Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Triple H Interview

  • 24-10-2009 5:33pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,943 ✭✭✭


    Powerslam published an interview with HHH this month (and Stephanie McMahon), because I'm too lazy to transcribe the entire thing, here are some highlights:
    Advice to aspiring wrestlers: Personality, that's the key to everything. I see a lot of guys who are good wrestlers - good hands - and they might have a decent match, but they all look like they're cut from the same mould.

    On possibly retiring: Right now, the talent's not there: there is no depth.

    On star creation: All the stars are at a certain level. You can't make someone a star by simply bringing other stars down. That's not how the business works; it's not how it's ever worked. The new stars have to rise on their own. What big star ever laid down for me?... I've never said "No" to putting anybody over. But you put CM Punk in a 30-minute match with The Undertaker, it's 50-50 all the way and Punk wins clean, the fans won't accept it. It does nothing for CM Punk and it's also detrimental to The Undertaker.

    Future Headliners: Well, CM Punk is obviously on his way to becoming a big star. Jack Swagger, I like. Sheamus. Evan Bourne is very good. Kofi Kingston. They are all moving up, but slowly, which is the right way.

    Anybody he's mentoring: The closest to me is probably Sheamus, because we always train together on the road. ... As for seeing some of myself in someone? That's tough. Sheamus just the other day showed up at a show he didn't have to be at. He does whatever he's asked to do without complaining, he goes to every show and is always wanting to work: he does it all, goes above and beyond. That's what I like.

    Pretty glowing review of Sheamus. As for what big star laid down for him, I think he grossly underestimates the role Mick Foley played in getting him over.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭waltersobchak


    wow glowing praise for sheamus indeed, sound like he's well on his way too the top..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,788 ✭✭✭✭krudler


    On star creation: All the stars are at a certain level. You can't make someone a star by simply bringing other stars down. That's not how the business works; it's not how it's ever worked. The new stars have to rise on their own. What big star ever laid down for me?... I've never said "No" to putting anybody over. But you put CM Punk in a 30-minute match with The Undertaker, it's 50-50 all the way and Punk wins clean, the fans won't accept it. It does nothing for CM Punk and it's also detrimental to The Undertaker.

    Umm, The Rock, Foley, Austin, Angle, Taker, Hogan, Shawn,Flair, Orton,Jericho all say hi Hunter


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,375 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    wow glowing praise for sheamus indeed, sound like he's well on his way too the top..
    Well he does the one key thing required according to HHH and that is sucking up to HHH, that makes you star material.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,376 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    On possibly retiring: Right now, the talent's not there: there is no depth.

    and why is that?? because you spent so much time over the past 12 years hogging the spotlight that nobody else bar cena could get over :mad:
    What big star ever laid down for me?...

    oh good god :eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 937 ✭✭✭michael.etc...


    I thought he came across quite well in the interview. Obviously, the "what star ever laid down for me" line, is quite a howler, and he's towing the line in alot of answers. But he at least didn't shy away from acknowleding issues, and I felt given a longer interview, it could have been very interesting indeed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,640 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    krudler wrote: »
    Umm, The Rock, Foley, Austin, Angle, Taker, Hogan, Shawn,Flair, Orton,Jericho all say hi Hunter

    Booker T and RVD as well.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 22,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Bounty Hunter


    If Sheamus keeps doing what he's doing I can see a major push for him down the line o and pre-emptive linkity link


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    Thats the full interview. I did not type it out. :D:D

    THE SHORT INTERVIEW

    Danny Flexen managed to grab a few words with WWE bigwig Stephanie McMahon-Levesque at the September 18 weigh-in for the Mayweather vs. Marquez fight in Las Vegas . . .

    STEPHANIE, TO BEGIN, can you tell us what all of your WWE job titles are?
    I head up Creative Writing, Talent Relations, Talent Brand Management, Live Event Marketing and Live Event Management.

    That's some list. What's WWE's main focus in the near future?
    We are poised to take off like never before: becoming a truly global brand is the focus right now. Our television programmes are already in over 150 countries and translated into, I think, 30 languages. We have over 15 million viewers and over 15 million page-views per month on wwe.com

    For WWE to grow into a "truly global brand", I assume the company will have to stage more live arena events and television tapings outside the United States and Canada. But how about pay-per-views: do you envisage WWE promoting any from overseas markets?
    There will definitely be more live events. The problem with pay-per-view overseas is finding the right times and dates to accommodate the time difference. It also helps if we have big stars from those areas of the world: that helps us make inroads into their countries; a lower-level wrestler does not make much difference. Look at The Great Khali, for example: he's revered in India because he's been the (WWE World) champion.

