Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Reporting on death of Sunday Mirror's Rupert Hamer

  • 11-01-2010 1:43pm
    #1
    Alcatel
    Closed Accounts Posts: 217 ✭✭


    I wanted to make a note on the tragic death of Rupert Hamer, the Sunday Mirror correspondant who was killed whilst embedded with US Marine's in Afghanistan. He's the first British reporter to die in Afghanistan since the war began in 2001.

    However, the reporting of the story was and is, to my mind, overblown.

    I have been reading and watching and listening to coverage, and a lot of the time the US Marine who was killed alongside Mr Hamer is not mentioend at all. Mr Hamer's death should not, to my mind, receive any more attention than the death of any serviceman or woman, from any country. How many squaddies, GI's or Jarheads get the front page in newspapers these days?

    That Mr Hamer is the first UK journalist to die in the conflict is worthy of note. But I feel in general that we gloss over many of the deaths of soldiers in the media these days, and I find it unsettling to see Mr Hamer getting considerable attention versus the deaths 12 other military personnel, including 1 British, since the beginning of the year.


Comments

  • #2
    Morlar
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,273 ✭✭✭Morlar


    Alcatel wrote: »
    However, the reporting of the story was and is, to my mind, overblown.

    I agree with you there. The one that sticks out was the rotating skynews report which signed off with following hyperbole ;

    'reporting from a warzone has never been more dangerous'.


  • #3
    HalloweenJack
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,334 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    The thing is these soldiers are involved in the war, therefore there is a public perception that they are more likely to die.

    In contrast, this journalist is a relative by-stander who's just "doing his job", that's why the media are playing it up becuase he was "innocent", compared to the soldiers.

    Soldiers sign up for the army. They know they could be thrown into a war but they still join. They are aware of the risk involved.

    Journalists are there to report the story. They don't want to get involved in the fighting, they just want to observe it and report on it. Morally, the journalists have a more noble occupation, whether the media organisation they work for supports the war or not.

    Plus, the killed soldiers were American, not British.


Advertisement