Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Mary Lou McDonald - The Week in Politics

  • 21-06-2009 10:19pm
    #1
    Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Unless I am mistaken, Mary Lou McDonald no longer has a position of power. She is neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP.

    She is a president of the Sinn Fein political party. Why is she still on TV speaking on Political matters which should be for elected representatives? She is not representing anybody. Shes just there to waffle on behalf of her party - but surely that should be the job of a TD/MEP?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭Dozen Wicked Words


    Didn't Declan Ganley get lots of air time on various TV shows. Surely he isn't representing anyone either (except his own self interest). So what is the difference?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 605 ✭✭✭j1smithy


    I was thinking the same myself. She has no mandate, so she only speaks for herself. I want my spot on the week in politics now!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 693 ✭✭✭Crotchety


    I think that woman is a glove of Gerry Adams and has no voice of her own. She blurts in the same voice and tone as Gerry except in a Dublin accent. She has no mandate, no power, no figure and certainly no passion.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sully


    dooferoaks wrote: »
    Didn't Declan Ganley get lots of air time on various TV shows. Surely he isn't representing anyone either (except his own self interest). So what is the difference?

    He was running for election, was a party leader and lead the Lisbon No Campaign. Obviouslly he is going to attract media attention. As should Mary Lou prior to an election but she was voted out by the people and no longer has a position of power. Her opinions are worthless as she cant do anything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    well she did get thousands of first preference votes in her constituency - obviously some people still want to listen to her.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sully


    Max Power1 wrote: »
    well she did get thousands of first preference votes in her constituency - obviously some people still want to listen to her.

    What about all the other candidates who got thousands of first preference votes, yet failed to meet the quota. Should they be allowed speak on political programmes? I am specifically refering to candidates who are neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP. There nothing, bar a member of a party.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    Sully wrote: »
    What about all the other candidates who got thousands of first preference votes, yet failed to meet the quota. Should they be allowed speak on political programmes? I am specifically refering to candidates who are neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP. There nothing, bar a member of a party.
    But she's not speaking as a TD, she's speaking in her own capacity, as an unelected member of a political party. (And a recognisable member of the party at that)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    Sully wrote: »
    What about all the other candidates who got thousands of first preference votes, yet failed to meet the quota. Should they be allowed speak on political programmes? I am specifically refering to candidates who are neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP. There nothing, bar a member of a party.

    She's vice president of a party that had TDs and councillors, 4th biggest party in the state. She's kind of seen as the "down south" sinn fein leader so I think its fair enough


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,325 ✭✭✭✭Dozen Wicked Words


    Sully wrote: »
    What about all the other candidates who got thousands of first preference votes, yet failed to meet the quota. Should they be allowed speak on political programmes? I am specifically refering to candidates who are neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP. There nothing, bar a member of a party.


    So Libertas (if they were still in existence) would only have been allowed airtime before a European election in your view?

    Would they not find it virtually impossible to create an understanding of their policies (if they had any) if only given a window of a month or so every five years.

    Isn't this just a plan for maintaining a status quo of the old guard in Irish politics?

    Politicians don't just worry about their profile in the two or three months before an election, in this media age, every day is needed to get your face (and policies if you have any) onto the television,radio,net,papers etc. Just because they have failed once does not exclude them from trying again.

    Did Mary Lou McDonald only lose her seat in Dublin because they were reduced from 4 to 3? (genuine question. this is how I understand it, but I may be misinformed)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,272 ✭✭✭✭Max Power1


    dooferoaks wrote: »
    Did Mary Lou McDonald only lose her seat in Dublin because they were reduced from 4 to 3? (genuine question. this is how I understand it, but I may be misinformed)

    As far as im aware she polled 4th so if there were 4 seats she woudl have got one.

    Also, who decides who is allowed to speak on a political programme? Its a private radio station so they can have whoever they want on. Freedom of speech anyone??