    Does WWE need more headline stars in general to facilitate this expansion?
    We have to be cognisant of not spreading ourselves too thin. It can be borderline. We're constantly building new stars, and now we have a five-star training facility in Tampa that should help with that. Steve Keirn is heading that up, and we have Dusty Rhodes helping with character development and mike skills.

    I understand that you work long hours in the office and have to go on the road each week for WWE television tapings. Is it difficult to balance this work and travel schedule with being a parent to two young children? That you work for the family business alongside your husband Triple H helps, I imagine.
    I take my kids with me on the road, as they are the most important things in my life: I don't like to be away from my kids, and that's part of the reason why you don't see me on-screen as much as before . . . You know, I was always forbidden to marry someone in the business by my dad. But, yes, it's helpful, given we both understand the rigours of our lifestyle.

    Do you find it hard to leave your work at work? After all, you are technically your husband's boss.
    We actually don't (argue) much at all, except in the business. Sometimes, you can take your work home with you and sometimes you don't. But we always work things out.

    What about the schedule for the talent: are they working too many, too few or just the right number of live events?
    I think we worked it out . . . I don't have the figures in front of me, but the averages days worked per year was actually a lot lower than you'd except. We always try to keep the balance right, and I know that's something John Laurinaitis is always thinking about. The brand extension means it's worse than it was, but it also means there are more opportunities available for the guys who want to work.

    You've taken a lot of flak over the years for the role you play on the WWE writing team. Does it bother you?
    It used to . . . But I decided that people are going to think whatever they want to think. I try to do the best I can do. I don't read the dirt sheets at all anymore: they used to really bother me. But the numbers - live event attendances, TV ratings -- they tell me what I'm doing right and wrong. We're lucky in that way: we have a focus group in every town we go to every night, so if something's not working, we find out quickly and we can change it. We could be heading in the wrong direction and then completely change it.

    Would you care to predict who WWE's next big stars will be?
    You know, my dad always says he won't answer that question because he doesn't want to get into trouble, so I think I should say the same. I know who I've got my eyes on, though . . . There's a lot.

    Your older brother Shane is WWE's Executive Vice President, Global Media. As driven people in positions of authority in the same company, is there any sibling rivalry between you?
    Our roles don't exactly cross over that much. But I can't deny that we are, and always have been, competitive. Even now, as grown adults, after meetings we still play 'touched you last' - you know, like tag. We'll come out all serious, and then he'll tag me and shout, 'touched you last!' and then run away. (Shane's) the head of the International operation, so our paths cross when we do international live events - but we tend to work well together. I think our type of competition is a good kind: it drives us both on and makes the business better. But I cannot forsee a day when my dad (Vince McMahon) hands over the reins to either of us. He's still very much in charge -- and, trust me, everyone knows it.


    ---

    Quote:
    When Boxing News' senior writer and lifelong wrestling fan Danny Flexon attended the September 18 weigh-in for the Floyd Mayweather vs. Juan Manuel Marquez fight at the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas, he could not believe his luck when he ran into Paul 'Triple H' Levesque and the wrestler agreed on the spur of the moment to do an interview about WWE. What follows is the transcript of Flexen's conversation with HHH, who was in town with wife Stephanie to walk Mayweather to the ring before his fight the next day. To the writer's surprise, 'The Game' was both likeable and willing to discuss everything from retirement to the accusations that he exploits power in WWE . . .

    HUNTER, FROM humble beginnings on the independent scene as Terra Ryzing from 1992-1994 and prelim wrestler Jean-Paul Levesque in WCW from 1994-1995, you now hold an amazing position of power in WWE -- as a headliner on-screen and in the booking department backstage. What advice would you give to any aspiring wrestler who would like to reach your hofty heights in the ring?
    Personality: that's the key to everything. I see a lot of guys who are good wrestlers -- good hands --- and they might have a decent match, but they all look like they're cut from the same mould. Ric Flair tells this great story about when he was (wrestling) in Maryland (in the 1970s): it was his first real opportunity, and Blackjack Mulligan walked into the dressing room. He asked Ric what he was doing that night, and Ric said he had a four-minute match. Blackjack asked him, "What are you going to do in that four minutes to make yourself stand it, to make yourself different?" And that's what it's all about: what can you do to make the fans spend their money? It's like in boxing: Floyd Mayweather is a great fighter and a great personality.

    You said many younger wrestlers "look like they're cut from the same mould". Others have also brought up the "cookie cutter" syndrome. In WWE, do you think this could be attributed to the way in which prospects are prepared by the same team of trainers in the same development territory, Florida Championship Wrestling?
    A little of it. I think for your first few years (as a wrestler), you're so green and nervous that personality is the least of your concerns. And you're a victim of your own success: when I was coming up, there were lots of places to work and learn your craft and, by the time you got called up to the WWE, you already had plenty of ability - whereas now, you achieve a bit of success and you come in before you've learned. There's fewer places to send wrestlers where you can let them make mistakes. Guys used to say that WWE wouldn't even look at you until you've had five years' experience. But, now, we're looking at guys who've had between six months and a year.

