Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

MTL Dublin, Dock workers dispute

  • 15-07-2009 9:27pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6


    Peel ports, a multi billion pound company from Britain bought MTL ( marine terminals limited ) in south bank quay, Dublin, 2 years ago. MTL is probably the largest lo lo company in Ireland and the most profitable. When Peel ports took over they immediately started to implement changes by making management redundant. They then brought in their own management from their terminal in Belfast, he was accompanied by 24 hour security, 2 men on him at all times. These "security" are believed to be ex-British army special forces. Once Peel had established total control of the MTL, they set about doing things their way. They refused to engage in talks with the union SIPTU and went straight for the kill on the workforce, axeing 13 machine/crane operatives and one cleaner in one fowl swoop, inviting them in for an appeal which was farcical to say the least as these workers were handpicked by management, regardless of how good or bad they were at their jobs. The remaining machine/crane men were offered new contracts with a minnimum 18% pay cut and terrible terms and conditions that would force them to cut all ties with the union and leave them vulnerable to be made redundant or sacked. With the union fighting to get the 13 men and one woman reinstated the company went ahead and issued another 9 machine/crane operators with letter's of redundancy which they hope to have implemented by 10th August, with absolutely no negotiating or contact with SIPTU from MTL there was only one option left for the dock workers left to take, "all out strike". They have been on strike since 3rd of July, with only 6 SCABS passing the picket and the rest of the work being done by more SCABS from other ports owned by Peel, Mersey docks, Clyde port and Belfast to name a few. The strike at MTL has got little or no media coverage due to the fact that the electricians strike happened at the same time and overshadowed it.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Ill take 60k a year any day. Been on a three day week for six months. Threatned and abused at thr gate. Read the news you sheep.......SIPTU is dead


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13 Joeyjay


    it's bloody disgraceful!!!!!!!!! hopefully the company will see sense......... please show your support


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭gerrycollins


    nothing wrong there.

    A company does not have to reconise a union.

    Its their company which can issue new contracts to existing employees.

    its a recession jobs are been lost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 theroadahead


    It's bully boy tactics, MTL are a thriving company making massive profit's and now they're using the recession as an excuse to axe staff and bring in cheap labour, this recession is a capitalist companies dream!
    Also they are sending ships that they own to other terminals in Dublin port to make the MTL yard look quiter and emptier than it actualy is, as soon as they've got enough people gone then they will bring them back, it's disgusting!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    nothing wrong there.

    A company does not have to reconise a union.

    Its their company which can issue new contracts to existing employees.

    its a recession jobs are been lost.

    Yes you are right but if you knew the facts you would know that the company under TUPE would have to keep to the original agreements which state clearly that all negotiations have to go through the union so your point is void there.

    Also yes companies can issue new contracts but BY LAW they have to negotiate with the individual if not through the union about any changes in the terms and conditions of your employment so again your point is void here.

    Finally yes the union accepted that redundancies would be needed and again under TUPE the company had to negotiate all redundancies through the union which again they did not do so strike three to you, all your points are void!

    If you are going to make comments on this dispute please get all your facts straight first as it is people like you who are making this more difficult for the people who are out on the picket!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    I drive a crane in Portroe and my basic pay is nearly half of whats on offer in MTL. Having said that I am glad to have any Job at all. Thats after working for 20 years in the docks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    It's bully boy tactics, MTL are a thriving company making massive profit's and now they're using the recession as an excuse to axe staff and bring in cheap labour, this recession is a capitalist companies dream!


    agree 100% these english companies come over and speak down to you as if your dirt i had this happen to me in my last company they were saying this is how we do things in england and i woukd piont out that there operating in ireland.
    and i have since heard that they imposed a 10% wage cut on their drivers while posting pretax profits of 25 million


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    mtldockers wrote: »
    Yes you are right but if you knew the facts you would know that the company under TUPE would have to keep to the original agreements which state clearly that all negotiations have to go through the union so your point is void there.
    I've no idea what TUPE is, so could you explain it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 theroadahead


