Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cig C&C

  • 05-11-2009 11:45pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 790 ✭✭✭


    95382.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭smelltheglove


    Its hard to see it all together as the imahe is so large but I would like to see the cig in focus as opposed to the lighter. maybe resize the image down so the full image can be seen on screen for more c&c


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭FX Meister


    does nothing at all for me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭Snap Happy


    I think the lighter has such good detail you are actually losing the interest of the photo by having it out of focus.
    I think you should try get the whole lighter in focus.

    Cig could be lost or kept but does nothing for me in the photo.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,536 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    No mood to it, too much white and cig itself should be in focus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,155 ✭✭✭PopeBuckfastXVI


    Quite unbalanced as a composition, too much dead space in the left and bottom, which doesn't work. Selective focus is too selective and the lighting is very flat and tungsteny. As for the subject matter, it's completely meh to be honest.

    The selective focus and narrow DoF would work very well on a brighter, more interesting subject with a different background.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,009 ✭✭✭KarmaGarda


    Doesn't work for me either. I can see you were trying to use an interesting DOF to possibly achieve interestingness, but it somewhat distorts the photo. And the left and bottom (mainly left) is completely blown out which doesn't work either.

    Because I don't get it, I need to ask: What were you trying to achieve out of the photo here? i.e. what is it supposed to say/mean.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,155 ✭✭✭PopeBuckfastXVI


    One more thing, when I full screen it I still can't see the whole photo, if you keep it to 800px on the longest side it would be easier to see the whole photo, and judge it in full context, rather than scrolling.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 790 ✭✭✭uprising


    KarmaGarda wrote: »
    Because I don't get it, I need to ask: What were you trying to achieve out of the photo here? i.e. what is it supposed to say/mean.

    Erm sorry no big artistic meaning behind it, was testing autofocus points and apatures at different ISO's handheld, just testing a lens, put my cig down and snapped it.
    I totally agree its a meaningless eyesore, just sometimes I'm amused with the psychological photographers around the net, trying to take meaning from [EMAIL="cr@p"]cr@p[/EMAIL].
    I've 20 years photo experience, I don't really post photo's online, but I've seen some long discussions about bin worthy pics portrayed as art.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,009 ✭✭✭KarmaGarda


    uprising wrote: »
    Erm sorry no big artistic meaning behind it, was testing autofocus points and apatures at different ISO's handheld, just testing a lens, put my cig down and snapped it.
    I totally agree its a meaningless eyesore, just sometimes I'm amused with the psychological photographers around the net, trying to take meaning from cr@p.
    I've 20 years photo experience, I don't really post photo's online, but I've seen some long discussions about bin worthy pics portrayed as art.

    Fair point! I suppose it goes to prove you can't pass off any old cr@p as art either :D

    To be brutally honest, I couldn't disagree with a word of your reply all the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,155 ✭✭✭PopeBuckfastXVI


    So you just put it up and marked it C&C for the chuckle?

    Thanks for the waste of time...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭TelePaul


    So you just put it up and marked it C&C for the chuckle?

    Thanks for the waste of time...

    What are you saying, it's AMAZING!!!!


Advertisement