    What's the remedy to this: more WWE developmental promotions?
    More developments . . . There are still some little groups out there. You should spend a year or two in as many different places as you can. If you have the desire, if you really want to learn, there are still areas, like Harley Race's company in (Eldon, Missouri) and Mexico, Japan, the U.K. You're going to starve, but it's about if (wrestling) is what you really want to do. It's all such a rush these days: everyone wants to be the next flash in the pan. But that's not a good thing to be, because the flash in the pan burns out so quickly.

    You've been on top for a decade. Now 40, you're married with two children. Do thoughts of retirement ever cross your mind?
    Sure. I've always said that I won't be one of those guys still wrestling at 50 or 60 like (Randy 'The Ram' Robinson) in (The Wrestler). I look at the business now from the other side and, if I was Vince McMahon, I'd know when to tell me to step away. Right now, the talent's not there: there is no depth. But, yeah, I do think about retiring: wrestling isn't the only thing iny my life, like it was when I broke in. If my family asked me to give up wrestling tomorrow, I'd do it in a heartbeat for them, and I'd never look back.

    Plenty of people say you use your backstage position and your marriage to your advantage --- even that you abuse the power you have. How do you respond to that? And does criticism bother you?
    People say the power I have puts me in a position of dominance but, if I lost that power, I'd be quite happy. It's all about what benefits the business for me. As for criticism? I think that if you go through life and no one hates you, then that means you're not good at anything. The critics I listen to are the ones I can hear when I walk into the arena. When people aren't caring about me anymore, I'll know. Not even Vince deems that: fans deem that. Look at John Cena. People say, "Who does Vince push him so much?" He sells so much (merchandise) and he sells out arenas. It's all about what benefits the business.

    What do you say to those who accuse you of zealously safeguarding your position at the top of the card and refusing to help elevate wrestlers to the main event level?
    All the stars are at a certain level. You can't make someone a star by simply bringing other stars down. That's not how the business works; it's not how it's ever worked. The new stars have to rise on their own. What big star ever laid down for me? That's never been how business is done. Bret Hart didn't put Shawn Michaels over and refused to get beat (at Survivor Series 1997); he wouldn't lose the title. Now, that's not a knock: that's what happened. Look at Steve Austin. I remember when Vince said they were bringing Austin in, and he said, "He'll be a good hand, to help the other guys." Then, they made him The Ringmaster, and gave him those plain trunks to wear. And I was there at King of the Ring 1996 when Austin made himself a star, and then at WrestleMania (XIII) when he really got over. And, remember, he actually lost that match against Bret Hart (at WM XIII), but he got himself over doing it. I've never said, "No" to putting anybody over. But you put C.M. Punk in a 30-minute match with The Undertaker, it's 50-50 all the way and then Punk wins clean, the fans won't accept it. It does nothing for C.M. Punk, and it's also detrimental to the Undertaker.

    You had competitive matches with Jeff Hardy on his journey to the top spot last year. But Booker T/King Booker was not afforded the same equality in his bouts with you at WrestleMania XIX or SummerSlam 2007. Is the amount of offence a wrestler is allowed dependent on his status?
    Yes. Jeff was competitive with me, and I also put Jeff over, eventually. But Jeff was being built up a certain way. He couldn't get there: he was the guy that just couldn't beat me and, the more that happened, the more desperate the fans became for him to do it. So, when he did beat me, it made a much bigger impact. He could have gone out and beat me clean in our first match, but the fans would not have accepted him in the way they have now. We used to say the "marks" were the fans who believed wrestling was all real -- not choreographed -- but now the smart fans, the ones who think they know everything, have became the marks. I know the majority of them don't know the business, they've never been in the business or wrestled in their lives.

    Do you ever take it upon yourself to change match lay-outs or booking plans so your opponents have more offense?
    Yeah. Look, Shawn Michaels and I have just come back as DX and, on our first night back, we got the crap kicked out of us (by Ted DiBiase and Cody Rhodes on the August 17 Raw - Ed). It wasn't Vince who suggested that; it was us. It's about what's right for the business, at the right time. Some people think we're scheming all the time to improve our own situations. But the more people we make stars, the more money we all make, and everyone's happy.

    Your father-in-law is obviously the Chairman of the company you work for. Do these family ties make your working life easier?
    No. It's actually the hardest for me because I can't say, "No" to anything. If Vince says, "I want you to do 'this' show" or "Can you go to 'this' media event", I can't refuse: I have to set an example. He expects more of me.