    TUPE stands for the "Transfer of undertakings, protection of employees" Google it and you will find out all you need to know, Cheers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    TUPE stands for the "Transfer of undertakings, protection of employees" Google it and you will find out all you need to know, Cheers.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_of_Undertakings_(Protection_of_Employment)_Regulations_2006

    this explains it here


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    I have been in and out of MTL over the past 4 or 5 years. There is a whole other side to this argument. I earn half the wage working double the hours of the offer reported to be on the table. What angers me is the failure to mention a lot of underhand goings on within this port in the past. Over the past three weeks we have recieved a much better service with no damage or "preferential treatment" which was common place on a daily basis.

    Remember!! There are two sides to every story, I don't wan't to see anyone losing their jobs. Keep an open mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,982 ✭✭✭kravmaga


    Peel ports, a multi billion pound company from Britain bought MTL ( marine terminals limited ) in south bank quay, Dublin, 2 years ago. MTL is probably the largest lo lo company in Ireland and the most profitable. When Peel ports took over they immediately started to implement changes by making management redundant. They then brought in their own management from their terminal in Belfast, he was accompanied by 24 hour security, 2 men on him at all times. These "security" are believed to be ex-British army special forces. Once Peel had established total control of the MTL, they set about doing things their way. They refused to engage in talks with the union SIPTU and went straight for the kill on the workforce, axeing 13 machine/crane operatives and one cleaner in one fowl swoop, inviting them in for an appeal which was farcical to say the least as these workers were handpicked by management, regardless of how good or bad they were at their jobs. The remaining machine/crane men were offered new contracts with a minnimum 18% pay cut and terrible terms and conditions that would force them to cut all ties with the union and leave them vulnerable to be made redundant or sacked. With the union fighting to get the 13 men and one woman reinstated the company went ahead and issued another 9 machine/crane operators with letter's of redundancy which they hope to have implemented by 10th August, with absolutely no negotiating or contact with SIPTU from MTL there was only one option left for the dock workers left to take, "all out strike". They have been on strike since 3rd of July, with only 6 SCABS passing the picket and the rest of the work being done by more SCABS from other ports owned by Peel, Mersey docks, Clyde port and Belfast to name a few. The strike at MTL has got little or no media coverage due to the fact that the electricians strike happened at the same time and overshadowed it.

    Why dont you contact the national newspapers for media attention.
    I am sure some journalist worth his weight would be interested in this story.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    Why dont you contact the national newspapers for media attention.
    I am sure some journalist worth his weight would be interested in this story.

    Believe me they all know! We have contacted them all but got little or no response.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 theroadahead


    Thanks for the suggestion blue eyed boy, but as MTL Dockers has said, they all know. The Irish Times has published a few articles on it, if you wanna know more about our issues, links to the newspaper articles or a background into Peel ports log onto www.mtldockers.com .
    "Haulier", I dont know where your getting your information from as we werent offered 60k, even if we were we could'nt have signed those contracts as the t&c's in them were outrageous and would've forced us to sever our tie's with the union and leave us open to be made redundant, in fact it actually says in the contract that if they are not busy they can make you redundant at any time!
    We are all reasonable people on strike, all we want is for Peel ports to negotiate with the union, surely thats not too much to ask in this day and age????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭gerrycollins


    mtldockers wrote: »
    Yes you are right but if you knew the facts you would know that the company under TUPE would have to keep to the original agreements which state clearly that all negotiations have to go through the union so your point is void there.

    Also yes companies can issue new contracts but BY LAW they have to negotiate with the individual if not through the union about any changes in the terms and conditions of your employment so again your point is void here.

    Finally yes the union accepted that redundancies would be needed and again under TUPE the company had to negotiate all redundancies through the union which again they did not do so strike three to you, all your points are void!

    If you are going to make comments on this dispute please get all your facts straight first as it is people like you who are making this more difficult for the people who are out on the picket!!

    is TUPE in irish law yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,747 ✭✭✭mdebets


    is TUPE in irish law yet?
    It's Irish Law since 2003. See here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    is TUPE in irish law yet?

    Yes it has been for quite some time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Haulier wrote: »
    I have been in and out of MTL over the past 4 or 5 years. There is a whole other side to this argument. I earn half the wage working double the hours of the offer reported to be on the table. What angers me is the failure to mention a lot of underhand goings on within this port in the past. Over the past three weeks we have recieved a much better service with no damage or "preferential treatment" which was common place on a daily basis.

    Remember!! There are two sides to every story, I don't wan't to see anyone losing their jobs. Keep an open mind.


    Yes there are 2 sides to every story but i know which side your on, when did people stop supporting a workers right to proper working conditions, proper pay (we do still live in RIP OFF IRELAND) this is were Peel Ports are telling the drivers a pack of lies, its not about the money its not only about the redundancies its about how a company as huge as Peel Ports feel they can use their bullying tactics and force people to signing contracts agreeing to terms and conditions that have not been negotiated with a "take it or Leave it" attitude also should you sign the contract you are not safe either they also reserve the right to change it at any time, its already happening up north they signed the contract a few months ago and agreed to a shift pattern which is completely unsocialable to people with families some men working most weekends and "on Call " for the rest and then told recently that no that does not suit peel ports we have to change it again and this is only one of the problems that exist there are many more like these and thats without even touching the pay cuts or redundancies. People need to realise that these companies are using the recession to frighten their staff with job losses therefore people are afraid to stand up for their rights

    Listen to your ancestors!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    The employers cannot carry on industry nor accumulate profits if they have not got the good will of the workers or their acquiescence in carrying on such industry.
    "James Larkin "

    "Connolly Urges Strikers to Stand Firm"
    Contributors: GD, TOR.




    Introduction. Connolly was imprisoned for riotous conduct during the strike and met many people who had been jailed for membership of the Irish Transport and General Workers’ Union, which only increased support for the Union. He discusses strikers’ attitudes to the lockout, praised their determination to remain on strike for as long as necessary, and encouraged them to stand firm until the end. Connolly described the lockout as a struggle for rights, and a battle for survival, in which workers chose to face hardship, hunger, and imprisonment, in the hope that success would bring long term benefits: better wages, and better working conditions. He praised those who united in the sympathetic strike, and remarked that if their actions caused chaos, and brought all business to a standstill, then it might achieve their goals, and discourage employers from mistreating their workers. To this end, Connolly argued that unions must put all their energy and money into winning the strike to protect the rights of each individual, the ideal for a socialist society. Ultimately, he hoped that all–out industrial conflict would change the nature of politics by dividing society into workers and employers, and in the event of workers’ victory, lay the foundation for a reorganisation of society along socialist lines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭gerrycollins


    mtldockers wrote: »
    Yes it has been for quite some time.

    Thank you didnt have time to look it up this morning had to dash off.

    interesting stuff, maybe they are just rocking the boat considering some people might not do anything and are thankful they still have a job.

    they are picking a fight really up to you guys to fight back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    Thank you didnt have time to look it up this morning had to dash off.

    interesting stuff, maybe they are just rocking the boat considering some people might not do anything and are thankful they still have a job.

    they are picking a fight really up to you guys to fight back.

    rock the boat is a bit of an understatement, they have completely ignored the industrial relations process we have here as when they bought out Liverpool, Glasgow and Belfast docks they walked all over the unions and dockers there and got what they wanted. We are not going to let that happen to us!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭gerrycollins


    mtldockers wrote: »
    rock the boat is a bit of an understatement, they have completely ignored the industrial relations process we have here as when they bought out Liverpool, Glasgow and Belfast docks they walked all over the unions and dockers there and got what they wanted. We are not going to let that happen to us!!

    Personally i detest unions but i cannot stand anyone taking working people for granted good luck in your fight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,554 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    Personally i detest unions but i cannot stand anyone taking working people for granted good luck in your fight

    they are a nescecery evil i have seen people hide behind them as they where lasy f**kers and i have seen people who work and dont cause hassle in the company need them due to mgmt bullying


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Seems 'haulier' has more than a chip on his shoulder about dock workers..
    Sure why dont we all roll over and take what's being dished out - "because there's a recession on" Maybe thats what has your 'proffession' where it is now - under cutting each other for years working outside hours for extra pay etc etc...Taco graph's being ignored.. Best of luck to you at MTL....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    I drive a crane in Portroe and my basic pay is nearly half of whats on offer in MTL. Having said that I am glad to have any Job at all. Thats after working for 20 years in the docks


    On my understanding last agreements reached for portroe crane drivers was 50,000 basic and for what would be considered old dockers have been known to exceed 90,000 as a result of overtime. (weary of 20 years service)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭gerrycollins


    Personally i detest unions but i cannot stand anyone taking working people for granted good luck in your fight

    they are a nescecery evil i have seen people hide behind them as they where lasy f**kers and i have seen people who work and dont cause hassle in the company need them due to mgmt bullying

    i know hear you loud and clear but wishful thinking that all management are fair/reasonable towards their staff


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    i know hear you loud and clear but wishful thinking that all management are fair/reasonable towards their staff

    That has been our problem from the start, the management have been completely unfair and unreasonable throughout this whole process and that is our major gripe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    On my understanding last agreements reached for portroe crane drivers was 50,000 basic and for what would be considered old dockers have been known to exceed 90,000 as a result of overtime. (weary of 20 years service)

    I think you are mixing portroe up with the shipside crane drivers in DFT(Old B&I). Believe me i earn nearly half of whats on offer and i believe acrew was put on weekend work last year on nearly 70,000 a year. Some young lads with only a months training.Great work if you can get it. No ship in on a saturday night, get paid to stay at home. 3 12 hour shifts a week for 70 grand. No wonder they are going mad now they have to do a bit......One of the drivers used to work here and he was always bragging about how handy the shift was....FACT>>>>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    whether any of us agree or disagree with whatever wages are being paid or alleged to be paid is not the issue.

    As I see it as an outsider, any employee who wishes to can be a member of a union under Irish Law and is entitled to be represented by the union of his choice.

    Peel Ports would appear to be trouncing over workers rights long established in this country.. Believe me other employers are carefully watching how this whole matter plays out and this could be a real 'test case' for SIPTU and unions in Ireland in general..

    I cannot believe how silent and ineffective SIPTU and ICTU have been since this strike has happened. It would appear only people working in the environs of Dublin Port know that there is indeed a strike on

    To the picketers on the gate, you really need to push the union to get some publicity and some real action going or Peel Ports will just leave you standing at the gate watching the trucks going in and out till you can no longer afford to stay out.. Once the hauliers rolled by the picket it has as such lost any effectiveness as it is not hurting Peels pockets or their relationship with their customers.

    Maybe you should take the picket to the river in boats and prevent vessels from docking at the berth?

    Neptune


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    It worries me to read comments from "Haulier" and the "portroe crane operator" attempting to confuse the issue of salary/wages (whether good or bad) with a shocking attack on a group of workers previously agreed upon working terms and conditions, duly agreed upon by both parties, employers and employees at the time.

    It is an outrage that workers from other ports (from outside this juristiction) within the MTL operation are being exploited to act as "strike breaking" labour. In truth these men lose the most. Their inability to recognise the indecency of being used as "scab" labour is unfortunate because if they could recognise this abuse of their rights they wouldn't be here. I wonder how many of these men will brag to their kith and kin of their strike breaking actions here in Dublin.

    This company cannot be allowed to win in this dispute using this style or behaviour because if they do win, our friends, the haulier and portroe crane operator, will soon be standing outside their own gates looking for support while somebody else does their jobs.
    We saw this kind of tactic on board Irish passenger ferries in recent years (although these vessels sailed then and now under flags of convenience) and while this is still unacceptable it's more sinister when non Irish nationals are shipped in to work on our soil here with the sole intent of undermining the rights of Irish workers.

