Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Terminator Salvation and other 'Director's Cut's

  • 23-11-2009 8:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭


    Was on HMV's website today and they are offering on BluRay the 'exclusive to HMV' director's cut of Terminator Salvation.
    Just wondering what differences there are between the two versions and if it's worth picking up instead of the regular one?

    Oh, and if anyone replies with "Who cares, the film sucked!" or similar responses their posts will be deleted so don't even bother.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,489 ✭✭✭iMax


    It's Mod Vs Mod. Two Enter. One Leaves.

    (there's about three minutes of extra footage including a nude scene & more blood AFAIK)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    It's Mod Vs Mod. Two Enter. One Leaves.

    hmmm I'm trying to work out who's worse off, the one who has to leave or the one who has to stay behind and clean up after you lot?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,753 ✭✭✭qz


    The one who saw the film in the first place, load of shíte!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    back on topic.

    Dear Sir/Madam

    I as a high up FOX executive have come to a wonderful conclusion. Since we have this thing called franchises which we regulary take our pants off and take a big sh*t about and we have these people who willingly eat it up in the cinema but will refuse the home edition. I propose we introduce a plea of artistic cry of defiance to convince them for second helpings. We will get whatever hack director who made the film to cry that his vision was squandered for the sake of ratings or us evil execs *ho ho ho* and those people who call themselves fans will willingly lap up the dvd, but not only that but we could stamp it on the *special edition* dvd/blu ray and make even more of a bundle, recovering from the damage of giving the franchise to such idiots in the first place. We have already let paul w.s anderson try this policy out a number of times promising that the *best scenes* were cut from his director cuts from some of the biggest franchises he has worked on and put the blame on us. It has proven to work and we wish to continue it with MCG today.


    Your's sincerly

    THE GUY F*CKING YOU IN THE ASS!


    that sums up the whole affair nicely and is exactly what is happening. Dont bother.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    BlitzKrieg wrote: »
    who cares the movie really did suck

    Cheeky monkey!
    iMax wrote: »
    It's Mod Vs Mod. Two Enter. One Leaves.

    Only one Mods this forum ;)
    iMax wrote: »
    (there's about three minutes of extra footage including a nude scene & more blood AFAIK)
    BlitzKrieg wrote: »

    Kudos for the responses. Doesn't sound worth the extra pennies.

    [/thread]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    Thread re-opened due to a very interesting PM I recieved. (try to guess who it was from)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭Exar Khun


    McG?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    Galvasean wrote: »
    Only one Mods this forum ;)
    [/thread]


    only cause I was at the cinema when they offered the position :D


    Anywho. Director editions tend to be scams more often then not. Especially with franchises like this.

    Case in point I mentioned Paul W.S Anderson earlier

    This is his defence of AVP when it was in the cinema:

    http://www.darkhorizons.com/news/863/paul-anderson-talks-avp-cut
    "About the studio's cutting of the film, which he had no control over, he said, and I quote, "All of the best scenes were cut." Anderson was obviously very annoyed at the way the film was released. However, this was not purely because of the PG-13 limitation, which incidentally, the studio enforced THREE WEEKS before the release date! It was always going to be R until then.

    Part of the reason for the cutting was that some of the effects were not ready by the time the release date came around. The effects team had very little time to do anything.

    As far as the content that was cut, apparently we see all those who die, die on screen, but he also said that there is a sub-plot that we will have to wait for on DVD. Yes there will be an R-rated Director's cut DVD although they don't know the release date yet".

    from the films wiki
    John J. Puccio of DVD Town remarked that the extra footage contained "a few more shots of blood, gore, guts, and slime to spice things up...and tiny bits of connecting matter to help us follow the story line better, but none of it amounts to much."[40]

    Anyone who has seen the director's cut of AVP know this is complete bullsh*t

    And as much as I would love to rip on the studio system as much as any other stranger on the internet, there are many cases where it is used to excuse a sh*tty movie from a sh*tty director.

    The problem with the internet is everybody reads it, even the sh*tty director.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,477 ✭✭✭Kipperhell


    I can seem some director's cuts have value but it certainly has been a marketing ploy for a while now. Maybe we should start a thread with a list of director cuts worth seeing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭indough


    it depensd on the director, obviously enough i suppose :)

    someone like james cameron now id pay the extra

    someone like michael bay or roland emmerich, not so much


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭indough


    although i wouldnt buy their movies in the first place admittedly


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    it depensd on the director, obviously enough i suppose

    someone like james cameron now id pay the extra

    James Cameron is notorious for director cuts. Aliens, terminator 2, the abyss, titanic all had immense director cut versions.

    Oliver stone while not always good films, takes the notion of director's cut much more literal seeing as alexander got completely recut when he did it (twice)

    and he tends to add 25-30 minutes onto his.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭indough


    BlitzKrieg wrote: »
    James Cameron is notorious for director cuts. Aliens, terminator 2, the abyss, titanic all had immense director cut versions.

    i actually like them though

    what do you mean by notorious, i mean in what way?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    that they always happen. There's no point buying any of his films when they first hit dvd/vhs as a director's cut will show up and will most likely be better (he's not a chancer like MCG or paul W.S Anderson.)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,857 ✭✭✭indough


    oh i see yeah, i always wait anyway haha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,746 ✭✭✭✭Galvasean


    I saw the director's cut of T2 before the cinema released one. When I saw the latter I was thinking, "Wow, how could they have left those bits out?!"


Advertisement