    What about your wife Stephanie, another powerful figure in WWE: do work disagreements ever accompany you on the trip home?
    Every now and then, there's something: we sometimes bring our petty problems home from work. But as important as this business is in my life, my wife and kids are more important.

    Who do you regard as the next wave of headline-level talent in WWE?
    Well, C.M. Punk is obviously already on his way to becoming a big star. Jack Swagger, I like. Sheamus. Evan Bourne is very good. Kofi Kingston. They are all moving up, but slowly, which is the right way.

    Finally, are you mentoring any WWE wrestler in particular? And in who, do you see the most of the young Triple H?
    The closest to me is probably Sheamus, because we always train together on the road. But I try to watch all the young guys' matches and give them advice, if they want to hear it. If they take advice to heart and really want to improve, them I am wanting to help. As for seeing some of myself in someone? Thats tough. Sheamus just the other day showed up at a show he didn't have to be at. He does whatever he's asked to do without complaining, he goes to every show and is always wanting to work: he does it all, goes above and beyond. That's what I was like.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,206 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    rossie1977 wrote: »
    and why is that?? because you spent so much time over the past 12 years hogging the spotlight that nobody else bar cena could get over :mad:



    oh good god :eek:

    large_gold_star.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,083 ✭✭✭waltersobchak


    Nody wrote: »
    Well he does the one key thing required according to HHH and that is sucking up to HHH, that makes you star material.

    how is he sucking up to hhh, from the sounds of it hes trying to work hard and leave a good impression..wouldnt you do the same thing if you were in his position??


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,520 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    What's the remedy to this: more WWE developmental promotions?
    More developments . . . There are still some little groups out there. You should spend a year or two in as many different places as you can. If you have the desire, if you really want to learn, there are still areas, like Harley Race's company in (Eldon, Missouri) and Mexico, Japan, the U.K. You're going to starve, but it's about if (wrestling) is what you really want to do. It's all such a rush these days: everyone wants to be the next flash in the pan. But that's not a good thing to be, because the flash in the pan burns out so quickly.

    That is the thing to take from the Interview.

    WWE developmental should be ended.

    So many of them look to be cut from the same mould as that is who wwe are hiring with minimal experience.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,640 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Nice Guy


    Had to laugh at this bit:
    What big star ever laid down for me? That's never been how business is done. Bret Hart didn't put Shawn Michaels over and refused to get beat (at Survivor Series 1997); he wouldn't lose the title. Now, that's not a knock: that's what happened.

    Actually Bret DID put Shawn over and DID lose the title to him. Wrestlemania 12 ring any bells, Hunter? The reason it didn't happen at SS 1997 was because Michaels had refused point blank to return the favour and do the honours for Bret.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,235 ✭✭✭✭flahavaj


    LOL, HHH is a legendary WUM. Hero tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,689 ✭✭✭sky88


    tbh before hhh joined dx he never beat many top stars except mick foely unless that what he meant cause after that he preety much beaten everyone


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,380 ✭✭✭geeky


    What a willfully ignorant, self-serving man.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭Driver 8


    You obviously have to expect that being so tied to the WWE he's going to keep to the company line, but there are some glaring examples of selective memory there (when he's asked about his matches with Jeff and Booker, he doesn't even address the latter, as mentioned, he mentions Bret refusing to job to Shawn, neglecting to mention that he had already done so, and that part of his reluctance was due to Shawn's refusal to do the same)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 908 ✭✭✭The Cannibal


    Sheamus will probably be ECW champion within a year then.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,588 ✭✭✭JP Liz


    Sheamus new member of DX :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,477 ✭✭✭Riddle101


    Triple H makes some valid points in the interview. I agree with him about his views on talent. We need more personalities. Every wrestler these days seems like a generic carbon copy of each other. Ted Debiase, Cody Rhodes, Jack Swagger, Evan Bourne and even Kofi Kingston, and that's just Raw's lineup. This is why i'll always like Undertaker, Kane and Mankind's gimmick, because they had a different feel to it. Granted I also likedark type chracters as well. But they really stood out from what the other characters were like. Except for Taker, he was around during the time of the Gobbledy Gooker and Doink the Clown. But i'm just saying, it's better to have a character that stands out, then someone who look like a carbon copy of Randy Orton.

    As for his comments on Sheamus, it does sound like Sheamus is sucking his c*ck, he's going the right way about it:D hitting up the top dog in WWE will certainly get you far. But I don't think Sheamus is doing all that bad. I know it's bad to base my opinion on one account but if what he says is true about Sheamus showing up a shows thta he's not even booked at, then he seems like a good worker who is willing to learn as well.


Advertisement