    I am not a union member, in fact I'm self employed but I wonder where is the ICTU and why is there not a ballot for an all out strike of the dublin port instead of leaving these few MTL dockers to fight alone to put a stop to these shocking new tactics being used by their employer to break them.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 theroadahead


    Many thanks for your email regarding this matter. The situation is this, FM104 hire that truck from a contractor for promotional events. It is branded with FM104 and is not meant to be used for anything other than FM104 events. I have contacted the contractor and he informed me that one of his tractors broke down yesterday morning and therefore he had to use the FM104 branded vehicle for a delivery to the port. Needless to say, we are not happy with this nor the fact that he crossed your picket line. His actions to were not representative of FM104 and our ethos.

    I hope that this unfortunate incident will not deter you from listening to FM104 in the future.

    Sincere apologies,

    Feena O’Brien


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    Due to a threat made against an individual on the picket by one of the crane drivers still working in MTL we have decided to suspend the mtldockers website until the matter is investigated fully. Please continue to openly and freely discuss this dispute here on boards.ie, an unbiased forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Would that be similar to the threats being dished out to me and fellow hauliers over the last three weeks at your front gate? Like 'I hope you have fire insurance' etc. I dont agree with scab labour but if you dish it out be prepared to accept it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    mtldockers wrote: »
    Due to a threat made against an individual on the picket by one of the crane drivers still working in MTL we have decided to suspend the mtldockers website until the matter is investigated fully. Please continue to openly and freely discuss this dispute here on boards.ie, an unbiased forum.


    To strikers on the official picket line at MTL,
    Does I.S.P.S not apply at this terminal or is Dublin Port unaware of men been brought in from abroad with no back ground history of Dublin Port + as a result of badly stowed container vessel 'GERD' does Dublin Port not question the ability of these people to do a job that could have serious consequences for the environment of Dublin bay and crew of the vessel and finally regarding so called 'SECURITY' is it not true that these people would have to be licensed and if they are ex British soldiers are they licensed in Ireland???

    Good luck to all you guys on the line.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Haulier wrote: »
    I have been in and out of MTL over the past 4 or 5 years. There is a whole other side to this argument. I earn half the wage working double the hours of the offer reported to be on the table. What angers me is the failure to mention a lot of underhand goings on within this port in the past. Over the past three weeks we have recieved a much better service with no damage or "preferential treatment" which was common place on a daily basis.

    Remember!! There are two sides to every story, I don't wan't to see anyone losing their jobs. Keep an open mind.

    4 years ago = 2005= BOOM YEARS, the place was so busy you were up to your eyeballs. Now it is slow you get your container quicker, ie. last 3 weeks also last year. The same men in there are the men who damaged your trailor before, you retard. You can compare 1 year with 1 year, but not 4-5 weeks with 3 weeks you gob****e.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    I think you are mixing portroe up with the shipside crane drivers in DFT(Old B&I). Believe me i earn nearly half of whats on offer and i believe acrew was put on weekend work last year on nearly 70,000 a year. Some young lads with only a months training.Great work if you can get it. No ship in on a saturday night, get paid to stay at home. 3 12 hour shifts a week for 70 grand. No wonder they are going mad now they have to do a bit......One of the drivers used to work here and he was always bragging about how handy the shift was....FACT>>>>

    Not confusing DFT with Portroe from someone employed within the port.Dockers at portroe should have done what staff at MTL are doing 12-18 months maybe 2 years ago with the path wore out to the labour court with unfair dismissals from Portroe & the choice to work beside non union agency workers at a lower rate of pay on a regular basis!!!

    Regarding your ex colleague who i would believe had no choice but to look for alternative employment as a result of a witch hunt and if hadn't of being successful with his application to MTL he would most likely of been waiting for an unfair dismissals claim.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Great job being done at the site at the minute lads. Keep up the good work and keep us truckers rollin!!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Haulier wrote: »
    I have been in and out of MTL over the past 4 or 5 years. There is a whole other side to this argument. I earn half the wage working double the hours of the offer reported to be on the table. What angers me is the failure to mention a lot of underhand goings on within this port in the past. Over the past three weeks we have recieved a much better service with no damage or "preferential treatment" which was common place on a daily basis.

    Remember!! There are two sides to every story, I don't wan't to see anyone losing their jobs. Keep an open mind.

    Haulier have you not recognised the lack of interest from Dublin Port in this dispute because an agreement was reached some years ago with Dublin Port that this operation will move back to the Northside were land will be reclaimed which already has RAILINK to do away with ROAD TRANSPORT!!!

    If anyone from Clontarf is reading this Dublin Port see the terminal at MTL Dublin 4 as been much more valuable for development & at the cost of the residents in Clontarf and surrounding areas. Please contact your local government rep to protect your area. Log onto www.dublinport.ie and view proposed terminal 5 site.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6 theroadahead


    Haulier, if you really are a haulier, No truck drivers have been threatened at the gate, we are holding a peaceful protest and are not breaking any of the conditions laid down by the ridiculous injunction served on us!
    In fact Haulier, if you respected Irish workers rights, you would'nt be going into MTL in the first place and passing a picket, If PEEL ports win this dispute, God help workers in Ireland, it'll be a huge step backwards, and in 20 years time Mr. Haulier, when your children come home and tell you they were sacked for no reason and have no grounds to appeal it, you hold your head up high and proud and say "Kids, because of people like me, this happened" and give them a big proud smile!
    Mr. Portroe, If you're down in the docks 20 years then I dont see why someone like yourself would'nt be supporting us, are you jealous? are you spiteful?? Or are you not really a port worker at all??? Or maybe you are and your one of the scabs going into MTL in your blackened out bodyguard car????
    THIS DISPUTE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WAGES, SO IF YOUR GOING TO POST A RESPONSE HERE PLEASE KNOW YOUR FACTS!!!!!!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    Would that be similar to the threats being dished out to me and fellow hauliers over the last three weeks at your front gate? Like 'I hope you have fire insurance' etc. I dont agree with scab labour but if you dish it out be prepared to accept it.

    If threats have been made against you why do you not report it to the relevant authorities? The majority of hauliers get in without incident but the odd driver that feels the need to speed up as they come up to the gate to gain those valuable extra few seconds whilst putting the lives of the peaceful picketers in danger might have a few choice words said to them. People tend to react badly to almost being run over by massive HGV's!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    To strikers on the official picket line at MTL,
    Does I.S.P.S not apply at this terminal or is Dublin Port unaware of men been brought in from abroad with no back ground history of Dublin Port + as a result of badly stowed container vessel 'GERD' does Dublin Port not question the ability of these people to do a job that could have serious consequences for the environment of Dublin bay and crew of the vessel and finally regarding so called 'SECURITY' is it not true that these people would have to be licensed and if they are ex British soldiers are they licensed in Ireland???

    Good luck to all you guys on the line.

    This is something that would have to be looked into but thank you for the info.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24 mtldockers


    I think you are mixing portroe up with the shipside crane drivers in DFT(Old B&I). Believe me i earn nearly half of whats on offer and i believe acrew was put on weekend work last year on nearly 70,000 a year. Some young lads with only a months training.Great work if you can get it. No ship in on a saturday night, get paid to stay at home. 3 12 hour shifts a week for 70 grand. No wonder they are going mad now they have to do a bit......One of the drivers used to work here and he was always bragging about how handy the shift was....FACT>>>>

    Could there have been a more unsociable shift than 19.00 - 07.00 Friday, Saturday and Sunday!! Most people would not accept any amount of money to do that shift....FACT (Now we are just waiting for this person to say "i'd do it"... sure!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    just 2 short questions.who does the twist locks.who ties the vessels


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    mtldockers wrote: »
    Could there have been a more unsociable shift than 19.00 - 07.00 Friday, Saturday and Sunday!! Most people would not accept any amount of money to do that shift....FACT (Now we are just waiting for this person to say "i'd do it"... sure!)