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,895 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    The Provos can send anyone they wish to represent them. RTE can invite anyone they wish to have on their shows. Wouldnt worry too much about it. Shes a fitting mouthpiece for them. All talk, no clue.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,165 ✭✭✭✭brianthebard


    She's vice president of a party that had TDs and councillors, 4th biggest party in the state. She's kind of seen as the "down south" sinn fein leader so I think its fair enough

    Isn't that Caoimhghín Ó Caoláin's job?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,026 ✭✭✭Amalgam


    She was filmed in front of Leinster House for the news, would she have access to the premises at all at this point, or does she have to be invited by an elected member inside?

    What does her current 'title' permit her to do?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,262 ✭✭✭✭Joey the lips


    Folks this is really really stupid. Fair enough she is not a TD but neither is Gerry Adams for that matter. She is however party vice president and as the dublin MEP canidate for sinn fein you are going to hear her a lot now that Nice 2 has been re presented.

    Surely this is political discussion like. Why is Mary Lou argueing against nice again

    Surely this is not all we have to say about mary lou?

    ps I know its lisbon 2 and not nice 2 but I figured while we are having a laugh!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭g5fd6ow0hseima


    Seems a little too big for her boots, time she steps up to the reality that she wasnt wanted in the european parliament and retreats like all the other failed candidates.

    To me, she has forgotten herself! cant she swallow her pride?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,787 ✭✭✭g5fd6ow0hseima


    dooferoaks wrote: »
    Did Mary Lou McDonald only lose her seat in Dublin because they were reduced from 4 to 3? (genuine question. this is how I understand it, but I may be misinformed)

    Nope, she was eliminated prior to Eoin Ryan, so any blaming of the decrease to 3 seats cant be!

    http://www.rte.ie/news/elections/european/dublin_counts.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,350 ✭✭✭Het-Field


    Nope, she was eliminated prior to Eoin Ryan, so any blaming of the decrease to 3 seats cant be!

    http://www.rte.ie/news/elections/european/dublin_counts.html

    Either way though, it was her or Higgins who was going to take the seat. They were in the top five, with Ryan seeking surplus votes from De Rossa (Small Amount), and Mitchell (the FG Europhiles who would set aside party politics for another Pro EU head in power). Save for Ebhiln Byrne's pathetic showing, which didnt even properly transfer to Ryan anyway, both MLM and Higgins were going to get transfers from all sides. Most notibly Higgins, who was picking them from everywhere.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 695 ✭✭✭RealityCheck


    Look, there was only one reason why she was on the programme. It was due to the feature that they were doing about Sinn Feins identity crisis. Simple as that. Dont think we will see that much of her from now on in.....except for maybe Lisbon 2 :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    I'm of the opinion that the end of her political career has begun, if she had gotten elected in Dublin (which I thought she would) then she may have hung in there but now I'd be very surprised to see her take a seat in Leinster House. They should have ran Nicky Keogh in Dublin Central in 2007 (he'd have walked in) and put her in underneath him as a councillor, she could have then used that position to build a profile and a reputation for work on the ground; the most important factor in a Sinn Féin candidates chances of electoral success. Instead they jumped the gun, did a complete 180 on their policies and political philosophy nationally, and parachuted her into the constituancy where she got a cool reception. And rightfully so, it was cynicism of the highest degree.

    Sinn Féin have invested heavily in this one person, part and parcel of their policy of creating a party of friendly faces and centrist, populist platitudes as opposed to the solid graft and radicalism that made them popular in the first place. Mary Lou, and the southern Sinn Féin project are currently in deep crisis, and they have a lot of things they need to iron out. Personally I view that project as having too many inherent contradictions to fix though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,708 ✭✭✭Erin Go Brath


    Sully wrote: »
    Unless I am mistaken, Mary Lou McDonald no longer has a position of power. She is neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP.

    She is a president of the Sinn Fein political party. Why is she still on TV speaking on Political matters which should be for elected representatives? She is not representing anybody. Shes just there to waffle on behalf of her party - but surely that should be the job of a TD/MEP?

