articles151/000158-the-next-big-vaccine-scam-norovirus.shtml



Déjà vu, anybody?

Truthrevolution

I dont think that people will be as gullable this time

uprising2

Truthrevolution wrote: »

I dont think that people will be as gullable this time

Don't hold your breath brother, some people are STILL getting the swine flu jab.
And when these multimillion dollar PR/Propaganda machines get rolling, people get rolling up their sleeves, sad but true.

phantom_lord

lol what a ridiculous article. how can you spend your time reading/posting links like that?

bytey

seems to me the plan is working a treat

if they do mean to cull the population , then the swine flue is the perfect double blind

1/ loads of hysteria, so people rush to get the jab

people realise - ok it aint as serious as they made out

2. follow up with another one , again that people relaise it is not as bad as expected

3/ many people will now be sick and tired of the hype and
BAM
release something deadly and fast spreading but seemingly innocous - that people think , ah nah , not again - im not falling for another one.

by which time its too late anyway and you are infected .


just a suggestion , it could also of course , just be another money making racket ( more likely )

uprising2

phantom_lord wrote: »

lol what a ridiculous article. how can you spend your time reading/posting links like that?

How can you spend your time posting 11,500+ posts, and you obviously read it, now who's ridiculous? lol:rolleyes:

Just to rub salt into that wound, here's something more ridiculous "I'm over the moon. This is my over the moon face." get out much???

Pete M.

bytey wrote: »

by which time its too late anyway and you are infected .( more likely )

Z-day you mean?????:eek:

i mean :cool:

I've read da survival guide....

phantom_lord

uprising2 wrote: »

you obviously read it, now who's ridiculous?

i just find it odd that you ct people insist your the ones that research and know the real truth, while reading stuff like this nonsense from the daily mail school of journalism.

mysterious

phantom_lord wrote: »

i just find it odd that you ct people insist your the ones that research and know the real truth, while reading stuff like this nonsense from the daily mail school of journalism.

Most people see common sense, I fail to see why you assume that only C.Ts type people would bring this up. PEOPLE are not falling for this nonsense anymore.

Come on dude. ffs.

phantom_lord

mysterious wrote: »

PEOPLE are not falling for this nonsense anymore.

they evidently are if people can give any credence to that article.

amacachi

bytey wrote: »

seems to me the plan is working a treat

if they do mean to cull the population , then the swine flue is the perfect double blind

1/ loads of hysteria, so people rush to get the jab

people realise - ok it aint as serious as they made out

2. follow up with another one , again that people relaise it is not as bad as expected

3/ many people will now be sick and tired of the hype and
BAM
release something deadly and fast spreading but seemingly innocous - that people think , ah nah , not again - im not falling for another one.

by which time its too late anyway and you are infected .


just a suggestion , it could also of course , just be another money making racket ( more likely )

Flawless logic right there.

mysterious

phantom_lord wrote: »

they evidently are if people can give any credence to that article.

You don't "have" to read that article to get the idea of what kind of agendas are happening and will happen in the future.

We are sheep to them, whether you admit that or not. Only way way to prove that is try uncover what they say behind closed doors at elitists, bilderburg and other satanic conferences on every assigned date they meet up at.


Who lives, who dies, which war starts, which ones end and so on.

phantom_lord

good thing you're here to tell us about it and save us i guess.

uprising2

phantom_lord wrote: »

i just find it odd that you ct people insist your the ones that research and know the real truth, while reading stuff like this nonsense from the daily mail school of journalism.

phantom_lord wrote: »

they evidently are if people can give any credence to that article.

phantom_lord wrote: »

good thing you're here to tell us about it and save us i guess.

WTF?, here simply to cause trouble?

robtri

uprising2 wrote: »

Déjà vu, anybody?

Deja vu... yes.... stupid picture, put out there to stir emotions..... reminds me of another posters modus operandus...

phantom_lord

uprising2 wrote: »

WTF?, here simply to cause trouble?

i'm just pointing out how silly your article and indeed most of the stuff in this forum is. and you're obviously incapable of providing any sort of robust defence.

humanji

Phantom_lord, if you don't want to discuss the topic, don't post here.

Undergod

uprising2 wrote: »

You've likely never heard of it, but you've probably had it several times. It's a mild stomach virus. You get nausea and possibly vomit or have diarrhea. You feel bad for a day or so, and then it's over. No big deal—until now.
http://www.gaia-health.com/articles151/000158-the-next-big-vaccine-scam-norovirus.shtml



Déjà vu, anybody?

The next big virus scam is we're going to be injected with money?

Truthrevolution

Suppose everything thats stated in the article turns out to be true and they one day decide to push a Norovirus vaccine, will you lot detract your criticism??

rccaulfield

Hilaroius article! Thanks for posting! To think 2 people cant keep a secret and you 'logically' think all those people can hide a ridiculous idea like that- how very very very sad!

uprising2

rccaulfield wrote: »

Hilaroius article! Thanks for posting! To think 2 people cant keep a secret and you 'logically' think all those people can hide a ridiculous idea like that- how very very very sad!

Yea ridiculous, did you have your swine flu jab?, your the sad one, time will tell as it has time and time again, and maybe i'll go looking for this post and remind you, then we'll see who's ridiculous.

Anything is possible, remember that.

humanji

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Suppose everything thats stated in the article turns out to be true and they one day decide to push a Norovirus vaccine, will you lot detract your criticism??

If it turns out to be nonsense, will you admit to being wrong? Where conspiracy theories are concerned, the goalposts seem to be forever in flux. I guess nobody will know for sure until a theory is proven true or false.

uprising2

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Suppose everything thats stated in the article turns out to be true and they one day decide to push a Norovirus vaccine, will you lot detract your criticism??

No they'll ignore it and make up some lizard people sh1t, and make stupid comments on a different topic.

RoboClam

Yeah, the vaccine has been developed since 2007. It'll probably be used mostly in developing countries. You see, unless you're immuno-compromised, elderly, or have an underlying condition, then it's not a problem for us in the western world. However this sentence "You get nausea and possibly vomit or have diarrhea. You feel bad for a day or so, and then it's over. No big deal" does not apply to the third world. Diarrhea kills over a million people annually.

So my prediction is that this will not be rolled out in the way this article describes.

uprising2

humanji wrote: »

If it turns out to be nonsense, will you admit to being wrong? Where conspiracy theories are concerned, the goalposts seem to be forever in flux. I guess nobody will know for sure until a theory is proven true or false.

If it turns out to be wrong, I'll put up my hand and say it was bolllox, no problem.

Truthrevolution

RoboClam wrote: »

Yeah, the vaccine has been developed since 2007. It'll probably be used mostly in developing countries. You see, unless you're immuno-compromised, elderly, or have an underlying condition, then it's not a problem for us in the western world. However this sentence "You get nausea and possibly vomit or have diarrhea. You feel bad for a day or so, and then it's over. No big deal" does not apply to the third world. Diarrhea kills over a million people annually.

So my prediction is that this will not be rolled out in the way this article describes.

Didnt they say that about the Swine flu, "only the immuno-compromised,elderly, or peole with underlying conditions" need worry about it, yet they still pushed a mass global vaccine programme

RoboClam

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Didnt they say that about the Swine flu, "only the immuno-compromised,elderly, or peole with underlying conditions" need worry about it, yet they still pushed a mass global vaccine programme

No, the seasonal flu affected those people. The thing that was worrying about swine flu was that it was affecting the young instead.

Truthrevolution

RoboClam wrote: »

No, the seasonal flu affected those people.

Maybe i was halucinating when i seen those notices and heard the advice lines which stated that information

amacachi

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Maybe i was halucinating when i seen those notices and heard the advice lines which stated that information

It was mostly people with pre-existing conditions who were thought to be at risk but more broadly it was thought the younger portion of the population was at risk due to Cytokine Storm.

RoboClam

Truthrevolution wrote: »

Maybe i was halucinating when i seen those notices and heard the advice lines which stated that information

Well I mean it obviously affected that group of people too! I was drawing attention to your use of "only". The swine flu did affect a group of people who are not normally affected, such as younger healthy people. But this is getting off topic.

bonkey

uprising2 wrote: »

your the sad one,

Don't get personal