Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Handgun subtitutions??

  • 07-08-2009 4:37pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭


    Does anyone know if we will be able to change a handgun which is currently licenced.
    There is a section on the new form which allows this but does it refer to handguns or would a change of handgun be a new application.
    The new bill bans all new handguns,but is that for first timers or everyone.
    I want to change mine and realise that a dealer might not be able to sell it on so might have to get it destroyed or deactivated,or even converted to a .22 rimfire,which is easily done.
    Big question is will the new bill allow for this????


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,711 ✭✭✭fat-tony


    I take it your current pistol is restricted?
    As I read it the new Acts would not allow you to make an application for a new restricted pistol, but you could apply for an unrestricted pistol, while retaining your restricted one. The guidelines (which we are all waiting on) should make it clearer how a substitution would work in practice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    All pistols are restricted? Some are prohibited?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 178 ✭✭derek_g34


    You'll have no problem making a substitution. But you will have a problem finding a buyer for your gun (unless of course it's something which is well sought after i.e. CZ 75 TS etc) Your other problem is going to be that there are no more centre fire pistols coming into the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    Bananaman wrote: »
    All pistols are restricted?
    Definitely not...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,711 ✭✭✭fat-tony


    Bananaman wrote: »
    All pistols are restricted? Some are prohibited?
    Are those meant to be questions? Are you not sure?
    Pistols used in Olympic competition have not been restricted by the Minister. Other pistols are restricted to their current owners. Any firearms prohibited have always been prohibited in the Firearms Acts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭BornToKill


    derek_g34 wrote: »
    You'll have no problem making a substitution.

    I wouldn't agree that that's the case. The new act says you are only allowed a new cert for:

    'a short firearm for which the applicant for the firearm certificate held a firearm certificate on or before 19 November 2008.'

    I'd believe that means the firearm you had licensed last year - hence no substitutions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,711 ✭✭✭fat-tony


    fat-tony wrote: »
    Other pistols are restricted to their current owners.
    Agreed BTK


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    BornToKill wrote: »
    I wouldn't agree that that's the case. The new act says you are only allowed a new cert for:

    'a short firearm for which the applicant for the firearm certificate held a firearm certificate on or before 19 November 2008.'

    I'd believe that means the firearm you had licensed last year - hence no substitutions.
    I've some difficulty parsing and analysing that one BTK. The section needs to be read together for the full sense and as such it would read.
    As and from the date of commencement of this section, no application for a firearm certificate in respect of a short firearm shall be considered by an issuing person other than for a short firearm for which the applicant for the firearm certificate held a firearm certificate on or before 19 November 2008.
    It reads a bit different when put like that or does it? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    rrpc wrote: »
    It reads a bit different when put like that or does it? :confused:
    Not really, but then I'm a pessimist...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    Sparks wrote: »
    Not really, but then I'm a pessimist...
    Part of the cure is acknowledging the condition :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,038 ✭✭✭✭Sparks


    rrpc wrote: »
    Part of the cure is acknowledging the condition :D
    To quote Leonard Cohen: "I don't consider myself a pessimist. I think of a pessimist as someone who is waiting for it to rain. And I feel soaked to the skin."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,711 ✭✭✭fat-tony


    This is the full text of the relevant section:

    3D.—(1) As and from the date of commencement of this section, no application
    for a firearm certificate in respect of a short firearm shall be considered by an
    issuing person other than for—
    (a) a device capable of discharging blank ammunition and to be used as a
    starting gun or blank firing gun;
    (b) a short firearm of a type specified at paragraph 4(2)(e) of the Firearms
    (Restricted Firearms and Ammunition) Order 2008 (S.I. No. 21 of 2008) and
    designed for use as so specified;
    (c) a short firearm for which the applicant for the firearm certificate held a
    firearm certificate on or before 19 November 2008.

    RRPC - Your interpretation of para. (c) is that any firearms cert. holder (held prior to 19/11/08) can apply for a restricted short fiream?

    My interpretation is that the reference is to the holder of the certificate, "renewing" the same certificate - not applying for one for a new gun.

    :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭BornToKill


    fat-tony wrote: »
    Agreed BTK

    OK F-T, though you've quoted yourself there and not me.:)
    rrpc wrote: »
    It reads a bit different when put like that or does it? :confused:

    I won't argue it because I just don't know. I think it means you have to have had that specific handgun licensed last year but an alternative interpretation would be that you could apply for a cert if you had that type of gun licensed previously. I lean to the former but, as I said, I just don't know.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,711 ✭✭✭fat-tony


    Yeh I know I quoted a section of my reply to B'man, where I essentially said that restricted pistols were restricted to their current owners.

    Like you, I lean to the interpretation that paragraph (c) means you can't substitute - you're stuck with existing firearm. But hey - we await the guidelines:confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,053 ✭✭✭BornToKill