    Well shes one of SFs main spokespersons on the Lisbon treaty for one, and Vice President of the party. Of course she should be entitled to be on TV shows discussing Lisbon or other political matters. This is a stupid thread!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,693 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sad Professor


    I don't think we've seen the last of Mary Lou. She's going to want to keep her profile high between now and the next general election. But if she fails to win a seat again that probably will be the end of her alright.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 693 ✭✭✭Crotchety


    Sinn Fein have lost the southern people. People can't understand them anymore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 15,914 ✭✭✭✭tbh


    it's up to any party to nominate anyone they want to speak on their behalf. OF course, they run the risk of people asking questions like yours, sully, and also of the spokesperson themselves being confronted with the fact during debates, but I guess they feel it's just a risk worth taking.

    Now Gerry Adams, on the other hand, is a feckin MP! but that's another thread.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Sully wrote: »
    Unless I am mistaken, Mary Lou McDonald no longer has a position of power. She is neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP.

    She is a president of the Sinn Fein political party. Why is she still on TV speaking on Political matters which should be for elected representatives? She is not representing anybody. Shes just there to waffle on behalf of her party - but surely that should be the job of a TD/MEP?

    I was thinking the very same thing myself!

    Not only was she on TV debates since her Euro defeat, but she has also been on several radio shows in recent days spouting off as if she had got the job, surely the victors should be in the limelight & not MLM ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    Is there some rule that only elected politicians can be on tv or should we also ban male gynaecologists?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,262 ✭✭✭✭Joey the lips


    Camelot wrote: »
    I was thinking the very same thing myself!

    Not only was she on TV debates since her Euro defeat, but she has also been on several radio shows in recent days spouting off as if she had got the job, surely the victors should be in the limelight & not MLM ?

    Yeah I agree only elected people should be allowed to speak :rolleyes:

    I commend her really for keeping herself in the limelight even though she lost


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 843 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    RTE ask SF for someone from the party to speak and they pick McDonald. Where is the mystery?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 24,056 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sully


    eoinbn wrote: »
    RTE ask SF for someone from the party to speak and they pick McDonald. Where is the mystery?

    That they pick someone who the public said no to?! Or perhaps that she is the only good candidate that can speak on behalf of her party. Either or.

    I can see why she would have been chosen but you would have thought SF would send an elected representative to such discussions. I personally would prefer to see elected representatives of party's on these discussion rather then those who tried and failed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    Sully wrote: »
    ... I can see why she would have been chosen but you would have thought SF would send an elected representative to such discussions. I personally would prefer to see elected representatives of party's on these discussion rather then those who tried and failed.

    Among the factors that parties consider when deciding who should represent them is the promotion of candidates or prospective candidates. Sinn Féin seem to give more weight to that than do other parties. That's why MLM gets so much exposure.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,718 ✭✭✭✭JonathanAnon


    I was asking the same question when I saw Patricia McKenna on with Vincent Browne last week. Spose they have to try to keep their profile for when they run for office the next time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    I think the underlying question here is; Why wasn't Gay Mitchel, Joe Higgins, or Proinsias De Rossa on 'The week in politics' following the Euro Elections? and why was Mary Lou pushed forward after her defeat!

    If there was a general election next week & Fine Gael won, headed by Enda Kenny, I would expect to see Enda Kenny being asked the hard questions on the Politics show (and not the defeated Brian Cowan).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,013 ✭✭✭lynchie


    Sully wrote: »
    Unless I am mistaken, Mary Lou McDonald no longer has a position of power. She is neither a TD, Local Councillor or MEP.

    She is still an MEP until the first sitting of the parliament on the 14th July at which time all new MEP's take their seats.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 45 mrtaylor1981


    I would reintroduce Section 31 and ban the terrorist apologists regardless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,375 ✭✭✭kmick


    Its in her interest to keep her face on TV so that she has a chance at a TD seat in the next general election. No one can blame her for that. It was always her stated aim she wanted to be a TD rather than an MEP. I might not agree with her poilitics but its all about promotion in their game so you might be seeing her a lot in the next 12 months.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,078 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    kmick wrote: »
    I might not agree with her poilitics but its all about promotion in their game so you might be seeing her a lot in the next 12 months.

    Oh please God no, I hope you are wrong .............
    That harsh voice, the categorical statements "let me be perfectly clear" "I am speaking" "we will decide when this happens" the hectoring, "the bleedin obvious soundbites", she should be gagged :)

    I cant stand the woman or her SF policies.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement