Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

should journalist Stephen Farrel have been rescued at the cost of a child's life?

  • 12-09-2009 5:58pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 259 ✭✭


    The so called daring rescue of journalist Stephen Farrell is been protrayed as another great plucked from the jaws of death storyline by the british army with unfortunately a british soldier and an interpreter Sultan Munadi also killed - implicitly by the Taliban.But ofcourse, things are far from been the usual 'heros' saving the world from terrorism stuff.
    Appearentl according to TIME magazine's website " It is unclear whether Sultan Munadi was shot by his British rescuers or by the Taliban. Locals tell TIME that a woman and child in the house were killed along with a Taliban commander named Baz. " Now you have it,, a woman and child were killed, maybe it was the rescuers or the Taliban member Baz ( which seems unlikely to me as the woman and child were in the house with him ) - and hardly a word in the news etc about it.

    A Britsh combatant is killed by an Afghan combatant -and he and his fellow chums are the ' heros' while the child and woman are ignored. Why do people make excuses for the murdering scum ?


    http://www.time.com/time/world/artic...?xid=rss-world


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    failed link ther boss

    The page you've requested has been moved or taken off the site.
    We apologize for the inconvenience.


    There are several ways you can find the information you need:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    News report had it that negotiations were underway to free him before the rescue attempt .Sounds like another cock up


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 259 ✭✭DublinDes


    Latchy wrote: »
    News report had it that negotiations were underway to free him before the rescue attempt .Sounds like another cock up
    Yes indeed Latchy, but sure it couldn't be the mighty British army could it ?? Look at this report from Al Jazzeera, sounds like the militarily infallible SAS to me " Mohammad Sami Yowar, a spokesman for the Kunduz governor, said British special forces had dropped down from helicopters on to the house where the two journalists were being kept. " Naturally of course we'll have the usual crowd on BSing that this was a Para mission, the Fog of War, Taliban using human sheilds. How a woman cowering in a room with a bay can be ' mistaken ' for a terrorist excuse is beyond any any decent human being - unless of course your a British army " our boys are right even when their wrong " brigade etc



    http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia/2009/09/20099974850934601.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 259 ✭✭DublinDes


    Latchy wrote: »
    News report had it that negotiations were underway to free him before the rescue attempt .Sounds like another cock up
    According to TIME - " Negotiators were "optimistic" that Farrell and Munadi would be freed within days, without payment of a ransom. Hostage-taking is a long-standing Afghan practice and almost always ends with captives being freed in exchange for money after days or weeks of haggling. But in this case, sources tell TIME, the senior Taliban commanders of Kunduz were "acting reasonably" and seemed willing to hand the reporter and his aide over without a payoff. "

    But of course the SAS/Paras?brits wanted to make a big ' rescue ' Bullsh!t out of it - and the y f**ked up of course and we'd have endless movies, docementery's/books etc about the magnificant SAS/PAras/Britsh army for ever and ever and ever :rolleyes:


    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1921263,00.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,191 ✭✭✭✭Latchy


    DublinDes wrote: »
    But of course the SAS/Paras?brits wanted to make a big ' rescue ' Bullsh!t out of it - and the y f**ked up of course and we'd have endless movies, docementery's/books etc about the magnificant SAS/PAras/Britsh army for ever and ever and ever :rolleyes:
    Agreed , i never bought into the 'our boys over there crap ' although the average brit soldier probaly sees through all the hype/propaganda as much as anybody ,it's just that they play along with the game of soldiering ,if only to make their own situation , both in the war zone and at home more comfortable .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,533 ✭✭✭iceage


    I think you'll find that the general concensus is that the raid to rescue said journo wasn't worth it. You must agree though that if this guy hadn't decided to go there in the first place none of this would have happened now would it.

    The death of his collegue Sultan Munadi and the lose of an innocent mother and child is the tragedy, the Soldiers involved in the raid including the one who died knew the risks.

    As an afterthought, Stephen Farrell travels on a dual British/Irish passport. Anyone know where he comes from?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,798 ✭✭✭Local-womanizer


    The Taliban landed at this village and demanded to be let into the houses with the hostages.It is very possible that the Taliban could have killed the women and child.

    If the rescue force killed the women and child I'am sure it wouldent have been on purpose,just an unfortunate consequence of war.

    I have heard some anaylists say that the main mission was the death or capture of a taliban leader,the hostages were also a priority but the coalition were always going to attack/rescue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,497 ✭✭✭Poccington


    This thread is pointless.

    If you want to do a bit of Brit bashing, go over to politics.ie

    Don't like it? Jog on to Feedback.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement