Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Termination payments

  • 08-01-2010 12:59pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 736 ✭✭✭


    Hello all,

    Looking through the 1997 Acts and can't find an answer to this question. If a close company is about to go into liquidation (liquidator not yet appointed), can the directors receive the tax free termination payment (basic, increased basic or SCSB) prior to the liquidation?

    For some reason I thought the company had to be a continuing business when termination payments were being made but I think im confusing corporation tax legislation for the allowability of the payment with income tax legislation and the allowance to receive the sums tax free.

    IT21 seems unclear re liquidations

    Any info would be appreciated


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 johnc2212


    s123 & s 201 of the TCA 1997 deals with termination payments and don't mention the scenario you mention. However, the case you present is not just a tax question, there are legal questions that require answering i.e. what type of liquidation, which in turn will impact on your directors' position.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,798 ✭✭✭Mr. Incognito


    No.

    There is a cast iron hierarchy of creditors when a company is wound up.

    Revenue.
    Court Fees if applicable.
    Creditors.
    Preferential Shareholders.
    Ordinary Shareholders.
    Then staff of all ranks.

    This is a company law question and not a tax one. The reason it is not mentioned in the tax legislation is because it is in the the Companies Act 1963 and has nothing to do with tax.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 johnc2212


    I believe shareholders are last in the order


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1 BZBee


    Who would be awarding the payment?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 Corrs LIGHT


    'reckless trading'?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,094 ✭✭✭dbran


    Hi

    As previously mentioned this is a company law question rather then a tax question.

    Paying a director a termination payment on redundancy would very likely be viewed as a preferential payment of creditors. In the same way that even clearing an overdraft that is personally guaranteed by the director would be treated as preferential payment of creditors.

    I believe the liquidator can subsequently persue the director for repayment of the termination payment.

    It depends of it is a solvent or an insolvent liquidation

    Kind Regards


    dbran


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭censuspro


    Legend100 wrote: »
    Hello all,

    Looking through the 1997 Acts and can't find an answer to this question. If a close company is about to go into liquidation (liquidator not yet appointed), can the directors receive the tax free termination payment (basic, increased basic or SCSB) prior to the liquidation?

    For some reason I thought the company had to be a continuing business when termination payments were being made but I think im confusing corporation tax legislation for the allowability of the payment with income tax legislation and the allowance to receive the sums tax free.

    IT21 seems unclear re liquidations

    Any info would be appreciated

    From a taxation perspective, the directors are allowed to received the termination payments that you mentioned. However, the company may not be entitled to a deduction for the payments.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 ✭✭CheltenhamJ


    I agree with most of the above , it is very much in the realms of a potential reckless trading situation and a company law issue. The questions of deductibility depends on whether the business is continuing or not and the Southport Printers case should be referred to in this regard.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27 johnc2212


    Hi do you have a source for the Southport Printers case?


Advertisement