Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Looking for a VHF Band III Hyperband to UHF Group B combiner

  • 16-10-2009 11:13am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭


    I'm looking for a VHF Band III Hyperband to UHF Group B combiner
    Preferably one with F-Connectors and low loss (<1dB). Good isolation between VHF and UHF.
    It does not need to be in an outdoor enclosure. Power pass through is also not required.
    Most existing VHF-UHF Diplexers only go to ~250MHz on the VHF. I need a VHF hyperband version.

    Does anyone know if such a product exists or where I could get one?
    Thanks in advance.
    PH


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,359 ✭✭✭Antenna


    THe low cost Televes 4048 diplexer will do that just fine (see pics)

    http://www.tvaerials.com/admin/downloads/4045-4047.pdf

    Input 1 (left side) specifies UHF channels 21 to 34 but it will also accept lower than channel 21 i.e. hyperband, VHF Band 3

    Input 2 (right side) accepts 37-69 (UHF groups B and C/D)


    If the output coax is being fed with DC current (to a masthead amplifier) up to one of the inputs, make sure to break off the 'DC pass' link on the other input (the two links are clearly visible on my attached picture). Otherwise (depending on the aerial) you could cause a short circuit on the DC up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭pathogan2008


    Thanks for this Antenna. Great information.

    As long as the UHF1 input on this Televes 4048 can accept VHF from 200-400MHz it should work fine in my application. Is the website you linked to the best place to buy these?

    This particular unit is saddle and clamp. Do you know if there is an alternative with F Connectors?

    I found this combiner also, http://www.qintar.com/html/tv/mmds.htm

    but I think the Televes might be a cheaper and easier to find option. Any others that might work?

    PH


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,359 ✭✭✭Antenna


    Triax have ones with F connectors and quote slightly better specs.

    look at this page 3 of this:
    http://www.triax.co.uk/upload/masthead_09.pdf

    part numbers 370684 or 370685 would suit you

    I do not know who your local supplier would be for Triax.
    Televes is more likely to be stocked by local electrical wholesalers, that's why I linked to that page.

    the combiner you linked to has high insertion loss, forget it. either of the above will perform better


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭pathogan2008


    Hi Antenna.
    Thanks again for the help with this. The Triax 370685 looks like a good fit to combine super & hyper band VHF with Group B-D UHF.
    The fewer dBs I loose on this, the better.
    If I wanted to add an extra layer of complexity to this, and also combine a satellite signal along with the two mentioned above, is there a "1-box" triplexer solution that you could suggest?
    The problem that I've encountered with the triplexers and quadruplexers I've looked at (Triax 370687, Labgear PSF410 etc) is that they cutoff the VHF around 230 MHz. Out of band isolation will kill 300MHz signals.
    If such a triplexer does not exist, then I suppose I could use a "2-box solution" i.e. First combine VHF and UHF, then feed the resultant signal to the input of something like a Triax TMC SAT69 or Triax 340110 combiner or Antiference UDF200DC.
    Your thoughts or suggestions please?

    PH


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 109 ✭✭pathogan2008


    Anyone else have an input on this?
    Looks like I will go with a two-stage solution.

    Thanks.
    PH


  • Advertisement
Advertisement