Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The Mad Caddies C&C

  • 26-08-2009 1:46am
    #1
    Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    3857118113_995e91641a.jpg

    3857143593_ba12ec8a2d.jpg

    3857130311_ea89265fdf.jpg

    3857804732_dabdee5c18.jpg

    3857924722_d7bf3e5cb1.jpg

    3857906152_084d7429c3.jpg


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭iamnothim


    i was in at this too, but only for the support band, then i took off. i'll post a few of those shots later when i've got em off the camera. your shots look great, very clear considering the complete and utter lack of light in there. particularly like the 3rd last one


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    iamnothim wrote: »
    i was in at this too, but only for the support band, then i took off. i'll post a few of those shots later when i've got em off the camera. your shots look great, very clear considering the complete and utter lack of light in there. particularly like the 3rd last one

    ah i think i saw ya,canin and lots of zoom, you were working from the crowd a bit. a 35 mm and 50mm was all i took given the gig, fairly limited me. got thrown around big time during the cadies, camera nearly smashed a few time, damn lack of pit


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭iamnothim


    yeah, it was calm enough for the upgrades. that 70-200 was feckin useless to be honest, think i got one keepable photo on it. 50 1.4 and 50 1.8 was all i really used (my 50 1.4 is broken and wont focus closer than 3m so have to swap back to an old 1.8 for closer shots)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,840 ✭✭✭Trev M


    iamnothim wrote: »
    yeah, it was calm enough for the upgrades. that 70-200 was feckin useless to be honest, think i got one keepable photo on it. 50 1.4 and 50 1.8 was all i really used (my 50 1.4 is broken and wont focus closer than 3m so have to swap back to an old 1.8 for closer shots)

    Take it your 70-200 is the F/4 version?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    Trev M wrote: »
    Take it your 70-200 is the F/4 version?

    i think it was white...

    so not being a canon head... that means 2.8 usually no?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 325 ✭✭iamnothim


    no, both the f/4 and the f/2.8 are white. the 2.8 is a lot bigger though.

    mine is the 2.8 version (without IS). It still wasnt fast enough. I was averaging around 1/30 to 1/50 shutter speed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,250 ✭✭✭pixbyjohn


    iamnothim wrote: »
    no, both the f/4 and the f/2.8 are white. the 2.8 is a lot bigger though.

    mine is the 2.8 version (without IS). It still wasnt fast enough. I was averaging around 1/30 to 1/50 shutter speed.

    What ISO settings did you use


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,686 Mod ✭✭✭✭melekalikimaka


    iamnothim wrote: »
    no, both the f/4 and the f/2.8 are white. the 2.8 is a lot bigger though.

    mine is the 2.8 version (without IS). It still wasnt fast enough. I was averaging around 1/30 to 1/50 shutter speed.

    i was shooting f2 @ bout 1/125th - 1/180th and geting decent light in, tho it was 1600iso, noisey as ****. gonna batch them through noise ninja once it installs.


Advertisement