Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Interesting copyright kerfuffle

  • 19-06-2009 10:19am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,185 ✭✭✭


    There is an interesting copyright kerfuffle going on at the moment over on Lightroomkillertips. During the week they published a link to a website where you could insert the address of a photo on flickr, the software would read the exif of that shot on flickr and attempt to create a Lightroom preset based on it. It's important to note that the site did not download the picture just read settings in the publicly available exif data uploaded by the owner.

    It transpired that some folks took exception to this on the basis that the combination of settings they had used is their IP and copyright to them and threatened legal action with the result that the site has been taken down.

    Since then LKT has come back with a strong defence of their position. While it's all a bit of a storm in a teacup there are some interesting arguments WRT copyright and photographers rights on there.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,048 ✭✭✭RoryW


    preset extractor now taken down "due to some people in Europe"


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    did anyone get to download the tool before it was removed? If so can you PM me....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    steve06 wrote: »
    did anyone get to download the tool before it was removed? If so can you PM me....

    :P

    There's an update from the author saying
    I want to bring the preset extractor back online. And will do so tonight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    I noticed that... I just want to play with it now though :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    Oh sorry, I thought you were kidding because of all the comments in the article asking if anyone had downloaded the tool...

    All the other responses to those were that it wasn't a download kind of tool - you bookmarked a page, went to the picture on flickr, then hit the booklink and it did things (*makes magic handy wave motions*) then.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,809 ✭✭✭✭smash


    ah right, I didn't read the whole thing... I just went back here to ask... haha


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    The tool's up now anyway :D

    Edit
    I don't use LR, but for those who are interested, I took a look in Notepad at one of the images in the flickrpool. An extract from one pic looks like this:
    LuminanceAdjustmentMagenta = 0,
    SplitToningShadowHue = 57,
    SplitToningShadowSaturation = 15,
    SplitToningHighlightHue = 57,
    SplitToningHighlightSaturation = 15,
    SplitToningBalance = 0,
    ParametricShadows = -14,
    ParametricDarks = -3,

    There's lots more info obviously, but that's the kind of thing it's extracting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,534 ✭✭✭✭Dan Jaman


    Storm in a teacup, right enough.
    It's like following a recipe out of a book - millions of people might copy a great chef, but damn few will produce something exactly the same, no matter how exactly they did it. What's more likely to happen is that many people will apply pre-sets to images that aren't really all that much like the ones they try to emulate and the results will be different anyway.
    There is no such thing as talent in a box and this is just another way of proving it. What I hope it does is show people how to progress and achieve some of the results they admire; many will be happy just clicking a mouse, but it will inspire others to look carefully at the values and effects and hopefully lead to a better understanding of the way Lightroom and similar programs work.

    The poster, Patrick, on the first site was getting awfully areated about the 'stealing of his ideas', but really, what possible threat could this be to him and his work? It's unlikely that thousands of 'Patrick' impersonators will flood his home town and poach his customers. :)
    Вашему собственному бычьему дерьму нельзя верить - V Putin
    




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    I don't think i have EVER applied a preset in LR without then going on to abuse the sliders pretty heavily to be honest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Anouilh


    The extractor does not work if a photo is uploaded under the "All Rights Reserved" licence. However, by adding it to the Lightroom Preset Extractor group on Flickr, one allows access to metadata on photos.

    I can think of more entertaining activites than looking at exif data, but the question arising here for me is how to best save exif metadata when converting a file from RAW to Jpeg. I would like to start inserting copyright material and tags into my photos for uploading to Flickr but do not have Photoshop and Adobe Bridge. Is there a quick freeware or shareware program that can do this, please?


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    Erm.... why don't they just hide the exif data? :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Anouilh


    Erm.... why don't they just hide the exif data? :confused:

    This explains a bit more about metadata:

    http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/cp/olympus/technology/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003646340

    It's all a bit of a mystery to me. I usually just look at exif data as a reminder of what camera setting I used.

    I don't think you can easily hide it. The idea is to make a photo instantly recognisable as belonging to the person who made it. Tags are used to keep track of photos on the Internet and protect them from theft. One blogger, suddenly aware that a photo was being used by another person, simply added the tag "I steal photos" into the Exif data. Much quicker than getting worked up and starting a row.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    In PS, if you ''save for web devices'', it won't include any exif info with the picture.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Anouilh


    I'm converting from RAW to Jpeg and would like to retain more information and also add tags. Most conversions lose exif data, as you say.

    This deals with some other exif editors:

    http://forums.steves-digicams.com/pentax-samsung-dslr/124850-exif-editor-you-using.html

    It's worth thinking about whether or not extracting exif data, once a photo is uploaded, is some sort of intrusion that could be a nuisance, as the op started explaining.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭sheesh


    Anouilh wrote: »
    The extractor does not work if a photo is uploaded under the "All Rights Reserved" licence. However, by adding it to the Lightroom Preset Extractor group on Flickr, one allows access to metadata on photos.

    I can think of more entertaining activites than looking at exif data, but the question arising here for me is how to best save exif metadata when converting a file from RAW to Jpeg. I would like to start inserting copyright material and tags into my photos for uploading to Flickr but do not have Photoshop and Adobe Bridge. Is there a quick freeware or shareware program that can do this, please?

    I know in the software you get with canon it exports it into the jpeg

    Also to get rid of the exif data. open the image up in you image editing software select all, copy, create new image of same size, paste no more exif data.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,826 ✭✭✭Anouilh


    Delighted with all my new knowledge I uploaded a photo to Flickr yesterday with IPTC copyright and tags embedded. Today I dowloaded a medium size version of the photo, but the exif data had been stripped by the resizing system in Flickr. This is much discussed:

    http://www.flickr.com/groups/flickrideas/discuss/72157600133760332/

    I used to think little about this, but since many people are not aware of copyright laws and need to have reminders embedded in photos on the net , it might be useful to see which sharing sites keep Exif data intact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,899 ✭✭✭Paddy@CIRL


    The exif is usually stored in the original quality one :)


Advertisement