Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Anyone have any good reliable sources on the development of dance music?

  • 15-10-2009 1:07pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭


    I am looking for something that goes into the actual creation of it. The technologies used, hardware, tools and all that jazz. Not looking for a description whatsoever on any clubscene or movement in Chicago, Berlin or wherever.

    The actual technologies used to create it, how they have developed, etc.

    Thanks in advance.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,531 ✭✭✭jonny68


    Look no further than the famous Roland TB-303:cool:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roland_TB-303
    It was not until the mid- to late-1980s that DJs and electronic musicians in Chicago found a use for the machine in the context of the newly developing house music genre.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,401 ✭✭✭jtsuited


    or actually look further if you want to learn anything.

    don't think there's any real documentation on it.

    the timeline goes...

    808/909/303/various analogue synths/sampler/hardware sequencer setups in the early eighties
    then late 80's early 90's software sequencers replaced hardware sequencers (the Atari ST was very popular) with samplers playing a bigger part than synths.
    then there's a gap when it all gets confusing and people's setups were very very different.
    then computer's became fast enough around the millenium and everything started being done inside the DAW.
    And now we're here with little justification for buying expensive hardware when software is just THAT good.

    that's the short version anywho.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,373 ✭✭✭Executive Steve


    Akai MPC or EMU samplers for the Hardcore / Jungle crew, and a Juno for the basslines; 12 seconds of sampling time, everything arranged in Cubase running on an Amiga and mixed down on mackie desk with guitar FX pedals to **** with the sound some more; 99% of everything is samples cobbled together from utterly random second hand records by lunatic pill heads making tunes in their ma's basement

    2002-ish everyone switches to computer setups, tunes are uniformly crap for the next five years while 99% of the scene gets far too excited about being able to make loud simple blocky tunes; the loudness wars take off in earnest and everything disappears in a sludge of 200hz boosted white-noise "Pendulum" snares

    2007 - present - people start to ease off on the brickwall limiting and explore dynamics again, influenced by the original 2005-2006 dubstep sound, dubstep then collectively downloads Native Instuments "Massive" VST and starts raping the "Brutal Electro" preset with an LFO BPM-synched to the filter cutoff. Dubstep disappears up it's own hole and almost everyone who's actually interesting either goes back to aping 2006 styles or else jumps ship to UK Funky, Garage, Wonky or DnB


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭Jay D


    Cheers lads. Need to get cracking at that this weekend.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 12,781 Mod ✭✭✭✭Zascar


    What exactly are you doing Jay?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭Jay D


    I've to do a 2000 word essay on how technology has made an impact on popular music (but popular can be any genre). Simple enough, not that much words but still, first time doing this sort of thing in some years since last in education.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭FLYNN-DOG


    What course u doing jay and where?Sounds great......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭Jay D


    Sound engineering


  • Subscribers Posts: 8,322 ✭✭✭Scubadevils


    Jay D wrote: »
    Sound engineering

    Fair play Jay, where did you end up doing it? Did the Pulse course give you the bug to take it further?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,738 ✭✭✭Jay D


    Felixdhc wrote: »
    Fair play Jay, where did you end up doing it? Did the Pulse course give you the bug to take it further?

    Yeah they sure did Dave, that was some drug teasing if ever I experienced it :D

    The volume of work is already considerably higher though and not even the full length of that course into this :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 8,322 ✭✭✭Scubadevils


    Jay D wrote: »
    Yeah they sure did Dave, that was some drug teasing if ever I experienced it :D

    The volume of work is already considerably higher though and not even the full length of that course into this :confused:

    Yeah I'd say so, I loved those two months or whatever the intro course consisted of, would have loved to go on and do further but work and family doesn't leave much time at the moment!

    I can imagine its a lot more intense alright, best way though... enjoy it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16 eoincody




Advertisement