    Thanks - gotcha now. Yes, we'll see soon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭daveob007


    i suppose it would be better to wait for the guidelines to figure it out,
    Big question is that if i can replace my pistol (which is a glock) and could be banned in the future can i sell it at all,,don't want to scrap it either because it cost too much so can i get it deactivated and keep it as a display or collectors gun???
    i could even get a .22 rimfire conversion kit for it but not sure if it will fall into the category of olympic class?????????????
    confused..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    daveob007 wrote: »
    i suppose it would be better to wait for the guidelines to figure it out,
    Big question is that if i can replace my pistol (which is a glock) and could be banned in the future can i sell it at all,,don't want to scrap it either because it cost too much so can i get it deactivated and keep it as a display or collectors gun???
    i could even get a .22 rimfire conversion kit for it but not sure if it will fall into the category of olympic class?????????????
    confused..
    Don't change anything untill you have to. You hold a centre fire pistol licence before 19/11/08 and therefore are one of those entitled to have your application 'considered'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭daveob007


    rrpc wrote: »
    Don't change anything untill you have to. You hold a centre fire pistol licence before 19/11/08 and therefore are one of those entitled to have your application 'considered'.
    have it for a year so will apply anyway,
    just interested in changing for a proper competition target gun.
    Was advised to try and get rid of the g17. though.
    We all know that a lot of gardai do not like these and would prefer if we dont have them,,thats all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    daveob007 wrote: »
    have it for a year so will apply anyway,
    just interested in changing for a proper competition target gun.
    Was advised to try and get rid of the g17. though.
    We all know that a lot of gardai do not like these and would prefer if we dont have them,,thats all.
    Indeed. But it's unclear as to whether you'll get another centre-fire pistol other than the one you currently hold. We've been discussing this here and can't come to a conclusion as it's just too vague. If they refuse you a licence for the G17, you can decide what to do at that point, but I wouldn't be giving up straight away if I was competing regularly and using it all the time.

    The guidelines will help, but I'm not sure how much :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭daveob007


    rrpc wrote: »
    Indeed. But it's unclear as to whether you'll get another centre-fire pistol other than the one you currently hold. We've been discussing this here and can't come to a conclusion as it's just too vague. If they refuse you a licence for the G17, you can decide what to do at that point, but I wouldn't be giving up straight away if I was competing regularly and using it all the time.

    The guidelines will help, but I'm not sure how much :confused:
    we hope they will anyway.
    i will be applying for a .22 anyway soon as we get the info on them.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 416 ✭✭G17


    daveob007 wrote: »
    have it for a year so will apply anyway,
    just interested in changing for a proper competition target gun.

    I consider mine a proper competition gun. I shoot bullseye well. I don't remember having an embarrassing score at PPC when I did it for the first time. I shoot it one handed.

    The guy who owned it before me bought a 210 and still can't hit anything. I'm a big Austrian unmentionable fan (on my third one) and it's not really helpful when people post on a public forum that one type of firearm or another isn't a competition gun.

    If people aren't competitive with their Austrians, please don't blame the gun (not a dig at you personally daveob007).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    I also own an Austrian unmentionable (34) and I have a good sized box of medals to prove it is well competitive in a whole range of sports.

    I have seen plenty of lads go out and spend 1000's on 'superior' pistols only to have me beat them.

    Granted - 50 metre precision is not my strong point but that is only because I have not done any practice in it - just the occasional comepetition.

    That said - the first time I took a shot at 50 metres I aimed dead centre and I got an X - needless to say I unloaded, put it away and lived on the that story for a few weeks before I tried it again.

    B'Man

    PS: I also will be seeking a .22 once the dust has settled.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 416 ✭✭G17


    Bananaman wrote: »
    That said - the first time I took a shot at 50 metres I aimed dead centre and I got an X - needless to say I unloaded, put it away and lived on the that story for a few weeks before I tried it again.

    Probably best! :D
    PS: I also will be seeking a .22 once the dust has settled.

    Do.

    I'd a 9 then a .22 and a 177 IZH on the way, some will think I'm progressing some will think I'm wussing. Answers on a €20 to........ :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    G17 wrote: »
    I'd a 9 then a .22 and a 177 IZH on the way, some will think I'm progressing some will think I'm wussing. Answers on a €20 to........ :D
    The IZH also doubles as a chest expander, so it'll save you money on your gym sub. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 416 ✭✭G17


    rrpc wrote: »
    The IZH also doubles as a chest expander, so it'll save you money on your gym sub. ;)

    Blasting me pecs and consistent 10.7s, bonus!! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Bananaman


    While I may be seeking a .22 in the future I have no intention of giving up any of the centrefire disciplines I have shot so far.

    There are always more nickel plated sissy pistols out there to be beaten by the trusty Glock.

    B'Man


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,244 ✭✭✭rrpc


    G17 wrote: »
    Blasting me pecs and consistent 10.7s, bonus!! :D
    Only 10.7's? ;)

    You've actually made a good choice there G17. I'm regretting that I didn't buy an air pistol when I was starting off because it's so much more useful for training than even a .22.

    Cost of ammo is negligible, targets likewise and as far as ranges go, well 10m is so easy to find anywhere.

    Generally the weight is about the same (or in the case of the IZH; heavier), the only difference is the trigger weight being lighter, but not having good trigger control shows up very quickly at that range.

    All in all, the air pistol is probably one of the best training tools out there and everyone interested in pistol shooting should have one, no matter what else they have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭daveob007


    G17 wrote: »
    I consider mine a proper competition gun. I shoot bullseye well. I don't remember having an embarrassing score at PPC when I did it for the first time. I shoot it one handed.

    The guy who owned it before me bought a 210 and still can't hit anything. I'm a big Austrian unmentionable fan (on my third one) and it's not really helpful when people post on a public forum that one type of firearm or another isn't a competition gun.

    If people aren't competitive with their Austrians, please don't blame the gun (not a dig at you personally daveob007).

    fair enough on that,just that i was advised to try and get something else,
    i might just keep it untill told otherwise cos i actually like it and it never jams or misfires (important in competition).
    I used a laser bore sighter last week to adjust the sights and it made a big difference 6 bulls out of 10 shots at 25 yards.
    is that competition material??
    anyway just posted this thread to see if subs will be allowed.


Advertisement