    I drive a taxi these nights and wednesday and thursday night aswell. Due to the increase in licences and the downturn I am struggling to pay bills. I would love a salary to be paid every week for that shift. I think the recession is the wrong tome to strike. People are worried about their own job security, which is why they are passing the picket. I drop in there for a fare now and then. I havent been called lately but i will pass. Siptu wont pay MY bills. Sorry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Folks,

    I read so much here about getting the facts right. Quite frankly it's all a bit hypocritical. It may be down to you receiving dodgy info but here ARE the facts.

    1. There was no such incident of the m.v.Gerd being dangerously stowed.
    2. There was no such incident of crane booms putting berthing vessels in danger.
    3. There was no such "near miss" of a reefer falling from height onto a truck.
    4. Threats have been common place to both workers and hauliers entering the port.
    5. Operators are fully versed in the ISPS Code and have been since it was introduced.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    mtldockers wrote: »
    Could there have been a more unsociable shift than 19.00 - 07.00 Friday, Saturday and Sunday!! Most people would not accept any amount of money to do that shift....FACT (Now we are just waiting for this person to say "i'd do it"... sure!)

    Are you saying you wouldn't do those 3 shifts for 70,000.......There would be a queue as long as the M1 to do that!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    I think you are mixing portroe up with the shipside crane drivers in DFT(Old B&I). Believe me i earn nearly half of whats on offer and i believe acrew was put on weekend work last year on nearly 70,000 a year. Some young lads with only a months training.Great work if you can get it. No ship in on a saturday night, get paid to stay at home. 3 12 hour shifts a week for 70 grand. No wonder they are going mad now they have to do a bit......One of the drivers used to work here and he was always bragging about how handy the shift was....FACT>>>>

    Portroe crane driver
    After thinking about it you are 20 years IN the docks but portroe still have a couple of years left for 20th birthday but Cathal when you got on the road to Dublin it was to Dublin ferries and think back to D.C.H doing the stevedoring with all us old hands.

    as far as working IN the docks everybody else managed to work ON the docks. . .

    From an old hand


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Haulier wrote: »
    I have been in and out of MTL over the past 4 or 5 years. There is a whole other side to this argument. I earn half the wage working double the hours of the offer reported to be on the table. What angers me is the failure to mention a lot of underhand goings on within this port in the past. Over the past three weeks we have recieved a much better service with no damage or "preferential treatment" which was common place on a daily basis.

    Remember!! There are two sides to every story, I don't wan't to see anyone losing their jobs. Keep an open mind.

    I don't like to see anyone lose their job.
    Today I was held hostage at MTL by picketers. Fine, if you don't want to let me in, don't.
    But if you let me in, don't hold me hostage. If you you stop me from entering I have the choice to turn around and not enter, if you don't let me out, thats imprisonment. False imprisonment is a crime in this country.
    As a truck driver our job is hard enough with out being the target in labour dispute's. Peel Ports doesn't care if you disrupt the trucks, it doesn't cost them anything. If you disrupt the ships then they might take notice. I just want to know, why is it the truck driver who has to pay the price?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Just a quick observation......Where is your support!It seems like even you as picketers have lost all interest.Nothing in the media and attacks on so called scabs have done nothing to highlight your cause.There is a recession,lots of people have lost there jobs and it seems like you are all going to join the many thousands on the dole queue


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Just would like too wish you mtl dockers the best in this I am proud too see that you all are true too your generations and yourselves unlike some I have my facts here and when someone makes an attack like this you are damn right in what you are doing, I will show my support as long as it takes, this company makes me sick but you are already have something they don't pride and a sense of humanity. Good luck people I'm with you'd every step of the way. Your support will mount trust me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 166,026 ✭✭✭✭LegacyUser


    Peel Ports have now issued letters to all staff on the picket line informing that all jobs are now at risk of redundancy, where in the world would you get it????? This is another swipe by peel ports to frighten people on the picket line. I would like to to say to the lads and ladies on the picket line "KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK, DONT BE AFRAID TO STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS"


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement