Computer Holy Wars - Vi vs Emacs

Naikon

Vim:pac:

Naikon

Emacs

Oh crap, not again:o

DIT mods, feel free to lock/move this to where it belongs.
Yes I know, I am an idiot >_<

credibility -1

Sheeps

Textpad owns.

Sheeps

or any non linux text editor

wixfjord

I understand less of this than I did of that Irish post yesterday

Sheeps

All you need to understand is that Linux is a terrible operating system for nerds.

Vorr1k

Naikon wrote: »

credibility -1

Ha


Also textpad ownzzzz

Naikon

Emacs

Sheeps wrote: »

All you need to understand is that Linux is a terrible operating system for nerds.

Bzzzt....WRONG!

It's pointless bitching about topics you have fcuk all
knowledge of in fairness.

If you presented even a shred of objective reasoning for your slander
it might justify your "Linuz su4ks Lulz" crusade. Use what you want:pac:

Naikon

Emacs

Vorr1k wrote: »

Ha


Also textpad ownzzzz

I hope you didn't take my self bashing literally.
Figure of speech and all that.

Results seem nicely balanced...

Tar.Aldarion

Programmers notepad!

Sheeps

Naikon wrote: »

Bzzzt....WRONG!

It's pointless bitching about topics you have fcuk all
knowledge of in fairness.

If you presented even a shred of objective reasoning for your slander
it might justify your "Linuz su4ks Lulz" crusade. Use what you want:pac:

Nope, Sorry. I'm not wrong. Linux is terrible and vastly inferior to Windows and in some cases even Mac OS (terrible also) too.


Stop being trying to like Linux for the sake of it. Take that chip off your shoulder and admit that Microsoft are more creative and build better products.

Naikon

Emacs

Sheeps wrote: »

Nope, Sorry. I'm not wrong. Linux is terrible and vastly inferior to Windows and in some cases even Mac OS (terrible also) too.


Stop being trying to like Linux for the sake of it. Take that chip off your shoulder and admit that Microsoft are more creative and build better products.

I hate to burst your bubble, but Microsoft has never been truely innovative.
Microsoft is great at making money. Not so much for innovation.

The company exists to make money by re-implementing existing technology
and abuse open standards in the process. Windows takes plenty of concepts
from Unix. Ever wonder why web hyperlinks use forward slash notation? Unix.

Name one Microsoft product that is actually "innovative" in that it
fundamentally changed computing for the greater good.

I count zero so far.

Sheeps

Naikon wrote: »

I hate to burst your bubble, but Microsoft has never been truely innovative.
Microsoft is great at making money, but not innovation.

The company exists simply to re-implement existing technology and abuse
open standards in the process. Windows takes plenty of concepts from Unix.
Ever wonder why web hyperlinks use forward slash notation? Unix carryover.

Name one Microsoft product that is actually "innovative" in that it
fundamentally changed computing for the greater good.

I count zero so far.

Microsoft have pretty much set the standard with their innovative products. Don't know what you're talking about. Linux is just a open source clone and will never be better than the real thing.

Naikon

Emacs

Sheeps wrote: »

Microsoft have pretty much set the standard with their innovative products. Don't know what you're talking about. Linux is just a open source clone and will never be better than the real thing.

What innovative products?
They "set the standards" because they have a monopoly on the desktop.

Name a few please. I am not referring solely to Linux, but to open source at large.
Linux is just a natural evolution of open source principles/design.

Your argument stands piss weak at the moment.

Sheeps

Nah, linux is a cheap clone for nerds.

Naikon

Emacs

Sheeps wrote: »

Nah, linux is a cheap clone for nerds.

How is it cheap? You aren't even listening to the more important
point I am trying to make. Name a product. You can buy Linux off
commercial vendors you know.

Why doesn't core net infrastructure run on Windows server and the like? It's not purely because of cost.
Hotmail ran on FreeBSD servers for years. I donate to Linux projects when I can, and I would glady pay
for support if I actually needed it. Red Hat is a pretty profitable company.

Sheeps

Rofl Linux is for nerds.

Naikon

Emacs

I take it your sole intention is to have this thread locked. You have failed.
Now if you want to actually discuss this further. Shoot ahead!

Sheeps

90% of the world uses Windows for a reason. People who contribute to Linux are communists.

Naikon

Emacs

Sheeps wrote: »

90% of the world uses Windows for a reason. People who contribute to Linux are communists.

Answer my above question please. Commies ehhh? I suggest you read up
a bit more on the topic: Link

Some companies do charge for their Linux products.
"Free Software" is not synonymous with no charge.

Creamy Goodness

Oh dear lord.

Naikon

Emacs

Creamy Goodness wrote: »

Oh dear lord.

Here is a helmet and a rifle.
I expect the sh4t to hit the fan soon:D

workaccount

Jasuz just report the troll - don't feed it.

Creamy Goodness

Naikon wrote: »

Here is a helmet and a rifle.
I expect the sh4t to hit the fan soon:D

i don't need a helmet, railgun ftw!

Sheeps

Lol, talk about taking the bait.

Creamy Goodness

Sheeps wrote: »

Lol, talk about taking the bait.

Hi Aindriu :pac:

Sheeps

:v

Tar.Aldarion

Sheeps wrote: »

90% of the world uses Windows for a reason. People who contribute to Linux are communists.

so much bait, can not take it captain :pac:

Naikon

Emacs

I should have known...
Still, good trolling none the less:pac:

This thread could have been 100+ pages long:(