site to play .50/1 NL ??

prunch

just wondering where do you guys think is the best place to play at these limits, as in where are the most fish? cheers

FlushPoker.ie

any iPoker site....PaddyPower WilliamHill etc....

Also try and learn PLO when i was grinding up the roll the low limit PLO tables were and remain very profitable and full of fish making very basic mistakes

sickpuppy

Im on pokerstars at the moment 160000players online if you cant find fish there ya may give up.

FlushPoker.ie

sickpuppy wrote: »

Im on pokerstars at the moment 160000players online if you cant find fish there ya may give up.

LOL very true...can be some very good regs too tho...just look out for french ppl other than elky

cardshark202

elky is canadian

phantom_lord

elky is a freak and a weird dude imo

http://tv.de.pokernews.com/Bertrand+'Elky'+Grosspellier/29174749001

plus i'm pretty sure he's french.

Grafter

cardshark202 wrote: »

elky is canadian

Oh no he's not

corkie123

hes french

FlushPoker.ie

Getting Off Topic Now:

Main Points
- Elky Good and Either French or Canadian...but sick sick player
- PLO low to mid stakes good option for grinding and full of weak bad players
- Pokeer is good :-)

Tight Ted

phantom_lord wrote: »

elky is a freak and a weird dude imo

http://tv.de.pokernews.com/Bertrand+'Elky'+Grosspellier/29174749001

plus i'm pretty sure he's french.

That he is, but he comes across pretty normal in that particular vid.

ianmc38

Speaking from a neutral perspective, id say ipoker is amongst the worst places to play .50/1 right now.

Blacktie.

Don't play get out while you can!!!

prunch

Blacktie. wrote: »

Don't play get out while you can!!!

seriously??

Tony_Montana

defo ipoker

Jesus Wept

Tony_Montana wrote: »

defo ipoker

About 10 active tables, some 6 handed, some 10, biggest average pot is $18, average i about $12.

Is it really tight?

Mr.Plough

Ipoker is full of nits living off rb and bonuses, last time I checked anyway.

Stars is soft, even the regs usually play 20/15 ish and are pretty exploitable. No rb though.

Havn't played 100nl on FT but I would guess it's better than ipoker mainly due to traffic and rb is a plus.

RoadSweeper

Stars and FT has loads of fish still, plus ridiculous good software.

The Improver

No more fish on ipoker. FACT

Wreck

The Improver wrote: »

No more fish on ipoker. FACT

I'm still there, and I'm a total fish.

ianmc38

Boss/Ongame have good traffic and alot softer than Ipoker, also good rb. Stars/FTP are the best software wise.

OilBeefHooked2

The Improver wrote: »

No more fish on ipoker. FACT

Your still playing there Keith aren't ya?!

Small Change

This ipoker thing confuses me TBH...

There appears to be a general consensus that ipoker is mostly populated with multitabling rakeback nits.

Given that, relatively speaking, ipoker has one of the poorest "rakeback"/VIP structures available and relatively tough games, what is the attraction for these types of players??

Are they all on legacy deals from previous networks or am I missing someting in terms of the attraction?

premierstone

Fish = badbeats

The Improver

david-k wrote: »

Your still playing there Keith aren't ya?!

ya, mr kerins, but for other reasons or else i'd be gone fishing!!!!

Tony_Montana

Wreck wrote: »

I'm still there, and I'm a total fish.

Same here

Small Change wrote: »

This ipoker thing confuses me TBH...

There appears to be a general consensus that ipoker is mostly populated with multitabling rakeback nits.

Given that, relatively speaking, ipoker has one of the poorest "rakeback"/VIP structures available and relatively tough games, what is the attraction for these types of players??

Are they all on legacy deals from previous networks or am I missing someting in terms of the attraction?

100% of your rake. I cant see how anyone cannot be on it.

cooker3

Small Change wrote: »

This ipoker thing confuses me TBH...

There appears to be a general consensus that ipoker is mostly populated with multitabling rakeback nits.

Given that, relatively speaking, ipoker has one of the poorest "rakeback"/VIP structures available and relatively tough games, what is the attraction for these types of players??

Are they all on legacy deals from previous networks or am I missing someting in terms of the attraction?

Ipoker certainly doesn't have the worst rb deal. Pretty much the opposite.

Jesus Wept

Tony_Montana wrote: »

100% of your rake. I cant see how anyone cannot be on it.

?

jimbling

Right, I'm currently on iPoker and came across this thread. I haven't played a few months but put in 9k+ hands in the last two days 9 tabling .25/.50. The games definitely aren't ridiculously soft or anything, but they're easily beatable and the good rb deal makes me feel all warm and fussy inside.

I do want to "move up levels" though, and if they're going to get much much tougher then I would consider the move.
So, where to?

Stars is a no go for me. Firstly because of a lack of rb and secondly because that's where I play my tourneys and I don't want to mix the two.

FT, I have always heard that cash games where tough there. Is that no longer the case?

Ongame/Boss. Ian, you mention these, is there really enough traffic to satisfy 9 tabling at stakes .25/.50 to 1/2? Even during the day? If so, will you pm me rb info etc.

Any other options for a multi tabling nit wannabe?

ianmc38

Boss has 35-40 tables at .25/.50 right now. Ongame Im not sure but i suspect it has the same. Definitely more than enough to 9 table on one site, let alone both!

jimbling

ianmc38 wrote: »

Boss has 35-40 tables at .25/.50 right now. Ongame Im not sure but i suspect it has the same. Definitely more than enough to 9 table on one site, let alone both!

Cheers Ian. I'll download both in a while and take a look, see how they look/feel. Whats the story with the software? Many crashes / network problems etc? Surely they're better than iPoker :rolleyes:

jimbling

jimbling wrote: »

Cheers Ian. I'll download both in a while and take a look, see how they look/feel. Whats the story with the software? Many crashes / network problems etc? Surely they're better than iPoker :rolleyes:

Just read some bad things about multi-tabling on Boss. I'll have a look at ongame later.

RoadSweeper

On game is 5 max and the software is meh
Is v fast and you'll get serious hand per hour, but i think modifications are best for the software.

zuutroy

Ongame is eyegougingly awful to multitable even after modding.

max_power

Is there much PLO traffic on ongame/boss at microstakes up to .50/1?

The Snapper

jimbling wrote: »

Just read some bad things about multi-tabling on Boss. I'll have a look at ongame later.

Link ?

imho, software is pretty poor, if you can 9 table their software I'd be well impressed. I'd love to watch someone do that ( head hurts just thinking about it:( )

Ace2007

software on boss isn't the best and i seem to time out on tables alot, i also found the different currencies a bit of a pain, as PT calculate everything in dollars... currencies are DOLLAR, EURO and TRY.

ianmc38

I think the games on both the networks are worth giving up the few luxuries for. It's going to be nigh on impossible to find that many good games on Ipoker these days.

max_power PLO action on Boss is minimal in mid and high stakes. There are about 15-20 games running now between .05/.10 and .50/1. During peak hours I'm sure this number is bigger.

jimbling, maybe you should give the Cereus network a try. Supposedly the games are very good there. Theyre the 5th busiest network right now as well according to Pokerscout so Im sure they have a ton of SSNL traffic.

Loyalty scheme is going to be less than what you get on the Euro networks, but can still get over 50 when bonuses etc are taken into account.